Quoted: So I seem to recall experts in the Revolutionary war could fire 2 shots in about a minute or something like that.
|
Those would be flintlock rifles firing a patched ball. I'm not talking about how people do it nowadays for hunting or buckskinning, but how it was done back then, loading from a powder horn and measure, or from blank cartridge, and then loading ball/patch, once the powder was down the barrel and in the pan.
My question is how safe that is.
|
How safe is standing next to Dick Cheney?
Seriously, if done in a military fashion, loading smoothbore muskets with ball cartridge and priming from the paper cartridge, one can load and fire safely three to five shots per minute if the soldier was well-trained, the gun in good-working order, and the powder, flint and weather in optimum condition. Notice I said, "well-trained". It gets to be a rote exercise, repeated, until it functions like clockwork.
As for safety, it's relative. If you do it as the did it back then with all the conditions above, you had more to fear from the enemy, than from your own gun or from your fellow musketman.
I know when it comes to cannons you have to swab the bore with a wet rag to extinguish any burning embers before you reload. I also know a guy in Iowa recently lost most of his hand during a High School football game when he forgot (or was never taught) that crucial step. He wasn't firing cannon balls but lost a bunch of fingers just the same.
|
See my other post. We have to go through training on all these guns for the National Park Service as well as in reenactment, or else, no work, no play, respectively.
As for stumpy, he probably wasn't sponging out the gun nor working with a trained crew. There are a lot of Darwin Awards candidates out there.
So if you rapid reload a muzzle loader (like a flintlock) couldn't it pose the exact same risk?
I'm thinking about getting a Kentucky rifle and need to look into this stuff. I don't wanna fire a ramrod 100 yards and don't wanna lose any fingers.
|
Nobody generally reloaded a Pennsylvania rifle that quickly- they weren't used as saturation fire muskets. They were used as sniper weapons when practical. (Kentucky rifles are a 19th century item, BTW) But if you had to reload a musket that quickly, and had the enemy all around, I think safety was the last thing on your mind, much as in firefights today.
The American Revolution was NOT won by individuals with rifles; it was won by the USA eventually beating the British at their own game: massed, well-trained troops firing smoothbore muskets in precision volleys, three to five times a minute.
ETA: and they didn't just stand there and blast away at the enemy- three to five volleys, fix bayonets, if not fixed already, then charge, once the artillery and light infantry (skirmishers) had done their work along with the musketmen. By 1784, when Washington disbanded most of the army, the Continental Army was the best battlefield army in the world, despite its recruitment problems- Washington never had enough troops!