Quoted: Watch out! Such a transfer would be a violation of Federal law without the handgun going through a dealer on your end. I know you would like to help out your friend, but it might be better if he found someone at his location to hold the gun or to sell it outright..
|
Does it depend on whether a transfer of ownership is taking place?
I agree with you, that an FFL transfer is required if
BillLumberg is being given the guns, so that they won't be covered in the divorce (or some clever thing like that), even if he intends to give them back someday.
But if his buddy is just storing the guns at his house, or is planning to perhaps move out there, can his friend not ship them to himself, c/o
BillLumberg - with the understanding that they would still be his property, and covered by any division of assets in the divorce. (I'm sorta thinking of the fact that you can ship guns to yourself, at an out-of-state address, if you are going there - say for a hunting vacation or something like that).
So perhaps the answer in part may depend on whether or not his buddy wants to jsut remove the guns from his house, or whether he wants someone else (out of state) to own them - either temporarily or permanently. In the latter case, an FFL transfer is definitely required.
Not saying I know the answer - jsut wondering if there is a requirement for a transfer of ownership (either official or implied) before the FFL is necessary.