Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 2/18/2012 12:54:22 PM EDT
Testing of the electro-magnetic catapult slated to replace the steam version on carriers:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/see-this-electromagnetic-catapult-shoot-an-f-35c-joint-strike-fighter-plane-into-the-sky/
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:24:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Yeah I heard about that several years ago.  I had no idea that they were that close.  Its amazingly quitter than the steam catapults.  But CVN Ford ummm.  Kinda a week name IMHO
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:27:08 PM EDT
[#2]
That was fantastic, thanks for the video.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:27:55 PM EDT
[#3]



Quoted:


Yeah I heard about that several years ago.  I had no idea that they were that close.  Its amazingly quitter than the steam catapults.  But CVN Ford ummm.  Kinda a week name IMHO


the magnetic cat was supposed to be on the GHWB but they had some problems with it and delayed it to the Ford class IIRC



 
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:28:34 PM EDT
[#4]
Does/Did the F35 have a tailhook problem?
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:30:55 PM EDT
[#5]

That's fuckin cool.

Thanks for posting.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:31:03 PM EDT
[#6]


Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:33:47 PM EDT
[#7]
Meh, boring. It doesn't have the same aesthetics w/o the steam leaking all over.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:37:22 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Yeah I heard about that several years ago.  I had no idea that they were that close.  Its amazingly quitter than the steam catapults.  But CVN Ford ummm.  Kinda a week name IMHO


It gives up more easily?

I bet you meant 'quicker', right?
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:40:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Magnets, how do they wrok
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:42:33 PM EDT
[#10]
America! Fuck Yeah!!
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:51:35 PM EDT
[#11]
I'd bet this is a lot easier to control than steam, too.

In theory, they can instantaneously vary the the amount of "pull" being exerted, as the plane is moving down the ramp - Faster acceleration, and less stress on the pilot and airframe.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:51:53 PM EDT
[#12]
That was really cool!
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:53:40 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah I heard about that several years ago.  I had no idea that they were that close.  Its amazingly quitter than the steam catapults.  But CVN Ford ummm.  Kinda a week name IMHO


It gives up more easily?

I bet you meant 'quicker', right?


My money would be on "quieter."
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 3:56:10 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
Meh, boring. It doesn't have the same aesthetics w/o the steam leaking all over.


Yes, like all the crap from horse drawn carriages, those were aesthetically pleasing too.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 4:09:24 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Does/Did the F35 have a tailhook problem?


It did, but I think it's already been corrected.
Link Posted: 2/18/2012 5:43:13 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yeah I heard about that several years ago.  I had no idea that they were that close.  Its amazingly quitter than the steam catapults.  But CVN Ford ummm.  Kinda a week name IMHO


It gives up more easily?

I bet you meant 'quicker', right?


Or quieter.

I don't think it is supposed to be quicker.

It can be adjusted to the weight of the aircraft and give a more controlled acceleration than the steam catapults could, IIRC.

Link Posted: 2/18/2012 6:20:41 PM EDT
[#17]
not a railgun OP, a coilgun, maybe.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top