Shepherd Smith Re: DNC hacking

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Shepherd Smith Re: DNC hacking (Page 1 of 2)

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:47:50 PM EDT

"The Trump Campaign has said that this is crazy talk. Fox News can confirm to that this is NOT crazy talk. Fox News can confirm to you that all 17 US intelligence agencies and the FBI unanimously agree that the Russians did indeed hack the DNC, and all 17 agencies have confirmed this publicly."

OK, so what the fuck is going on here. One story is that there is no such agreement. One story is that the FBI does not agree. Another story is that no intelligence agency has come out and issued any reports or made official public claims, and that this is all just anonymous leaks to the NYT and WaPo. And of course the entire intelligence community has ignored multiple congressional requests for briefing.

So what the fuck IS the truth here?

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:52:48 PM EDT

[#1]

Truth is the cocksuckers didn't care one ounce about this until their gal lost bigly.

Foxnews played a clip of Jug-Ears stating at some event that there was basically no way they could do this. This statement was made serriptitiously as my main man Trump was claiming the election and process was rigged. Late October I believe, possibly Oct 25th.

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:55:17 PM EDT

[#2]

Shep just needs to go suck some cocks and get his ass off the air. He truly sucks in more ways than one!

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:55:40 PM EDT

[#3]

Quote History

Quoted:
Truth is the cocksuckers didn't care one ounce about this until their gal lost bigly.

View Quote

This now they are trying their best to place blame else where. Although all the recounts have shown voter fraud for many extra votes for FHRC.

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:56:02 PM EDT

[#4]

Who gives a shit. None of the info hacked was disputed.

Posted: 12/19/2016 4:58:07 PM EDT

[#5]

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange denied Thursday that hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta were stolen and passed to his organization by Russian state actors.

"Our source is not the Russian government," Assange told "The Sean Hannity Show."

"So in other words, let me be clear," Hannity asked, "Russia did not give you the Podesta documents or anything from the DNC?"

"That's correct," Assange responded.

Assange's assertion contradicts the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which concluded in October that "the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails [sic] from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations."

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:00:48 PM EDT

[#6]

So...ultimate influence was that the American people were told the truth about what complete and utter shitbags the democrats were.

Funny how nothing was disputed.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:03:15 PM EDT

[#7]

"Oh no! We should redo the election because some hackers leaked THE TRUTH!"

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:03:34 PM EDT

[#8]

The majority of those 17 agencies would have no meaningful input on this issue.

In 2014 an ally told the administration that the White House and State Department email systems were being hacked by the Russians. The Russians had weeks if not months of access, and the US government never noticed. The WH email system was down for about a month. The media and Obama had little to say about this return of '80s foreign policy.

Clinton's private email server was hacked by at least 5 foreign governments. Russia was probably one of them, implying Russia has all her emails. If Russia was trying to tip the election it could have released her emails. Given that multiple governments hacked her server, there would be no way to determine which one handed them to Wikileaks.

So why would Russia hack Podesta's emails if it wanted to hurt Clinton, since they almost certainly had hers? Particularly since they could be identified as the perps, per the administration?

My guess is that the hack wasn't done by the Russian government, or else they had some other goal than the election.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:05:50 PM EDT

[#9]

Why is anyone still watching Fauxnews?

Have you not learned anything OP?

They don't deserve the ratings.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:08:26 PM EDT

[#10]

I was assured by the Democratic party(when hildabeast was winning) that there was no way the election was rigged or hacked and we should just accept the results.

*and it amuses me that their complaint is the DNC got hacked....not that votes were messed with. people voted based on accurate hacked information. WAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH. bunch of liberal hypocrits.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:08:31 PM EDT

[#11]

My Wife is PISSED that the news only reports the hacking-leaks.
NOT THEIR CONTENT!

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:08:48 PM EDT

[#12]

Quote History

Quoted:
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange denied Thursday that hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta were stolen and passed to his organization by Russian state actors.

"Our source is not the Russian government," Assange told "The Sean Hannity Show."

"So in other words, let me be clear," Hannity asked, "Russia did not give you the Podesta documents or anything from the DNC?"

"That's correct," Assange responded.

Assange's assertion contradicts the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which concluded in October that "the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails [sic] from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations."

View Quote

I saw that. Assange was adamant that the Russkies did not provide any of the info he received.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:10:23 PM EDT

[#13]

WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE THIS!!!

