User Panel
Glad to see some one give a review
As much as I like .243 I'm really interested in the 6.5cm one. Have you taken it apart yet?, what's the barrel on it, like a ar10 one without the gashole? How's the trigger feel? |
|
I'm really tempted to get one in 6.5 creedmoor and I don't even like bolt actions that much.
|
|
Quoted:
Glad to see some one give a review As much as I like .243 I'm really interested in the 6.5cm one. Have you taken it apart yet?, what's the barrel on it, like a ar10 one without the gashole? How's the trigger feel? View Quote I haven't taken it apart yet. The trigger feels great once you get the insert depressed. The insert is thin enough to be a bit sharp. |
|
So is it safe to say that this rifle is a "tartered up" bolt gun, or scout gun?
|
|
what was Mace charging for them? I am really on the fence. I wish they hadnt gone with such long barrels. With the powders available today, there is almost no reason for a long barrel. I am thinking 18" in 308 and 20" max in the 243 and 6.5cm. The cost of having the barrel cut and rethreaded makes the deal a whole lot less sweet.
|
|
|
|
Anyone know if they plan to offer these with a left-handed action?
|
|
I'm not fond of the look, but I haven't read anyone who doesn't say they perform, and it's got me thinking.
|
|
Quoted:
I'm not fond of the look, but I haven't read anyone who doesn't say they perform, and it's got me thinking. View Quote The look is better than your typical tube gun. I'd prefer it in a tan. As a rifle shot a lot while laying in the sun, tan would be much cooler in many parts of the country. |
|
Thanks for the review! Congrats on the rifle!
Question: did you do a barrel break-in or just shot the groups out of the box? |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Thanks for the review! Congrats on the rifle! Question: did you do a barrel break-in or just shot the groups out of the box? View Quote I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. |
|
How accurate are you with a comparable custom built gun? Or have you shot one? Your groupings and seeming comfort with precision shooting suggests that you have past experiences.
|
|
Good review. I'm planning on doing some load development tomorrow.
I haven't taken mine apart yet, but it is not an AR barrel minus a gas port. |
|
Quoted: How much do those go for? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The look is better than your typical tube gun. I'd prefer it in a tan. As a rifle shot a lot while laying in the sun, tan would be much cooler in many parts of the country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm not fond of the look, but I haven't read anyone who doesn't say they perform, and it's got me thinking. The look is better than your typical tube gun. I'd prefer it in a tan. As a rifle shot a lot while laying in the sun, tan would be much cooler in many parts of the country. It's growing on me. And as an Arizonan who's picked up metal shit lying outside in the summer... Completely concur. |
|
Quoted:
I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks for the review! Congrats on the rifle! Question: did you do a barrel break-in or just shot the groups out of the box? I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. Remington has a great basis in the MSR. First they have to 1) admit that the 700 needs to evolve or go away 2) get the EXCELLENT tech in their defense division to the commercial market |
|
Quoted:
Like I said in the other thread: This is a game changer. View Quote Agreed. These have the distinct possibility of become the "Glock" of precision guns. Capable in it's factory form, but easily modified. Once options and aftermarket parts are available, I think you'll see guys buying them and cannibalizing the receiver sets for completely custom builds. The SR25 mag compatibility alone will make these popular. Having 20-25 rounds on tap will be a complete game changer for some bolt rifle competitions. |
|
Quoted:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1774204_Ruger_Precision_Rifle_Reviews.html&page=1#i54891554 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How much do those go for? Thanks Awesome price...I'm very interested. |
|
Quoted:
It's a tarted up bolt gun designed for accuracy, precision, and long range. It's too heavy to be a scout gun unless you're Paul Bunyan strong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So is it safe to say that this rifle is a "tartered up" bolt gun, or scout gun? It's a tarted up bolt gun designed for accuracy, precision, and long range. It's too heavy to be a scout gun unless you're Paul Bunyan strong. Although I guess you could for for a shorter, lightweight barrel, lightweight rail and lightweight stock. Or you could go for heavy, stable components for a target rifle. That, to my mind, is the big advantage to this rifle. |
|
Quoted:
How accurate are you with a comparable custom built gun? Or have you shot one? Your groupings and seeming comfort with precision shooting suggests that you have past experiences. View Quote I shot in college. I coached after grad school. In high power, I'm a High Master with the service rifle. I'm a recent Distinguished Pistol Shot. I need one more medal for Distinguished Rifle. I don't shoot much with a scope or from a bench. My techniques in these areas could use some polish. My fundamentals are solid though. My day job allows me resources to pursue my passions. I'm very lucky. What I lack in talent, I make up in desire. |
|
Quoted:
Although I guess you could for for a shorter, lightweight barrel, lightweight rail and lightweight stock. Or you could go for heavy, stable components for a target rifle. That, to my mind, is the big advantage to this rifle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So is it safe to say that this rifle is a "tartered up" bolt gun, or scout gun? It's a tarted up bolt gun designed for accuracy, precision, and long range. It's too heavy to be a scout gun unless you're Paul Bunyan strong. Although I guess you could for for a shorter, lightweight barrel, lightweight rail and lightweight stock. Or you could go for heavy, stable components for a target rifle. That, to my mind, is the big advantage to this rifle. I'm thinking with a 16" bbl and some recontouring, a MOE stock, and the right handguard selection you could strip some serious weight off. I don't think that it will ever be a lightweight hunting rifle, but it could easily be more manageable for that role. |
|
|
Is the magazine well part of the chassis aluminum or plastic?
