Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 12/11/2005 8:08:51 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/12/2005 4:50:04 AM EST by mjohn3006]
Let us not argue about which one is better.
Just post a picture of your main battle rifle or rifles so we can all oooh and ahhh.

Battle rifle, not assault. That means no mid-range cals like 7.62x39 or 5.56.

Mine.
FAL
7.62x51
20"
2.5x scope



ETA and of course how could I not post the king.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:13:54 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 8:14:09 AM EST by TheRedHorseman]


imbel kit/receiver
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:15:26 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:17:09 AM EST


16", Imbel, w/ Eo511.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:23:17 AM EST




Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:40:09 AM EST
Tag to post pics later.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:41:12 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 8:41:59 AM EST by HKgnnr]
Built by Rich of Century Gun Works - Imbel receiver, 18" w/ Tapco goodies



And, can't forget the best battle rifle ever designed - Springfield CMP Garand

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:50:31 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:53:38 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 9:11:32 AM EST by Different]
Here's a few from the stable:

2002 standard model Springfield Armory, Inc. M1A



1984 NFA registered full auto Springfield Armory, Inc. M1A in BHD mode



Left to right: 1989 standard model Springfield Armory, Inc. M1A and 2001 Springfield Armory, Inc. M1A Scout Squad converted to M1A Bush configuration.



1990 Super Match model Springfield Armory, Inc. M1A with NFA Registered Fisher Enterprise M14DC sound suppressor begging to be glassed



Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:54:09 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 8:55:07 AM EST by The_Beer_Slayer]
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:54:32 AM EST
I feel discrinated agenst. So...


because this is the USMC's main batle rifle.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:56:17 AM EST

Originally Posted By kc0iwx:
I feel discrinated agenst. So...
i19.photobucket.com/albums/b166/kc0iwx/DSC04453.jpg

because this is the USMC's main batle rifle.



nope, its a cheap copy with no go fast switch
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 8:59:59 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:01:07 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 9:07:50 AM EST by thedoctors308]

Originally Posted By kc0iwx:
I feel discrinated agenst. So...
i19.photobucket.com/albums/b166/kc0iwx/DSC04453.jpg

because this is the USMC's main batle rifle.



Nope.
That is an assault rifle semi auto civillian legal copy of a military style assault rifle, not an MBR.

Fixed, per TBS request.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:01:16 AM EST

Originally Posted By TheRedHorseman:

Originally Posted By kc0iwx:
I feel discrinated agenst. So...
i19.photobucket.com/albums/b166/kc0iwx/DSC04453.jpg

because this is the USMC's main batle rifle.



nope, its a cheap copy with no go fast switch



There are some seriously not cheap items on that rifle.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:07:04 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:07:12 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:08:13 AM EST

Originally Posted By The_Beer_Slayer:

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:

Originally Posted By kc0iwx:
I feel discrinated agenst. So...
i19.photobucket.com/albums/b166/kc0iwx/DSC04453.jpg

because this is the USMC's main batle rifle.



Nope.
That is an assault rifle, not an MBR.



no, it's a semi auto civillian legal copy of a military style assault rifle.




I know the difference!
Fixed it.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:09:22 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:11:20 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:11:32 AM EST

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:

Originally Posted By SteyrAUG:
photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?sAccountUnq=1729&iGalleryUnq=419&iImageUnq=28725



Bastage



Agreed. I wonder what sort of sick pleasure he gets, posting things like that on the board? Multiple examples of fine German engineering...
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:18:52 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 9:22:46 AM EST by MEDICMAN29]


Sar-48 and Imbel on imbel with burris dot.

beretta al390, and empty sixer of full sail amber ale in the background!
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:29:13 AM EST
Tagged!

By the way, some of you owe me a new pair of pants.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:33:04 AM EST

ADCO AR10





G3K on the left
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:37:11 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 9:38:05 AM EST by mayday]
I dont actually "have" this rifle yet. I just sent off a money order and cant wait to get it in the mail. Below is a picture of the rifle the owner sent me. Now I'll finally be ready for when the UN comes to git' me!

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:53:21 AM EST
Top one only, CAI 7.62x51mm CETME

Ignore the other two fine weapons in the photo.

