

Posted: 8/22/2017 11:51:53 AM EDT
https://federalnewsradio.com/defense-news/2017/08/investigation-navy-shipyard-wasted-21-million-building-off-the-books-police-force/slide/1/
For the better part of a dozen years, a group of employees and managers at the Navy’s largest public shipyard operated what amounted to an unsanctioned, off-the-books police force, equipping it with illegally or improperly obtained weapons, vehicles and fuel, wasting an estimated $21 million in public funds in the process. Those are the findings of an internal command-directed investigation performed by the Naval Sea Systems Command’s inspector general, which undertook an in-depth review of the case after military criminal investigators and federal prosecutors declined to do so. The investigation, which was conducted in 2014, has not been previously disclosed. But to date, none of the shipyard officials involved in the enterprise have faced punishment or prosecution, partly because most of them opted to retire before the investigation began, and millions of dollars in unaccounted-for property remains missing. The case has its origins, investigators say, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, when agencies were flush with cash to spend on improving their security and few were inclined to question any spending that was ostensibly intended to protect federal facilities and employees. In that environment, the officials in charge of a group of unarmed security guards, whose job was supposed to be patrolling the shipyard’s internal work areas, began beefing up the workforce and outfitting it with firearms, boats, law enforcement badges, vehicles (complete with fictitious license plates) and an armored personnel carrier that they emblazoned with the word “police.” “These folks are not law enforcement, but they wanted to be, and all of their actions were done to become a law enforcement organization,” said Peter Lintner, the deputy director of investigations at NAVSEA. |
|
after military criminal investigators and federal prosecutors declined to do so View Quote |
|
Yeah, I can see that happening at NorFucking Vagina.
#dontworkthereanymore |
|
So basically after 9/11 the security guys decided to not be a soft target and are now getting in trouble for it?
|
|
So the government investigated themselves and decided no charges were warranted. Sounds like the FBI and the Clintons and Fast and Furious. Typical government.
|
|
|
That reads like an over dramatization. The group in charge of security created a security force. And bought boats and vehicles for said security to drive.
|
|
Odd.
But did they do anything nefarious or out of bounds (like traffic enforcement or wandering around outside their area "fighting crime"?) What a strange story. |
|
|
|
|
I read the OP as song lyrics and came up with a pretty awesome ballad, if I do say so myself
|
|
Quoted:
$21M worth of wasteful spending is okay with you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's what it sounds like. They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it Is $21 million the total amount they spent or are $21 million worth of guns and gear missing and in someone's closet? Big difference. |
|
|
One of those fake cops with unauthorized weapons wouldn't happen to be the guy that helped end the Navy Yard shooting, huh? How dare they provide security with weapons and vehicles!
|
|
Building a hedge around the APC and emptying the warehouse the day before the auditor comes through is some good stuff. HBO needs to jump on this, great source material for a movie or series.
Handing out a thousand challenge coins was a bold move. |
|
Quoted:
That's about all I have too. John Adams warned that this Constitution was only created for a moral and religious people....not the scum bags that actually weasel their way into power via any and all corrupt ways possible. ![]() View Quote President Trump took them by surprise. |
|
|
Quoted:
That's what it sounds like. They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically after 9/11 the security guys decided to not be a soft target and are now getting in trouble for it? They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it (Which is a euphemism for stolen) |
|
Quoted:
That's what it sounds like. They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it View Quote No problem there? Deliberately hiding vehicles from inspectors? Making plates for them? Driving them with no insurance? Stealing the gas for them? What about the $4M worth of this stuff? “None of that stuff is on an inventory, and it’s all highly-pilferable things,” Lintner said. “These are high-cost tools, night vision goggles, sniper scopes, and there was no accountability for any of it" No problem with any of that? |
|
|
Quoted:
$21M worth of wasteful spending is okay with you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's what it sounds like. They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it Maybe they did a good job! |
|
Quoted:
Referring to democracy...every corrupt man gets a vote they vote for candidates like themselves....why we got Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama President Trump took them by surprise. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's about all I have too. John Adams warned that this Constitution was only created for a moral and religious people....not the scum bags that actually weasel their way into power via any and all corrupt ways possible. ![]() President Trump took them by surprise. ![]() But in this thread.....troops take their ques from their leaders....no? |
|
|
Quoted:
One of those fake cops with unauthorized weapons wouldn't happen to be the guy that helped end the Navy Yard shooting, huh? How dare they provide security with weapons and vehicles! View Quote |
|
They keep saying "police". Did they actually try to arrest anyone?
If they had put "Security" on the side of the APC would that have been better? |
|
Quoted:
One of those fake cops with unauthorized weapons wouldn't happen to be the guy that helped end the Navy Yard shooting, huh? How dare they provide security with weapons and vehicles! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
$21M worth of wasteful spending is okay with you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Was it wasteful? Maybe they did a good job! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's what it sounds like. They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it Maybe they did a good job! In that way, the security specialists allegedly obtained at least 92 vehicles and other equipment worth more than $4 million without any valid mission requirement — including a flatbed tractor-trailer to move the vehicles around. To this day, all of that property is unaccounted for, according to the IG’s office. NAVFAC refused to sanction the ones the security specialists obtained through DLA’s surplus lot, and advised them to send them back. ...
