Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
1/22/2020 12:12:56 PM
Posted: 11/19/2012 3:44:10 PM EST
lib FB post is this..

"‎"GOP freakout over Susan Rice seems like a strong argument in favor of appointing her.""

my response was

"Ambassador Rice is widely viewed as having either willfully or incompetently misled the American public in the Benghazi matter," it says. "Her actions plausibly give U.S. allies (and rivals) abroad reason to question U.S. commitment and credibility when needed.

dont sound like a R issue, sounds like a US issue...


his response....

Hmm. Usually when we use quotation marks, we're expected to supply the source...Surprise, surprise, the quote comes from a letter signed by––wait for it––House Republicans! (and a minority at that). This view is held "widely" only among the even stupider wing of the Republican party.

.............


ive been googleing for her actual words she used, but not finding much...


Link Posted: 11/19/2012 3:45:32 PM EST
Your life would be a lot better if you removed Facebook from it......
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 3:53:30 PM EST
Originally Posted By scootr29:
Your life would be a lot better if you removed Facebook from it......


A LOT better.

Link Posted: 11/19/2012 4:04:29 PM EST
Originally Posted By OhioLongRange:
lib FB post is this..

"‎"GOP freakout over Susan Rice seems like a strong argument in favor of appointing her.""

my response was

"Ambassador Rice is widely viewed as having either willfully or incompetently misled the American public in the Benghazi matter," it says. "Her actions plausibly give U.S. allies (and rivals) abroad reason to question U.S. commitment and credibility when needed.

dont sound like a R issue, sounds like a US issue...


his response....

Hmm. Usually when we use quotation marks, we're expected to supply the source...Surprise, surprise, the quote comes from a letter signed by––wait for it––House Republicans! (and a minority at that). This view is held "widely" only among the even stupider wing of the Republican party.

.............


ive been googleing for her actual words she used, but not finding much...




I have learned from Harry Reid that hear say evidence is all that is needed to support ones agenda. Proof be damned.
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 4:21:27 PM EST
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 4:24:11 PM EST
Originally Posted By mongreltude:
Full transcript inside.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/11/16/flashback-what-susan-rice-said-about-benghazi/



what this guy said.

OP, your friend is a flaming homosexual and probably likes the m1. find a better friend.
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 4:50:00 PM EST
Defriend him. Problem solved.
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 4:54:40 PM EST
Originally Posted By OilyPablo:
Originally Posted By scootr29:
Your life would be a lot better if you removed Facebook from it......


A LOT better.



A WAY LOT better
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 5:02:07 PM EST
Originally Posted By GO4SHOOT:
Originally Posted By OhioLongRange:
lib FB post is this..

"‎"GOP freakout over Susan Rice seems like a strong argument in favor of appointing her.""

my response was

"Ambassador Rice is widely viewed as having either willfully or incompetently misled the American public in the Benghazi matter," it says. "Her actions plausibly give U.S. allies (and rivals) abroad reason to question U.S. commitment and credibility when needed.

dont sound like a R issue, sounds like a US issue...


his response....

Hmm. Usually when we use quotation marks, we're expected to supply the source...Surprise, surprise, the quote comes from a letter signed by––wait for it––House Republicans! (and a minority at that). This view is held "widely" only among the even stupider wing of the Republican party.

.............


ive been googleing for her actual words she used, but not finding much...




I have learned from Harry Reid that hear say evidence is all that is needed to support ones agenda. Proof be damned.


Is he still denying his involvement with NAMBLA?

Link Posted: 11/19/2012 5:04:10 PM EST
Fuck Facebook and FBHO.
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 5:06:36 PM EST

Originally Posted By Jerryjeff:
Fuck Facebook and FBHO.
You got dat right!

Been Facebook and social media free for 12 months, and never going back.

It's like watching adults perpetually stuck in 7th grade.

CVN

Link Posted: 11/19/2012 5:19:29 PM EST
Facebook is gay.
Link Posted: 11/19/2012 5:27:07 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/19/2012 5:28:04 PM EST by SvenFrost]

Originally Posted By OhioLongRange:
lib FB post is this..

"‎"GOP freakout over Susan Rice seems like a strong argument in favor of appointing her.""

my response was

"Ambassador Rice is widely viewed as having either willfully or incompetently misled the American public in the Benghazi matter," it says. "Her actions plausibly give U.S. allies (and rivals) abroad reason to question U.S. commitment and credibility when needed.

dont sound like a R issue, sounds like a US issue...


his response....

Hmm. Usually when we use quotation marks, we're expected to supply the source...Surprise, surprise, the quote comes from a letter signed by––wait for it––House Republicans! (and a minority at that). This view is held "widely" only among the even stupider wing of the Republican party.

.............


ive been googleing for her actual words she used, but not finding much...


1. You are required to provide a source for quoted material buy your friend is not? You have a source, ask for his while simultaneously calling him out on the double standard.

2. He is publicly intimating that you are stupid because you are part of the "stupider wing of the Republican party." Since the view can already be attributed to you through your statement, he believes you are snared by the un-sourced "appeal to authority" argument that only the "stupider wing" believes what you believe.

3. Your friend is better at douchebaggery than you are.

4. It is clear that your friend never learned to speak to people with maturity and civility.

I suggest you begin any response with a nearly word for word quote from his post, inserting the relevant facts. Don't forget to the condescending "Hmm."


Link Posted: 11/19/2012 6:21:35 PM EST
[Last Edit: 11/19/2012 6:43:56 PM EST by OhioLongRange]
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/11/16/flashback-what-susan-rice-said-about-benghazi/
Link Posted: 11/20/2012 1:24:31 AM EST
Don't miss the point with him.

The President knew the attack was happening and did nothing. Americans died. Will he say the President didn't know???????????
Link Posted: 11/20/2012 2:18:40 AM EST
It's like the magic of ARFcom. First post, almost always.

YUP, FPNI
Link Posted: 11/20/2012 5:27:57 AM EST
  • ME

    She shared talking points known to be false from the administration to shift the blame at the end of the election, which put the blame on some poor idiot of a film maker. End of story. Everybody outside of moonbats realized this months ago.
    </a> · Edited ·



  • It was a great plan––because it's obvious that the original story is MUCH better for the administration. The American people have made abundantly clear that if bad guys participated in a protest before killing the ambassador, then Obama is awesome, but if they didn't he's a war criminal! Also they managed to maintain their great fiction for all of several days, until the revised intelligence was revealed. Yet, somehow a month an a half later, the American people still rejected Willard. Weird.
    security.blogs.cnn.com
    By Pam Benson The intelligence community –– not the White House, State Depart...
Top Top