.......After Trump Assumes office. Just like the IRS and tea party stuff that also effected the election.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:10:45 PM EDT

[#14]

Fact: The "hacked" emails revealed media collusion with the DNC to control the news.

Fact: The "hacked" emails led to numerous firings in both the DNC and the MSM for their blatant corruption.

Fact: James O'keef(sp) videos demonstrated beyond any doubt that the DNC had organized a vast campaign to steal the election from both berntard and Trump.

Fact: The DNC/Clinton machine, as well as the federal bureaucracy have lots to fear from a Trump administration given his rhetoric, and administration picks.

Fact: All the Russia Hack bullshit is coming from sources proven to be corrupt.

So why would you believe that Russia has anything to do with this considering the above? I know Russia didn't hack shit, because the people who tell me they did, are the ones who have lied, and conspired the most to fuck my country.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:12:20 PM EDT

[#15]

I don't trust ANYTHING from ANY Federal Agency under the current Administration.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:14:21 PM EDT

[#16]

Honest Reporters would have put it like this:

A Spokesman from Hillary's Campaign said that 17 intelligence agencies told the campaign it was the Russians.

(the same thing happened with their reporting of the 18,000 people at Hillary's Columbus, OH.....(the one where someone actually counted the people there....and it was about 3k)...very few news sources actually specified that someone from Hillary's campaign told them that the Secret Service estimated 18k people...most reports either said 18k attended or the Secret Service said 18k attended...)

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:17:52 PM EDT

[#17]

PROVE IT or shut the fuck up.

STOP SPECULATING and most of all STOP SAYING THEY "HACKED THE ELECTION"

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:20:41 PM EDT

[#18]

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:20:55 PM EDT

[#19]

With any luck, Shep's colon will prolapse so severely from all the cock he takes up his ass that it drags the ground, gets hung on a rusty nail, and he contracts the most vile case of tetanus of the ass that has ever been recorded.

And I hope he gets the flu too.

Posted: 12/19/2016 5:59:32 PM EDT

[#20]

Shep (sheep) and his cohorts can't blame Wikileaks; he needs a conspiracy to push - Commies, Russia, Trump, RNC...

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:07:57 PM EDT

[#21]

Yeah. I saw his rant. To put it simply, I am not impressed. Whatever hacking they are referring to, it is clear it did not happen to the voting machines.

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:16:43 PM EDT

[#22]

Quote History

Quoted:

I saw that. Assange was adamant that the Russkies did not provide any of the info he received.

View Quote

The former British ambassador said the same. Wasn't the Russians.

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:20:16 PM EDT

[#23]

Quote History

Quoted:
Fact: The "hacked" emails revealed media collusion with the DNC to control the news.

Fact: The "hacked" emails led to numerous firings in both the DNC and the MSM for their blatant corruption.

Fact: James O'keef(sp) videos demonstrated beyond any doubt that the DNC had organized a vast campaign to steal the election from both berntard and Trump.

Fact: The DNC/Clinton machine, as well as the federal bureaucracy have lots to fear from a Trump administration given his rhetoric, and administration picks.

Fact: All the Russia Hack bullshit is coming from sources proven to be corrupt.

So why would you believe that Russia has anything to do with this considering the above? I know Russia didn't hack shit, because the people who tell me they did, are the ones who have lied, and conspired the most to fuck my country.

View Quote

Excellent post Kevv.

All the media talk about "the hacked election" is just fake news. The only thing hacked was DNC emails.

Could have been Russians, Chinese, N. Koreans or others. End of story.

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:31:20 PM EDT

[#24]

Quote History

Quoted:
Honest Reporters would have put it like this:

A Spokesman from Hillary's Campaign said that 17 intelligence agencies told the campaign it was the Russians.

(the same thing happened with their reporting of the 18,000 people at Hillary's Columbus, OH.....(the one where someone actually counted the people there....and it was about 3k)...very few news sources actually specified that someone from Hillary's campaign told them that the Secret Service estimated 18k people...most reports either said 18k attended or the Secret Service said 18k attended...)

View Quote

Glenn Greenwald had a great article about this a week or so ago when the Washington Post ran with this CIA nonsense; "The Washington Post late Friday night published an explosive story that, in many ways, is classic American journalism of the worst sort: The key claims are based exclusively on the unverified assertions of anonymous officials, who in turn are disseminating their own claims about what the CIA purportedly believes, all based on evidence that remains completely secret."

