Since when is acknowledging the existance of a supreme being a prerequisite for moral behavior?
So, the question really is...why can't people acknowledge the inherent benefit of moral behavior...its inherent goodness...without relying on the crutch...the excuse...of the supernatural?
Must the threat of eternal damnation be ones only reason to behave in a moral fashion? Sounds like extortion to me. And, if one only behaves in a moral fashion out of the extortion of one's soul, is that person truly behaving morally? I say no. The underlying principle behind one's moral behavior is every bit as important as the behavior itself.
So, should "God" be in the Pledge of Allegiance?
Should there be a Pledge of Allegiance?
I dont mind a 'Pledge really. Given that the United States is fundamentally capitalistic and I am a laissez-faire capitalist and individualist (perhaps some redundancy in that last statement..but I digress) it doesn't bother me. The United States could use a bit more patriotism. But, without any hint of theocracy. The "Under God" schtick should be taken back out.
And yes, as a preemptive comeback...the whole "In God we Trust" on our currency...get it out. Consistency consistency consistency.
Zippy The (agnostic) Wonderdog.
Quoted:
We need to keep GOD in our thoughts, and if you believe in the Constitution, in the Government. The Framers were Christians. The popular concept of the separation of church and state is a falicy. It is impossible to correctly perceive or interpret the meaning of the Constitution and indeed our body of law without a Judeo-Christian belief structure. This too is echoed in the documentation of the origins of the Nation. The humanist and anti-nationalist sentiments currently being propagated in the support of the "new world order" and "one world government" very much need to disemble the Constitution, and destroying first the existance of God (morals,ethics,responsibility to a higher authority)in government is a pre-requisite.
YES. God should be in the Pledge.
View Quote