

Posted: 8/23/2017 8:22:26 PM EST
HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE, N.M. (Aug. 1, 2017) A Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano A-29 experimental aircraft flies over White Sands Missile Range. The A-29 is participating in the U.S. Air Force Light Attack Experiment (OA-X), a series of trials to determine the feasibility of using light aircraft in attack roles. (U.S. Air Force Photo by Ethan D. Wagner) https://media.defense.gov/2017/Aug/18/2001794372/-1/-1/0/170801-F-ZZ999-085.JPG To open a larger image click on link |
|
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXR9WNtKOz4[/youtube]
|
|
View Quote |
|
So a low-flying low-speed prop aircraft flying combat missions.
Do they just not expect them to come back alive? |
|
Looks like a GBU-12. Nothing an MQ-9 can't do.
Where are the gun tapes? |
|
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
So a low-flying low-speed prop aircraft flying combat missions. Do they just not expect them to come back alive? View Quote |
|
View Quote ![]() |
|
I'm sure the AF will pick the jet powered one, because it's a jet.
You you imagine an A-1 with a modern engine and built out of modern materials? As big as that fucker is, it could be up there forever! |
|
If I had Bill Gates money, I'd buy one of those Scorpions for fun.
![]() |
|
If the planes work as well as the video's voice synthesizer . . . WE'RE ALL FOOKED! I'd like to see the specs for all four. How fast can each get on station? How long can they loiter? What's the max payload? Are they anywhere near as hardened as the A-10?
So, the video says that John McCain authorized the budget. Personally? |
|
|
Sounds interesting and all, but why would we invest in sending a real pilot down range when we could do much more with a UAV? (unmanned aircraft)
|
|
|
|
The national news has been showing Tucano's in Afghanistan the last couple of days. They can drop bombs over there, and the air and gravity here are about the same, so they'll work here, too.
|
|
now that is a picture
love it |
|
I like sleek sexy stealth fighters and attack craft.
In the majority of operations we have been involved in over the last 20 years, a low cost, long loiter time ac would have worked great. Even fighting NK, they will do a fine job of cleanup after all the major SAM and AA systems have been cleaned up. |
|
What are those pods on the AT-6? 40mm?
|
|
Looks like the paper bomb we used in, Operation: Clear and present danger. Is it?
|
|
|
My only issue with these CAS and COIN planes is lack of payload capacity. The thing should be able to carry 2-4 1000lb bombs, all kinds of rockets, 20 or 30mm vulcan or maybe 4x.50cals.
|
|
Nm. Read it as .303's, carry on. Substitute 20 mil for a 40mm chaingun though.
|
|
Quoted:
WTF are you on about? 6X.50 machine guns, 1X20mm hispano cannon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Update. Outboard .338 mini-guns. Nacelle 20mm cannon. Assorted Hate on hardpoints. Fast as hell even in WW2. 2 engines. ![]() https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WCapVFcVR1o/maxresdefault.jpg |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Sounds interesting and all, but why would we invest in sending a real pilot down range when we could do much more with a UAV? (unmanned aircraft) View Quote These aircraft allow pilots to gain experience for $500-$3000 per flight hour (instead of $15-30,000), and saves our high value aircraft for other missions. While giving peripheral vision that no UAV/RPV will ever match. At a meaningful distance to the ground. With less lag for danger close sorties. While being able to allow for FAC duties if necessary due to eyes on. While supposedly having less thermal heat signature for MANPADS. So yeah. Goat fuckers can hack a UAV/RPV data stream, on an aircraft with lag, that has bad peripheral vision, that flies high enough to remove the "close" from CAS. And if you're lucky, your enemy will be dumber than the Iranians who managed to take over an RQ-170. Theres roles for UAV/RPV. CAS isn't one of them. |
|
Quoted:
Update. Outboard .338 mini-guns. Nacelle 20mm cannon. Assorted Hate on hardpoints. Fast as hell even in WW2. 2 engines. ![]() https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WCapVFcVR1o/maxresdefault.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
So a low-flying low-speed prop aircraft flying combat missions. Do they just not expect them to come back alive? View Quote ![]() |
|
Quoted:
Signals like that cut a hole in the sky that even Iran hacked. These aircraft allow pilots to gain experience for $500-$3000 per flight hour (instead of $15-30,000), and saves our high value aircraft for other missions. While giving peripheral vision that no UAV/RPV will ever match. At a meaningful distance to the ground. With less lag for danger close sorties. While being able to allow for FAC duties if necessary due to eyes on. While supposedly having less thermal heat signature for MANPADS. So yeah. Goat fuckers can hack a UAV/RPV data stream, on an aircraft with lag, that has bad peripheral vision, that flies high enough to remove the "close" from CAS. And if you're lucky, your enemy will be dumber than the Iranians who managed to take over an RQ-170. Theres roles for UAV/RPV. CAS isn't one of them. View Quote Also curious if you would elaborate on your experiences with the "lag" inherent in RPA operations and how that impacts "danger close sorties". |
|
|
Quoted:
Curious if you would elaborate on your experiences with goat fuckers hacking the CDL and KU band. Also curious if you would elaborate on your experiences with the "lag" inherent in RPA operations and how that impacts "danger close sorties". View Quote But I'll admit, the dude who had to use a cane to walk around for a while due to what sounded vaguely like a mishap between his unit and a UAV/RPA in theater somehow? He might be a little biased. |
|
The B-24 is already standardized and doesn't need the approval BS.
Just order a couple of hundred and carpet bomb grid squares. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes That plane delivers wood
so does this one |
|
|
Quoted:
So a low-flying low-speed prop aircraft flying combat missions. Do they just not expect them to come back alive? View Quote USAF is dangerously close to making a good decision... that particular bomb is too big, but it's a start. Leave the useless guns off, ditch the twin-engined jet entrant, and get down to business. |
|
|
Quoted:
And yet attack helicopters fly even lower and slower and manage to fly CAS and live to tell the tale.... USAF is dangerously close to making a good decision... that particular bomb is too big, but it's a start. Leave the useless guns off, ditch the twin-engined jet entrant, and get down to business. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Personally? None. People I know and respect who have served several tours overseas and all they got was seething rage against the VA, and other people who have worked in the aircraft development side of things? Lots. Both sets of people know way more things about all of the above than I could ever hope to relay, and both sides have very similar arguments against a UAV/RPA solution to any CAS role. But I'll admit, the dude who had to use a cane to walk around for a while due to what sounded vaguely like a mishap between his unit and a UAV/RPA in theater somehow? He might be a little biased. View Quote There is also a "lag" when operating on our satellite links. Never once has it been a limiting factor in any tactical situation that I'm aware of. |
|
View Quote ![]() |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.