"There is still no such evidence for any of these claims. What we have instead are assertions, disseminated by anonymous people, completely unaccompanied by any evidence, let alone proof. As a result, none of the purported evidence — still — can be publicly seen, reviewed, or discussed. Anonymous claims leaked to newspapers about what the CIA believes do not constitute proof, and certainly do not constitute reliable evidence that substitutes for actual evidence that can be reviewed. Have we really not learned this lesson yet?"

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:36:08 PM EDT

[#25]

Has anyone seen an official report or statement from any of the US Intel agencies detailing any Russian hacking on the DNC?

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:53:50 PM EDT

[#26]

Quote History

Quoted:
Who gives a shit. None of the info hacked was disputed.

View Quote

Outside Government exposing socialist corruption and poor ideas.

We used to call it Radio Free Europe.........................................

I would have been perfectly happy with disposal of Osange some time ago (Ref. Chelsea Manning) but the idea that the embarrassment of the Democrats is justification for "droning" him like Hillary said, in an embassy in a allied country is just insane all the way around.

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:56:33 PM EDT

[#27]

Seth Rich was not Russian.

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:57:38 PM EDT

[#28]

As noted above, hacked and leaked FACTS possibly changed the election.

As it stands now, is there actual proof that these leaks actually changed the election?

Posted: 12/19/2016 6:58:46 PM EDT

[#29]

They were using Gmail accounts!

Hillary had a fucking server in the bathroom with a spare roll of toilet paper on top, and a cup and toothbrush in the CD Drive Tray.

Do you think if a .gov address was used, it might have been a little more secure? Someone with a fucking job in online computer security looking over their shoulder and saying "No, you don't do that" when they started opening pop-ups from the gay porn sites?

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:01:54 PM EDT

[#30]

Quoted:

So what the fuck IS the truth here?

View Quote

The truth is the media is focusing on the hacking, which happened long before Nov. 9, to delegitimize Trump's election instead of focusing on the content of the emails.

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:11:17 PM EDT

[#31]

This is all from spearfished e-mails, right?

That's not even a hack, really. No way to tell who did it.

If the CIA has other information, fuck your sources. Put up or shut up.

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:15:28 PM EDT

[#32]

The Russians tipped us off as to the DNC hacking the elections along with their other crimes? that explanation I'd buy.

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:18:09 PM EDT

[#33]

Screw it - TRUMP PRESIDENT NOW - thank God!

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:37:28 PM EDT

[#34]

I LOVE how all the assholes going on about the "DNC Hacking" and how it threw the election side step the fact that the hacking exposed CORRUPTION, CHEATING and ILLEGAL ACTS by the Hildog and her minions.

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:53:31 PM EDT

[#35]

I love how everybody here assumes Russians in track suites would just pull up in their G-Wagon and drop the files off at the Ecuadorian embassy. They would use cutouts they are not stupid.

Assange probably has no idea where the info came from.

Honestly the Russians or their freelancers probably DID hack the DNC. All the different agencies and most of the congress, Republican and Democrat alike, seem to agree on that fact.

We need to stop acting like morons. It just makes us look stupid. Russia has been hacking everything for years. That is open source info. The likely hood that they didn't hack it is very small.

Where we need to be fighting is the idea that there hacking somehow effected the outcome. I dont think it did. We need to say so what and point out that Obama allowed it to happen.

And that Trump would have won anyway.

Posted: 12/19/2016 7:57:44 PM EDT

[#36]

Well if the Dems weren't exposed as such utter corrupt douchebags by their emails the hacking wouldn't matter. Technically it looks like the dumb fucks were duped by a stupid fucking phishing scam and had disgruntled members leaking info. Yes, the libs are the sophisticated ones we need running the country - fucking morons that think they're smarter than everyone else, but look more like dumb & dumber.

The libs and the MSM didn't give two shits when Sarah Palin's email was hacked (by the son of a dem politician no less) or when Trump's tax info was illegally leaked.

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:02:02 PM EDT

[#37]

Shep smokes dick

If true,I love how Russia hacked the DNC..... I applaud it.

FU DNC
FBHO
FHRC

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:04:32 PM EDT

[#38]

Quote History

Quoted:
I love how everybody here assumes Russians in track suites would just pull up in their G-Wagon and drop the files off at the Ecuadorian embassy. They would use cutouts they are not stupid.

Assange probably has no idea where the info came from.

