

|
Was the cop holding a captive bolt gun and an O2 tank when he asked you to step out of the car?
|
|
I actually know a guy who had a cop plant drugs on him. Luckily, another cop's body cam caught it and he ended up with a nice settlement and an apology from the Captain.
|
|
Quoted: I don't know I wasn't there. But if I'm asking someone out I'm only asking to be courteous followed by ordering followed by forcing. I don't know, most likely to compare stories about travel and stop locations between you and the passenger. Ok you are free to do that. Only need RAS for a stop. But even 1 mph over or literally any other witnessed violation would be PC and pretext stops are a thing. No you don't need to get stopped immediately. You may let a vehicle travel for possibly miles watching for driving conduct after the first indicator or offense. Yes, he was probably looking for a large amount of drugs or cash. I have a feeling I could spend an hour explaining case law and interdiction tactics and no response would satisfy you. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So is there no asking vs ordering for this? Either way it leads to more questions then as first, what was he looking to achieve by getting me out of the car for a traffic stop that he couldn't even explain what it was actually for? Had I gotten out I would have closed the door behind me, told my wife to lock it and I would never have consented to a search of myself nor the car and would not have agreed to anything. He obviously had zero probable cause for anything. His traffic violation claim was lame as fuck to start with. I know that he is not allowed to extend the stop to get help or a dog past the reasonable time to write a ticket for his made up traffic violation. So what did winning for him look like at that point? Was he upset that I didn't roll out of the car screaming that I had 500kg of cocaine in the trunk? I don't know I wasn't there. But if I'm asking someone out I'm only asking to be courteous followed by ordering followed by forcing. I don't know, most likely to compare stories about travel and stop locations between you and the passenger. Ok you are free to do that. Only need RAS for a stop. But even 1 mph over or literally any other witnessed violation would be PC and pretext stops are a thing. No you don't need to get stopped immediately. You may let a vehicle travel for possibly miles watching for driving conduct after the first indicator or offense. Yes, he was probably looking for a large amount of drugs or cash. I have a feeling I could spend an hour explaining case law and interdiction tactics and no response would satisfy you. Welp. We found the cop. And also a great example of how our police lost my support. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, but define ‘order’. Plenty of weasels in the world will intentionally blur the line between a question and a command hoping to convince you to put up with BS. View Quote I don’t really see the point of blurring the line on that one. The only reason to do so is to try to get someone to do something you can’t make them do, but in this case they can absolutely be made to do it. |
|
Quoted: The only thing we could think of is that he was on some fishing expedition using some shit he had gotten away with in the past and realized we weren't morons? View Quote i'm going with this that is a strange one no doubt |
|
Quoted: Yet he's completely correct. I don't do traffic stops any more, except for training noobies, but when I invite you to exit the vehicle, as the driver, refusing is only going to end badly. You get to choose how this goes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Pretty good and informative response, right up the the final inappropriate, rather petulant remark. I don't do traffic stops any more, except for training noobies, but when I invite you to exit the vehicle, as the driver, refusing is only going to end badly. You get to choose how this goes. Found another one. Please don’t complain about how cops are treated and lack of support. You damn well why you guys lost it. |
|
Quoted: The only thing we could think of is that he was on some fishing expedition using some shit he had gotten away with in the past and realized we weren't morons? View Quote That's 100% what was going on. |
|
"Is there anything in the car I should be aware of?"
"Just a dead hooker and two kilos of uncut Columbian...why do you ask?" |
|
If you are surprised by any of the stop then you have not been paying attention to modern-day policing.
The stop was conducted the same way as thousands of other interstate/drug corridors fishing expeditions. The official stuck to standard procedures nothing to see, STFU and move along citizens. ![]() |
|
Isn't Utah the state where highway cops love to use the civil asset forfeiture excuse to straight-up rob people? Though they usually hit out of staters with that. You got $50k on you.....and a VAPE PEN!!! Must be a drug smuggler! We're confiscating all this ill-gotten drug money, and if you complain, you're gettin' arrested.
OP almost got robbed. |
|
Driving while white is always dangerous, sometimes deadly. Systemic racism.
|
|
|
I had one pretty similar
I was in a all black Malibu with some pretty dark windows.. The unmarked county deputy said I was following too close to the tractor trailer in front of me. Pure fishing expedition Red |
|
Sounds like some Super Troopers shit.