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:53:53 AM EST
Top one is a 1903 mark 1 dated 1918 . The bayonet is a 16 inch ,it is also dated 1918. Second is a 1953 M1. The third is a m1a loaded. Last is a yugo mauser .
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 9:54:02 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 9:54:20 AM EST by TheRedHorseman]
nice
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 11:21:36 AM EST

Originally Posted By mattimeo:

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:

Originally Posted By SteyrAUG:
photos.ar15.com/WS_Content/ImageGallery/Attachments/DownloadAttach.asp?sAccountUnq=1729&iGalleryUnq=419&iImageUnq=28725



Bastage



Agreed. I wonder what sort of sick pleasure he gets, posting things like that on the board? Multiple examples of fine German engineering...





SA suffers from SDS.

AB
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 11:28:28 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 11:29:43 AM EST by protus]

FR8

few others

CETME and FR8


2a1 in 762x51

crappy pics all i had before the hurricnaes swept them out into the ICW
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 11:35:59 AM EST


Hail to the king!
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 11:40:33 AM EST


Built by me.

Fixed by the GunPlumber.

Brought out of the ban years and made beautifull by AZEX.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 11:57:19 AM EST

Originally Posted By MudBug:
www.goobage.com/pics/arms/evil_fal.jpg

Built by me.

Fixed by the GunPlumber.

Brought out of the ban years and made beautifull by AZEX.




Oh havent you heard FAL's are Junk. I tell ya what you give it to me and I'll get rid of it for ya.All Jokes aside VERY nice.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:18:41 PM EST
Crappy photo, but you get the idea.

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:28:02 PM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:37:07 PM EST
Pretty guns...
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:39:28 PM EST
Only had my C&R for 46 days...beware if you're thinking of getting one. Much worse than crack!


Sorry for the horrible photo!
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:42:17 PM EST
NEED MORE M1a's



Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:43:58 PM EST
DSA STG-58 and Armalite AR10



Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:45:48 PM EST

Originally Posted By Nefarius:
Only had my C&R for 46 days...beware if you're thinking of getting one. Much worse than crack!
i28.photobucket.com/albums/c219/KingRichard/130_3042x.jpg

Sorry for the horrible photo!



Very nice!

Ummm..... Slight hijack: Why does a "battle rifle" have to have a "full-size" round?
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:48:14 PM EST
SOCOM-16

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:48:24 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 1:23:58 PM EST by Itchy]
DSA SA58



Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:53:59 PM EST

Originally Posted By Zaphod:

Originally Posted By Nefarius:
Only had my C&R for 46 days...beware if you're thinking of getting one. Much worse than crack!
i28.photobucket.com/albums/c219/KingRichard/130_3042x.jpg

Sorry for the horrible photo!



Very nice!

Ummm..... Slight hijack: Why does a "battle rifle" have to have a "full-size" round?



Way they are classified.
The big .30's were here first, so they are considered "full size"
5.56 and 7.82x39 are considered intermediate rounds.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:54:11 PM EST
Imbel reciever.

My accessory is very expensive.

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:56:06 PM EST
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 12:57:48 PM EST

Originally Posted By thedoctors308:

Originally Posted By Zaphod:

Ummm..... Slight hijack: Why does a "battle rifle" have to have a "full-size" round?



Way they are classified.
The big .30's were here first, so they are considered "full size"
5.56 and 7.82x39 are considered intermediate rounds.




So it's simply a matter of definitions?
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 1:07:33 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 1:08:08 PM EST by steve-oh]

Originally Posted By Zaphod:
So it's simply a matter of definitions?



I guess... Even though I wouldn't want to get hit with any one of these. Supposedly the far left is the only one that can do any real damage.

Link Posted: 12/11/2005 1:15:24 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/11/2005 4:03:08 PM EST by PowerSlave]


This is what I plan to battle deer with this season........if I ever get to go!!!




I want new furniture for this one.
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 1:16:53 PM EST

Originally Posted By Nefarius:
Only had my C&R for 46 days...beware if you're thinking of getting one. Much worse than crack!
i28.photobucket.com/albums/c219/KingRichard/130_3042x.jpg

Sorry for the horrible photo!



Where did you get those K31s? They look Great!
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 1:17:58 PM EST

Originally Posted By steve-oh:

Originally Posted By Zaphod:
So it's simply a matter of definitions?



I guess... Even though I wouldn't want to get hit with any one of these. Supposedly the far left is the only one that can do any real damage.
i4.photobucket.com/albums/y103/steve--oh/insurgency10.jpg
i2.photobucket.com/albums/y46/gemdancer0/shooting114.jpg



I'll take their word for it.


So who are the young ladies?
Link Posted: 12/11/2005 1:18:25 PM EST


Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Top Top