Honestly the Russians or their freelancers probably DID hack the DNC. All the different agencies and most of the congress, Republican and Democrat alike, seem to agree on that fact.

We need to stop acting like morons. It just makes us look stupid. Russia has been hacking everything for years. That is open source info. The likely hood that they didn't hack it is very small.

Where we need to be fighting is the idea that there hacking somehow effected the outcome. I dont think it did. We need to say so what and point out that Obama allowed it to happen.

And that Trump would have won anyway.

View Quote

Well then present the facts to the American public. There should be nothing classified regarding the DNC crap, besides it's all been fucking dumped online already.

Until they present some facts this whole 17 agency crap just sounds like the global warming consensus crap.

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:10:32 PM EDT

[#39]

One reason why some SJW hate Russia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Russia

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:17:44 PM EDT

[#40]

Quote History

Quoted:
This is all from spearfished e-mails, right?

That's not even a hack, really. No way to tell who did it.

If the CIA has other information, fuck your sources. Put up or shut up.

View Quote

They refuse to put up or shut up.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/12/14/intelligence-officials-refuse-brief-house-panel-russian-hacking/95453412/

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:27:17 PM EDT

[#41]

Releasing internal DNC emails is not the same as hacking voting machines. They need to trying to confuse the public. Because they're pretty much saying "Russia hacked the election!".

That is very misleading and dangerous to our stability. Because people will assume it means an outside source controls who the votes count for.

The Russians did not hack voting machines. And the Democrats who were all terrified of Trump not accepting the election results, because they were so sure if victory. They need to stop being hypocritical.

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:33:45 PM EDT

[#42]

Quote History

Quoted:
I love how everybody here assumes Russians in track suites would just pull up in their G-Wagon and drop the files off at the Ecuadorian embassy. They would use cutouts they are not stupid.

Assange probably has no idea where the info came from.

Honestly the Russians or their freelancers probably DID hack the DNC. All the different agencies and most of the congress, Republican and Democrat alike, seem to agree on that fact.

We need to stop acting like morons. It just makes us look stupid. Russia has been hacking everything for years. That is open source info. The likely hood that they didn't hack it is very small.

Where we need to be fighting is the idea that there hacking somehow effected the outcome. I dont think it did. We need to say so what and point out that Obama allowed it to happen.

And that Trump would have won anyway.

View Quote

I don't think anyone with a bit of common sense thinks the Russkie State was not trying to hack the DNC, RNC, and any other potential source of intel. That's really not the question.

Based on the reported JV level security of the DNC servers one would assume a host of hackers were running amok in those DNC servers.

Who, of a multitude of potential insiders and hackers, leaked the intel to Wikileaks and why are the real questions.

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:34:55 PM EDT

[#43]

Quote History

Quoted:
Shep just needs to go suck some cocks and get his ass off the air. He truly sucks in more ways than one!

View Quote

Yep, he needs to go back to the DR and get airtight.

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:35:10 PM EDT

[#44]

Quote History

Quoted:
Why is anyone still watching Fauxnews?

Have you not learned anything OP?

They don't deserve the ratings.

View Quote

INB4 someone spouts off with "but but but, Fox News is good people, they're conservative!"

Posted: 12/19/2016 8:36:56 PM EDT

[#45]

Quote History

Quoted:
I love how everybody here assumes Russians in track suites would just pull up in their G-Wagon and drop the files off at the Ecuadorian embassy. They would use cutouts they are not stupid.

Assange probably has no idea where the info came from.

Honestly the Russians or their freelancers probably DID hack the DNC. All the different agencies and most of the congress, Republican and Democrat alike, seem to agree on that fact.

We need to stop acting like morons. It just makes us look stupid. Russia has been hacking everything for years. That is open source info. The likely hood that they didn't hack it is very small.

Where we need to be fighting is the idea that there hacking somehow effected the outcome. I dont think it did. We need to say so what and point out that Obama allowed it to happen.

And that Trump would have won anyway.

View Quote

I don't believe Russia hacked it and then turned it over to wikileaks to hurt Hillary. I posted why in an email above, but it is basically that they almost certainly have all of Clinton's emails from her server and also were in the WH and State systems back in '14, and consequently have much more to release on her then the Podesta hack. I don't doubt the Russians also hacked Podesta, I just don't see why they would use this to try to hurt Clinton.

Further I don't see why they would want to hurt her. She's a known quantity, she's weak, and they have tons of stuff on her.