User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:18:59 AM EDT
[#1]
After seeing the pictures, it just confirms that she has absolutely no class.
SBG |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:19:48 AM EDT
[#2]
This dumbass gets far too much attention. Pay her no mind, and she will just fade away..
F#ck her! --VT |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:20:03 AM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:21:50 AM EDT
[#4]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:22:27 AM EDT
[#5]
Babe......I got you babe........I got you babe...... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:23:39 AM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:29:53 AM EDT
[#7]
Yeah, that was the exact same outfit that she wore to the State of the Union. I think anyone who wears a t-shirt to such an event should be drug out of the building by their hair kicking and screaming. Show respect for the event and the office and have some class. SBG |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:36:45 AM EDT
[#8]
The media whore just needs to fade away.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:38:42 AM EDT
[#9]
She is from Kaliphonia, and you people act suprised!?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:39:37 AM EDT
[#10]
But it's all about her son!!!  I wonder if she even remembers that he died, or what his name was? Cuz for damned sure it has been all about her ever since. ETA: Case in point, some of you forgot about that, huh? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:40:11 AM EDT
[#11]
She goes above and beyond the norm as far as whackos go in California.. Damn cunt. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:42:06 AM EDT
[#12]
No SHE violated the dress code. Jesus.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:45:55 AM EDT
[#13]
She was invited bt Rep.Lynn Woolsey from California ,her website has her reaction to Sheehan's arrest.
Woolsey Statement Regarding Cindy Sheehan February 1, 2006 WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. Representative Lynn Woolsey (D-Petaluma) today issued the following statement regarding Cindy Sheehan’s arrest in the gallery of the House of Representatives before the State of the Union address. Mrs. Sheehan was Rep. Lynn Woolsey’s guest to the President’s State of the Union address. “Since when is free speech conditional on whether you agree with the President? Cindy Sheehan, who gave her own flesh and blood for this disastrous war, did not violate any rules of the House of Representatives. She merely wore a shirt that highlighted the human cost of the Iraq war and expressed a view different than that of the President. Free speech and the First Amendment exist to protect dissenting statements like Ms. Sheehan’s last night. “Stifling the truth will not blind Americans to the immorality of sending young Americans to die in an unnecessary war, against a nation that posed no threat to our security. The President's speech last night was yet another attempt to distort history, as he suggested -- once again -- that the 9/11 terrorists came from Iraq. Everyone knows this is not true. We must not be afraid to say that the emperor has no clothes. It's time to bring our troops home.” How many mistruths can you spot? Friggen California Liberal Moonbats. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:47:00 AM EDT
[#14]
Yeah, don't lump us in with that bag of crap. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:47:19 AM EDT
[#15]
Can someone chop the photo of her sitting down at the table to say 2245 pornos?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:47:54 AM EDT
[#16]
Oh I see...she was just hot from climbing stairs so she took her jacket off and what do you know...she forgot about having that T-shirt on underneath. I'm sure see would have zipped her jacket back up immediately once she noticed it.
Is anyone out there, even hard core libs, stupid enough to believe that???? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:50:31 AM EDT
[#17]
I found one!!  Someone with a pro-war shirt was also asked to leave. But I do think it's a clear violation of the First Amendment to ask them to leave on those grounds. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:54:47 AM EDT
[#18]
when will they get it right? (never) it is freedom of speech, not "free" speech....geez
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:56:35 AM EDT
[#19]
Sheehan's rep used her for political gain (she had to know Sheehan would do something stupid if she showed) and Sheehan played right along. Pathetic to use someone. More pathetic to continually allow yourself to be used while convincing yourself it is all about you. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:58:54 AM EDT
[#20]
I disagree if the rules are applied equally to all. The speech is about the president's address, not every idiot's pet cause. If the rule was not in place it would be an even bigger circus than it already is. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:59:34 AM EDT
[#21]
Here's a hotlink for the people that are too lazy... DO NOT HOTLINK THIS STUFF |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:03:08 PM EDT
[#22]
Leftists are going to sue w/o grounds anyway, so the JBT's might as well beat them with nightsticks!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:03:15 PM EDT
[#23]
Sheehan's demanor & personality leave no question in my mind as to why her (RIP) son signed up. He wasn't gonna grow any chest hair living under the same roof w/ a "mommies forever" apologist.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:03:21 PM EDT
[#24]
fyi: we usually do not hotlink to sites of the DU persuasion.... |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:04:23 PM EDT
[#25]
Agreed, but I still believe it is an illegal rule. Political speech is exactly what the 1st is about. Nevermind that the SCOTUS has decided that the 1A doesn't really exist anymore. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:11:34 PM EDT
[#26]
Her son who was killed while on duty in Iraq was also from Calif... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:15:55 PM EDT
[#27]
I clicked on the link just to see who registered BanEdSr.com. 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:18:55 PM EDT
[#28]
I read that Cindy Sheehan hadn't had custody of her son since he was 7 years old, when as a result of a divorce, he was in his fathers custody No wonder the father divorced the moonbat..........and another just recently divorced her crazy ass This hooker is nuttier than a squirrel turd |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:20:15 PM EDT