Are you sure he didn't say "Sir I need you to step out of the vehicle meow"? |
|
When a cop asks, "Do you mind if search your car?", never give a yes or no answer. If you don't consent say "I will not give you permission to search my vehicle", or something like that. If you give a "no" answer to the question, they will say you are saying you don't mind if your vehicle gets searched. If you give a "yes" answer they will say that were giving them permission to search the car. That used to be a thing, I really don't know if it still is or not.
|
|
Quoted: When a cop asks, "Do you mind if search your car?", never give a yes or no answer. If you don't consent say "I will not give you permission to search my vehicle", or something like that. If you give a "no" answer to the question, they will say you are saying you don't mind if your vehicle gets searched. If you give a "yes" answer they will say that were giving them permission to search the car. That used to be a thing, I really don't know if it still is or not. View Quote You can always withdraw consent if the police officer believes it was given. "Sorry officer...let me clarify..." |
|
Someone replied with a link to a "cheap" 4k dash cam... can someone post a good/better/recommended one?
|
|
|
Quoted: Welp. We found the cop. And also a great example of how our police lost my support. View Quote Yep. Ive never been pulled over or even had so much as a parking ticket. I have a family member thats a state trooper. Dated a girl and her brother was a state trooper. I absolutely cannot stand cops and their attitude, they are all on some kind of power trip. "oh your gonna do what I say" Only real interaction ive had with a cop was a fender bender where I was rear ended at a stop light off a small 2 lane road. Cop: did you already exchange insurance information? Me: yea she texted it to me and I have my insurance in my hand as well. cop: ok, well you both can go ahead and leave then. Me: can I still get a police report for my insurance just in case? The cop tried everything he could to get out of doing a police report. But I wanted one. Then he told me to stand over on the side of the road (this was in december) while he sat in his car doing the police report. 20 minutes later he came out of the car and said it would be ready in 3-5 days. The part that turned me away from cops even more was when my family member went through the academy and was telling me some of what they were trained to do. Then I found out cops were allowed to lie to you to get you to answer their questions to provide them with whatever they want. I trust them about as much as shaquille o'neal shooting a free throw with his eyes closed. They are not your friend. |
|
Quoted: I don’t really see the point of blurring the line on that one. The only reason to do so is to try to get someone to do something you can’t make them do, but in this case they can absolutely be made to do it. View Quote The point is simple: they want you to agree to a search without a warrant. They can ask nicely or ask in a way that confuses you as to whether they’re asking or telling. Peace officers do the former; road pirates do the latter. |
|
In Oklahoma, apparently all cars pulled over on turnpikes are for "failure to adequately signal before changing lanes"
![]() |
|
Quoted: Are you sure it was a real cop? We've had several cases of fakes pulling people over in the state. View Quote Being a retired cop, that was my first thought as well. The described behavior of the officer was bizarre as shit. If what the OP said is true and the cop really is a cop then that agency needs to investigate to see what is going on with their employee. Sounded like there could be a mental health issue going on with him with that kind of behavior. |
|
|
|
Quoted: The point is simple: they want you to agree to a search without a warrant. They can ask nicely or ask in a way that confuses you as to whether they’re asking or telling. Peace officers do the former; road pirates do the latter. View Quote Go back and read the post you quoted. It isn’t in reference to a search. It’s in reference to whether or not an officer can order you out of your car on a traffic stop, which they can. |
|
|
|
Quoted: No, you said you have to move to the furthest possible lane in every instance. The law says you have to move one lane, and only if it's safe to do so. It actually doesn't say anything about slowing down either, just "proceed with caution." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: In VA you are required to go to the furthest lane away from any official or emergency vehicle that might be stopped along the road as well as slow your speed, I think. I thought this is what he meant by 'passing too close' Also I keep seeing Broderick Crawford when I think about this scenario. No, drivers are required to move over at least one lane if it is reasonably safe to do so, otherwise they must slow down. And it applies to any vehicle displaying hazard lights; cops, firetrucks, tow trucks, mini vans with the blinkers on, etc. That's exactly what I said. No, you said you have to move to the furthest possible lane in every instance. The law says you have to move one lane, and only if it's safe to do so. It actually doesn't say anything about slowing down either, just "proceed with caution." apex didn't mention that the lights need to be on, you clarified that. IDK about other states but in Bama, if you can't safely move over to the next lane, you have to slow down 10 or 15 miles below the posted speed limit. |
|
