Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:15 PM EDT
SUPREMES: STATES CAN'T FORCE VOTERS TO PROVE CITIZENSHIP
"...and then they gave away their sovereignty."


 
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:36 PM EDT
first
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:17:54 PM EDT
cant see shit
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:19:05 PM EDT
Error establishing a database connection
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:19:09 PM EDT
AHHHHHHHHHHH... Real Monsters.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:20:06 PM EDT
Hillary's got this all wrapped up now.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:20:46 PM EDT
What the fuck?!?

In on 1.

ETA: Original linky no worky.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:21:07 PM EDT
Onion.....
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:21:12 PM EDT
I love living a free, Constitutional Republic that is ruled by the whims of 5 people in black robes.



God Bless America
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:22:15 PM EDT
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:22:58 PM EDT
BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS





The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”


 






eta:

Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:23:08 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
cant see shit
View Quote

Sounds like an ADA complaint
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:24:05 PM EDT
What case?
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:24:18 PM EDT
Simple solution. The states run their state and local elections in accordance with state law and on state property, but when it comes to electing federal officials hand the keys over to the feds and let them hold their elections on federal property. That will solve the solution pretty quickly unless I'm missing something here.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:29:55 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS



The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”

 







eta:

Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

View Quote




 
How often are elections of any consequence held where a federal office isn't on the ballot? They can deny illegal aliens the right to vote on bond proposals or local referendums but they can't require proof of citizenship when voting for Congress or the President?




Why am I not comforted by this?
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:33:57 PM EDT

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
If the thread title is so poorly worded as this one, its not a dupe.  You little dupe police need to show some intelligence.



 
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:37:42 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”
 



eta:
Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.
View Quote


Still means they don't have to provide proof before registering. Illegals can still vote for president with this decision.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:39:46 PM EDT
Holy fuck...
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:41:24 PM EDT
What it means is that  state law can't be used to change the federal forms.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:41:56 PM EDT
Nevermind
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:46:40 PM EDT

Link Posted: 6/29/2015 5:47:13 PM EDT
Error establishing a database connection
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 6:01:04 PM EDT
Fucked we be....
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 6:02:22 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
BEFORE EVERYONE FREAKS THE FUCK OUT.... READ THIS

The Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case,” he added, "we do have a small limited loophole.” The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship,” he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections.”
 



eta:
Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.
View Quote


They are also waiting on a ruing from the 11th circuit before they see the case. There was no Circuit Split ruling so there was no reason to hear the case. Be paitent. It will go before SCOTUS, just not right now.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 6:04:55 PM EDT
And in other news, Obama is late paying his KKK dues.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 8:05:42 PM EDT
You could power this country if you hooked a genearator up to our spinning Forefathers.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 8:10:28 PM EDT
Black robed retards. These 5 idiots have been busy destroying America lately, no?

Link Posted: 6/29/2015 8:11:11 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Black robed retards. These 5 idiots have been busy destroying America lately, no?

View Quote


Heller?
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 8:20:36 PM EDT
Interestingly, Arizona has never asked me to prove I'm a citizen and I vote.
An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator.

If you are the system administrator please click here to find out more about this error.