[#29]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:21:45 PM EDT
[#30]
Well, now, that looks like a formal, professional gathering. Did you get some local high school cheerleaders to make that sign for you? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:26:09 PM EDT
[#31]
Truth. I can imagine it now... 1812, and every kook at a formal political event is wearing a shirt with "End the war with Britain now! No blood for freedom!" stenciled on it. If I was invited to the State of the Union address I sure as hell wouldn't wear my "Vote from the rooftops" t-shirt. That's just asinine. Maybe next year they can sell banner space to every PAC that is interested? |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:27:21 PM EDT
[#32]
I don't think you would likely find anyone here who thought it OK to interrupt President Clinton during his SOTU speach. I do not believe that causing a comotion during a state of the union speach should be treated as acceptable behaviour. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:29:15 PM EDT
[#33]
Well, I stand corrected. Feel bad for Dad. Two divorces doesn't surprise me. Two marriages does. 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:29:23 PM EDT
[#34]
Agreed. She needs to just go the hell away already. Banish her to France or something? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:30:59 PM EDT
[#35]
Unless something happened that I haven't heard about, she didn't interrupt anyone.  She had a shirt with a slogan on it. It isn't like she tried to shout the President down or anything. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:32:51 PM EDT
[#36]
Maybe I missed something, but I thought she was removed before his speech even began. She didn't interrupt anything.And are you saying that one citizen's first amendment rights are more important than another's just because you disagree with their message? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:36:50 PM EDT
[#37]
She should have just STFU, sat there, and the cameras would have been on her 24/7
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:37:42 PM EDT
[#38]
Why hasn't someone taken one for the team and killed Sheehan yet? And why isn't Mrs. Young running for president?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:39:30 PM EDT
[#39]
The whole country has been ignoring her and she still won't go away. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:46:44 PM EDT
[#40]
She violated rules of the House of Representatives, you are bound by the House's rules when you enter their Chamber. If she wanted to protest, she could do it out on the steps of Capitol hill, which would be the proper venue not in the House Chamber. Horseface was invited in by a Congressman, who is probably getting scolded by the Speaker of the House for being a jackass. Pissing off the Speaker isn't very smart. BTW, SCOTUS cannot rule in any fashion against those rules, Separation of Powers prevents the Judicial branch from interfering with what rules the House and Senate operate under. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:49:38 PM EDT
[#41]
The biggest issue is that SCOTUS has ruled over and over again that it is appropriate to enact "time, place and manner" restrictions on speech. Its a necessary qualification, otherwise it would be unconstitutional _not_ to specifically invite moonbats to every government veneration and allow them to interrupt, shout down, and trivialize it. Having accepted an invitation to the State of the Union, she accepted the rules. (Hell, they're printed right on the access pass). |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:55:08 PM EDT
[#42]
Well, if you would bother to check the facts before engaging your mouth, you would know that they also removed Beverly Young, wife of Rep Bill Young's wife for having a T-shirt on with an opposite message:
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,183392,00.html Instead of being so quick to defend leftwing lunatics, try reading. ETA: I see that you did realize someone else had been asked to leave, but yet you continue with the nonsensical crap about "are you saying that one citizen's first amendment rights are more important than another's just because you disagree with their message?". It is as if you read it but it did not register. They asked someone else to leave who had the opposite message, yet you persist with the bullshit. Obviously, your question was answered (apparently not the way you liked) by the fact that they did ask someone else to leave. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:56:01 PM EDT
[#43]
The fact that dad got custody should tell people a lot about her and it's not good. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 12:59:16 PM EDT
[#44]
So, are her First Amendment rights more important than the President's. I guess you think it is within her First Amendment rights to infringe on the President's and other's First Amendment rights. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 1:11:04 PM EDT
[#45]
A lot of us here will contribute to a legal defense fund. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 1:21:12 PM EDT
[#46]
Out of respect for the dead soldier that probably still loved his goofy mom, just leave her alone.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 1:47:59 PM EDT
[#47]
She does not love him. She loves herself. Her son fought and died for the very things that his mother is espousing as evil. He re-enlisted. He wanted to go back. Her son believed in this cause and she is using his death to help promote the opposite. She does not love him or she would have honored him and his beliefs. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 1:54:41 PM EDT
[#48]
or Venezuela, with her buddy Hugo 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 3:41:17 PM EDT
[#49]
She needs to STFU, her son signed a contract, took an oath and did his duty. He died serving his country, she needs to stop disgracing his sacrifice by running her piehole.
As a Soldier I get very angry over this "My son/daughter died for nothing, blah blah blah". There were adults and voluntarily signed up and performed their duty, STFU. If you are not a Vet, STFU. She needed to have her ass beat a long time ago. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/1/2006 3:43:17 PM EDT
[#50]
I am not a vet, why do I need to STFU?
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