Quoted: So this was another weird spot of it from what my friend said. Did the cop say 'can you step out of the car please' or 'step out of the car please' One is a command and you are required to get out due to 'reasons'. The other is a question just like 'is it ok if I search your vehicle' that you can refuse. I don't remember if he said 'can you' or basically said get out. All I know is when I told him no thanks, he just stood there like a weirdo for 20 seconds looking at me like he was waiting for the next page of Policing 101 to load. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He could have arrested you for not getting out. He sounds like a real weirdo. So this was another weird spot of it from what my friend said. Did the cop say 'can you step out of the car please' or 'step out of the car please' One is a command and you are required to get out due to 'reasons'. The other is a question just like 'is it ok if I search your vehicle' that you can refuse. I don't remember if he said 'can you' or basically said get out. All I know is when I told him no thanks, he just stood there like a weirdo for 20 seconds looking at me like he was waiting for the next page of Policing 101 to load. You encountered a T1000, it was just looking for Sarah Connor, that's why it let you go |
|
Quoted: For years I worked a job that required me to be driving to work at the exact early morning time as drunks were on the road. Stopped many times for speeding, and I usually was, maybe 5MPH or so. Never drunk /impaired. Since I wanted to minimize the stops, I stopped speeding, and developed a "procedure" to allay cop suspicions/anxiety. Still got stopped, though the frequency decreased. I think out of 30+ stops I got one written "warning", never a ticket. Once the night cops knew I was just a "working stiff" and came to recognize my car, problems decreased until a new cop was assigned the same shift, and the situation began all over again. Rinse and repeat. I'm guessing they were looking for "high value" targets (drunks) and once they realized I wasn't drunk, any further time spent on me was a waste of their time and decreased their opportunity of finding an [i]actual[//i] drunk. View Quote Lived a similar situation in the late 1990s. During one pull over event the cop looked at my boots and noted that i had Bates boots and asked if I was a cop/EMT/FF/etc. I said no, but liked the boots. During this interaction at a nearby stoplight, someone was probably looking at us and not the light. This car stopped in the middle of the intersection (better late than never I guess). There was no one else on the road and this cop looked at me, handed me my license back, and said he had found who he was looking for (LOL). About two months later I quit working that timeframe and was never bothered again. |
|
|
Quoted: It's better to be clear the first time, that way there can be no argument. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You can always withdraw consent if the police officer believes it was given. "Sorry officer...let me clarify..." It's better to be clear the first time, that way there can be no argument. Not disagreeing at all...just reminding folks that, even when mistakenly given, consent to search can be withdrawn. Much like your right to remain silent. If you start blabbing and then decide to clam up, that's your right as well. |
|
You definitely need a dash cam that records forward and back. I purchased a REXING V3 about 3 years ago. I'm sure there are probably better ones out there now.
We have dash cams on all our vehicles (3). |
|
|
I had a similar weird experience in Utah.
Got pulled over going 77 in a 75 zone, on a bright sunny day. My wife and I were both confused as hell. Apparently the cop was too. He asked for the license and registration, then just stood there staring at me for about 30 seconds, while I bit my tongue trying to prevent myself from cracking some wise-ass remark. Finally says "You know why I pulled you over, right?" Me: "??? No idea" (another 20 second pause) Cop: "Well, I think you know" Me: (wondering if he's confused me with somebody else) "No, really I don't". We went back and forth like that another 2 or 3 times. Finally he handed me my shit back and told me to "drive safe" and stomped back to his car. Best I can figure, he saw my MT plates and was fishing for drug runners or something - only he wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed, because he pulled over a minivan with little kids in it. I've heard plenty of similar stories about UT cops (I have a lot of family there). Must be something in the shitty irradiated water they drink..... |
|
|
Quoted: apex didn't mention that the lights need to be on, you clarified that. IDK about other states but in Bama, if you can't safely move over to the next lane, you have to slow down 10 or 15 miles below the posted speed limit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: In VA you are required to go to the furthest lane away from any official or emergency vehicle that might be stopped along the road as well as slow your speed, I think. I thought this is what he meant by 'passing too close' Also I keep seeing Broderick Crawford when I think about this scenario. No, drivers are required to move over at least one lane if it is reasonably safe to do so, otherwise they must slow down. And it applies to any vehicle displaying hazard lights; cops, firetrucks, tow trucks, mini vans with the blinkers on, etc. That's exactly what I said. No, you said you have to move to the furthest possible lane in every instance. The law says you have to move one lane, and only if it's safe to do so. It actually doesn't say anything about