“The security department said, ‘Roger that,’ and then developed a license plate manufacturing plant in the shipyard, made their own plates and put those on the vehicles,” “When they got to the gate at FLETC, they were denied entrance because the plates weren’t any good — they’d made their own,” Lintner said. “So their solution was to back around the corner, put another valid government plate on from another vehicle, and they drove it right into FLETC.” Gasoline presented another potential hurdle, since there was no clear way to finance and account for the fueling of vehicles the Navy didn’t technically own. But again, the security team found a solution. The shipyard had a valid work order with a fuel delivery company that regularly visited the base to replenish the yard’s gasoline-powered lighting devices, so the employees allegedly got the tanker trunk driver to also top off their vehicle fleet’s gas tanks on every visit. The IG says not only were the vehicles not properly licensed, neither were their drivers. And needless to say, none of the unregistered vehicles were insured. One such vessel — a high-speed interdiction boat — was bought for $150,000 with a government purchase card, and the team paid at least $206,000 more to tie it up at a nearby private marina instead of at the shipyard itself, where there was abundant dock space for small boats. the organization made several other highly-questionable buys, including federal law enforcement badges costing several hundreds of dollars each and 1,000 challenge coins which employees “handed out like candy.” ![]() |
|
I want to hear the whole story. Yard is charged with beefing up security. They did. The question is did they do it in a more or less cost effective measure than they should have. My bet is they avoided a metric butload of beuracratic red tape and did he job under budget. Navy not prosecuting because in the end they relize that the job was performed and either exceeded standard or was under budget or both.
--- or the Navy realizes how stupid this makes them look and did not want even more publicity. |
|
Quoted:
I want to hear the whole story. Yard is charged with beefing up security. They did. The question is did they do it in a more or less cost effective measure than they should have. My bet is they avoided a metric butload of beuracratic red tape and did he job under budget. Navy not prosecuting because in the end they relize that the job was performed and either exceeded standard or was under budget or both. View Quote |
|
|
The investigation, which was conducted in 2014, has not been previously disclosed. But to date, none of the shipyard officials involved in the enterprise have faced punishment or prosecution, partly because most of them opted to retire before the investigation began, and millions of dollars in unaccounted-for property remains missing.
So, you just have to retire in order to escape prosecution, is that a thing now? ![]() |
|
Slightly. Although since their command refused to license them and told them that they had to be returned there would still be problems.
|
|
Quoted:
I want to hear the whole story. Yard is charged with beefing up security. They did. The question is did they do it in a more or less cost effective measure than they should have. My bet is they avoided a metric butload of beuracratic red tape and did he job under budget. Navy not prosecuting because in the end they relize that the job was performed and either exceeded standard or was under budget or both. --- or the Navy realizes how stupid this makes them look and did not want even more publicity. View Quote There is absolutely nothing that goes on in there that could be misconstrued as being cost effective. |
|
So the whole no dog shooting is what blew their cover.
Ha ha |
|
Quoted:
I want to hear the whole story. Yard is charged with beefing up security. They did. The question is did they do it in a more or less cost effective measure than they should have. My bet is they avoided a metric butload of beuracratic red tape and did he job under budget. Navy not prosecuting because in the end they relize that the job was performed and either exceeded standard or was under budget or both. --- or the Navy realizes how stupid this makes them look and did not want even more publicity. View Quote ![]() The Navy not prosecuting means that someone with pull and connections was in on it and swept it under the rug. This is pure corruption. |
|
Quoted:
Yes it's important to avoid red tape while you're stealing millions of dollars worth of gear from the taxpayers. ![]() The Navy not prosecuting means that someone with pull and connections was in on it and swept it under the rug. This is pure corruption. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I want to hear the whole story. Yard is charged with beefing up security. They did. The question is did they do it in a more or less cost effective measure than they should have. My bet is they avoided a metric butload of beuracratic red tape and did he job under budget. Navy not prosecuting because in the end they relize that the job was performed and either exceeded standard or was under budget or both. --- or the Navy realizes how stupid this makes them look and did not want even more publicity. ![]() The Navy not prosecuting means that someone with pull and connections was in on it and swept it under the rug. This is pure corruption. |
|
92 vehicles for 4 million dollars... that is like 45k per vehicle... that is a bargain....
|
|
We see again the purity and competence of the federal government.
|
|
Quoted:
They keep saying "police". Did they actually try to arrest anyone? If they had put "Security" on the side of the APC would that have been better? View Quote I didn't know the TBL thing extended to security guards playing dress up with taxpayer money. |
|
Quoted:
92 vehicles for 4 million dollars... that is like 45k per vehicle... that is a bargain.... View Quote "Losing" weapons & gear however is another story.... |
|
Quoted:
Did you miss the part about millions in missing gear? (Which is a euphemism for stolen) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically after 9/11 the security guys decided to not be a soft target and are now getting in trouble for it? They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it (Which is a euphemism for stolen) |
|
Quoted:
Right, people getting worked up about $21mil, but that was since 9/11, shit that's light for gov spending... I wish other departments were that frugal. "Losing" weapons & gear however is another story.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
92 vehicles for 4 million dollars... that is like 45k per vehicle... that is a bargain.... "Losing" weapons & gear however is another story.... "It's only $21,000,000" |
|
Quoted:
Is it? And why does your avatar say renegade? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically after 9/11 the security guys decided to not be a soft target and are now getting in trouble for it? They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it (Which is a euphemism for stolen) To this day, all of that property is unaccounted for, according to the IG’s office. |
|
Quoted:
Is it? And why does your avatar say renegade? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically after 9/11 the security guys decided to not be a soft target and are now getting in trouble for it? They might get hung out to try for labeling themselves as police, but I don't see an issue with the rest of it (Which is a euphemism for stolen) |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2022 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.