How solid is the buttstock end of the rifle? Do all the parts clamp tight so there is no wiggle? |
|
Quoted:
I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks for the review! Congrats on the rifle! Question: did you do a barrel break-in or just shot the groups out of the box? I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. Thanks. I have some doubts as well, even though some of the claims make sense. I have a R700 with a Macree Precision stock and love it. However, this new Ruger rifle is giving me thoughts about a second precision model. If I jump in it will be a 308. Despite all the 6.5cm accolades I'm still for minimum calibers inventory. |
|
Quoted:
I'm thinking with a 16" bbl and some recontouring, a MOE stock, and the right handguard selection you could strip some serious weight off. I don't think that it will ever be a lightweight hunting rifle, but it could easily be more manageable for that role. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So is it safe to say that this rifle is a "tartered up" bolt gun, or scout gun? It's a tarted up bolt gun designed for accuracy, precision, and long range. It's too heavy to be a scout gun unless you're Paul Bunyan strong. Although I guess you could for for a shorter, lightweight barrel, lightweight rail and lightweight stock. Or you could go for heavy, stable components for a target rifle. That, to my mind, is the big advantage to this rifle. I'm thinking with a 16" bbl and some recontouring, a MOE stock, and the right handguard selection you could strip some serious weight off. I don't think that it will ever be a lightweight hunting rifle, but it could easily be more manageable for that role. That is my plan for a handy 16" lightweight 308 rpr, I also want the 6.5 in a 22". I don't shoot much unsuppressed anymore and I read the 6.5 suppressed w 22" barrel is equivalent to the 24" for muzzle velocity. |
|
Threads like these make me really want one in 6.5.
IF the aftermarket catches on a little bit for the Ruger American, I'd get one of those in 6.5 too to make it worth the investment in the caliber. That's a lot of gun or $1050. I've been a critic of Ruger in the past, but they really seem to be listening to the consumer more than most other brands at the moment. |
|
Quoted:
Glad to see some one give a review As much as I like .243 I'm really interested in the 6.5cm one. Have you taken it apart yet?, what's the barrel on it, like a ar10 one without the gashole? How's the trigger feel? View Quote Yeah I'm really interested in this gun and will probably pickup one in 6.5CM. |
|
Quoted:
I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks for the review! Congrats on the rifle! Question: did you do a barrel break-in or just shot the groups out of the box? I have worked as a statistician for years. There is no proof for or against "breaking in" a barrel. I'd rather just start shooting for groups than burning up the barrel for break in. Plus, cleaning agents and rods have ruined way more barrels than bullets. If it shoots in, that's great, but I'm very pleased with both as is. I hope Savage and Remington have their R&D guys hard at work. I never saw myself with a Ruger CF rifle. I am a big fan now. I've never cared for Ruger rifles outside of the 10/22 always preferred Savage and Remington but I plan on buying one of these. Can't wait to see aftermarket barrel for sale. |
|
Quoted:
Is the magazine well part of the chassis aluminum or plastic? How solid is the buttstock end of the rifle? Do all the parts clamp tight so there is no wiggle? View Quote The well is aluminum. The buttstock is solid with no wiggle. That's an achievement given all the potential for adjustment. |
|
Thanks for the real world review.
I want one badly. But first, to start a savings jar. |
|
Quoted:
I don't think they are. Shooting lefty with a normal rifle is easy. It's what I do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone know if they plan to offer these with a left-handed action? I don't think they are. Shooting lefty with a normal rifle is easy. It's what I do. Every other minority is pandered to these days, why not lefties? |
|
Getting one in .308 as soon as I can get to my ffl to order me one...will paint in fde and mounting a U.S. Optics st10 on it. I'm excited!
|
|
|
Quoted:
Anyone know if they plan to offer these with a left-handed action? View Quote I contacted Ruger customer service the day they were announced for sale, and they said absolutely not, there are no plans to develop a left-handed model. Now I have to decide whether I want to gimp myself with a righty model or pursue other options at higher cost |
|
Quoted:
I contacted Ruger customer service the day they were announced for sale, and they said absolutely not, there are no plans to develop a left-handed model. Now I have to decide whether I want to gimp myself with a righty model or pursue other options at higher cost View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone know if they plan to offer these with a left-handed action? I contacted Ruger customer service the day they were announced for sale, and they said absolutely not, there are no plans to develop a left-handed model. Now I have to decide whether I want to gimp myself with a righty model or pursue other options at higher cost Shooting rifle cross-handed isn't bad with a blinder and rest. After an injury, I had to switch hands for pistol. That's way tougher than a rifle change. A well placed Butler flip up makes a great blinder. |
|
Bought a PA-10 lower from PSA back in December to do a .308 build, contemplating doing this instead.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.