slowing down either, just "proceed with caution." apex didn't mention that the lights need to be on, you clarified that. IDK about other states but in Bama, if you can't safely move over to the next lane, you have to slow down 10 or 15 miles below the posted speed limit. To LoBrau, what's with the nit picking? You make a lot of unfounded assumptions to support your comment. If I see an emergency vehicle parked along side the road I am going to move to the farthest lane away from said vehicle and slow my speed. Do I need to clarify any move would be made only if safe? Really? Did I say 'every instance"? You do what you want. I've explained what I will do - the goal being to avoid any interaction with the man.. § 46.2-861.1. Drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary vehicles displaying certain warning lights on highways; penalties. A. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating blue, red, or amber light or lights as provided in § 46.2-1022, 46.2-1023, or 46.2-1024 or subsection B of § 46.2-1026 shall (i) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (ii) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection is reckless driving. B. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that (i) is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating amber light or lights as provided in subdivision A 1 or 2 of § 46.2-1025, (ii) has activated the vehicular hazard warning signal flashers, (iii) is displaying caution signs, or (iv) is marked with properly lit flares or torches shall (a) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (b) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as a traffic infraction. |
|
Quoted: I had a similar weird experience in Utah. Got pulled over going 77 in a 75 zone, on a bright sunny day. My wife and I were both confused as hell. Apparently the cop was too. He asked for the license and registration, then just stood there staring at me for about 30 seconds, while I bit my tongue trying to prevent myself from cracking some wise-ass remark. Finally says "You know why I pulled you over, right?" Me: "??? No idea" (another 20 second pause) Cop: "Well, I think you know" Me: (wondering if he's confused me with somebody else) "No, really I don't". We went back and forth like that another 2 or 3 times. Finally he handed me my shit back and told me to "drive safe" and stomped back to his car. Best I can figure, he saw my MT plates and was fishing for drug runners or something - only he wasn't the sharpest tool in the shed, because he pulled over a minivan with little kids in it. I've heard plenty of similar stories about UT cops (I have a lot of family there). Must be something in the shitty irradiated water they drink..... View Quote When a cop asks you "Do you know why I pulled you over?", the always-correct and truthful answer is "No, I don't Officer.". You have NO idea at that point exactly why he pulled you over; you don't know what is in his mind. This is an extremely common ploy to get the driver to make an admission of guilt which can be (and will be) used against the driver in Court. |
|
Quoted: To LoBrau, what's with the nit picking? You make a lot of unfounded assumptions to support your comment. If I see an emergency vehicle parked along side the road I am going to move to the farthest lane away from said vehicle and slow my speed. Do I need to clarify any move would be made only if safe? Really? Did I say 'every instance"? You do what you want. I've explained what I will do., § 46.2-861.1. Drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary vehicles displaying certain warning lights on highways; penalties. A. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating blue, red, or amber light or lights as provided in § 46.2-1022, 46.2-1023, or 46.2-1024 or subsection B of § 46.2-1026 shall (i) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (ii) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection is reckless driving. B. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that (i) is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating amber light or lights as provided in subdivision A 1 or 2 of § 46.2-1025, (ii) has activated the vehicular hazard warning signal flashers, (iii) is displaying caution signs, or (iv) is marked with properly lit flares or torches shall (a) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (b) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as a traffic infraction. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: In VA you are required to go to the furthest lane away from any official or emergency vehicle that might be stopped along the road as well as slow your speed, I think. I thought this is what he meant by 'passing too close' Also I keep seeing Broderick Crawford when I think about this scenario. No, drivers are required to move over at least one lane if it is reasonably safe to do so, otherwise they must slow down. And it applies to any vehicle displaying hazard lights; cops, firetrucks, tow trucks, mini vans with the blinkers on, etc. That's exactly what I said. No, you said you have to move to the furthest possible lane in every instance. The law says you have to move one lane, and only if it's safe to do so. It actually doesn't say anything about slowing down either, just "proceed with caution." apex didn't mention that the lights need to be on, you clarified that. IDK about other states but in Bama, if you can't safely move over to the next lane, you have to slow down 10 or 15 miles below the posted speed limit. To LoBrau, what's with the nit picking? You make a lot of unfounded assumptions to support your comment. If I see an emergency vehicle parked along side the road I am going to move to the farthest lane away from said vehicle and slow my speed. Do I need to clarify any move would be made only if safe? Really? Did I say 'every instance"? You do what you want. I've explained what I will do., § 46.2-861.1. Drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary vehicles displaying certain warning lights on highways; penalties. A. