Quoted:
wait. this was another remand?
My over-caffienated 40-second skim suggests that they did not turn over the law but rather said it did not reply in this instance, essentially because the father was nothing more than a baby-daddy and there was no extant family to break up.
He was given a no-contact order before the child was even born, and was deployed (or about to deploy, can't remember for sure) when he found out she was being put up for adoption. Kind of makes it hard to establish the whole "parental relationship" when the mother won't let you. He wasn't just some baby-daddy, he was a father who wanted to keep his daughter.
The ICWA was written for a very damn good reason with lessons learned the extremely hard way. My wife and son are native. The father and daughter here got screwed even though he had a federal law on his side specifically to protect him from this. Goes to show that
nothing can protect you from a government that feels like you should lose.