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating blue, red, or amber light or lights as provided in § 46.2-1022, 46.2-1023, or 46.2-1024 or subsection B of § 46.2-1026 shall (i) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (ii) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection is reckless driving. B. The driver of any motor vehicle, upon approaching a stationary vehicle that (i) is displaying a flashing, blinking, or alternating amber light or lights as provided in subdivision A 1 or 2 of § 46.2-1025, (ii) has activated the vehicular hazard warning signal flashers, (iii) is displaying caution signs, or (iv) is marked with properly lit flares or torches shall (a) on a highway having at least four lanes, at least two of which are intended for traffic proceeding as the approaching vehicle, proceed with caution and, if reasonable, with due regard for safety and traffic conditions, yield the right-of-way by making a lane change into a lane not adjacent to the stationary vehicle or (b) if changing lanes would be unreasonable or unsafe, proceed with due caution and maintain a safe speed for highway conditions. A violation of any provision of this subsection shall be punishable as a traffic infraction. Sorry, I'm in a crabby mood and felt like arguing I guess. |
|
|
Quoted: Are you sure it was a real cop? We've had several cases of fakes pulling people over in the state. View Quote I would never stop on the highway at night for a cop, and taught my daughters the same. I told them to call 911 and keep driving until they are advised s/he is valid. Too much bad out there these days. |
|
My mom pulled off an interstate late one night and was being aggressively followed. It scared her enough to call the cops. Dispatch put her on hold, the car behind her turned away, then dispatch came back and said it was just a cop car, don't worry about it.
She didn't understand. I told her he was trying to make her make a mistake so he could pull her over. She drives an escalade, so I assumed she was profiled. It was also late, she was coming back from a family get together. Someone here will probably try to defend that piece of shit. |
|
|
|
Quoted: So this was another weird spot of it from what my friend said. Did the cop say 'can you step out of the car please' or 'step out of the car please' One is a command and you are required to get out due to 'reasons'. The other is a question just like 'is it ok if I search your vehicle' that you can refuse. I don't remember if he said 'can you' or basically said get out. All I know is when I told him no thanks, he just stood there like a weirdo for 20 seconds looking at me like he was waiting for the next page of Policing 101 to load. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: He could have arrested you for not getting out. He sounds like a real weirdo. So this was another weird spot of it from what my friend said. Did the cop say 'can you step out of the car please' or 'step out of the car please' One is a command and you are required to get out due to 'reasons'. The other is a question just like 'is it ok if I search your vehicle' that you can refuse. I don't remember if he said 'can you' or basically said get out. All I know is when I told him no thanks, he just stood there like a weirdo for 20 seconds looking at me like he was waiting for the next page of Policing 101 to load. Similarly, I had a coworker lose a dope case becuase of a failure in wording like that. He asked "mind if I take a look in your car" vs "do you consent to me searching your vehicle" Judge tossed the evidence because "looking in" is different than searching and it lost a pretty good felony case |
|
Quoted: I swear to God, all this talk about dash cameras. Someone oughta make a dash cam that records the interior of the car and window areas with a mouse-fart microphone right at the drivers window and an instant cloud upload that can't be fucky-fucked with and a monitor on the outside of the driver's door window so the officer is well aware the entire encounter is being uploaded and will continually be recorded if the vehicle is impounded "Can I search your car? Why, did you lose something I wouldn't know anything about?" View Quote They can be pricey, but a camera system that has both forward and rear cameras, I think the Garmin has one with 3 channels, LTE, "Garmin Vault" storage. Once the cop pulls up, if they don't announce their name, you can say" hello Officer (name), if the stop continues in an unsettling manner, you can chime in with "this camera is recording with cloud storage" We do need a thread on this. A good camera that can see plates, especially at night, with multi-channel, and cloud storage would be worth it. |
|
Quoted: Go back and read the post you quoted. It isn’t in reference to a search. It’s in reference to whether or not an officer can order you out of your car on a traffic stop, which they can. View Quote ......which is the step before the unlawful search. They're not getting you out because they want you to have a better fighting stance. It's because they want you out of the way. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.