User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:29:49 AM EDT
[#1]
Just so ya know when alot of people are linking to polls from the same site or have the same cookies it usually blocks your vote.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:30:49 AM EDT
[#2]
no 72.9%
yes 27% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:44:07 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted: Just so ya know when alot of people are linking to polls from the same site or have the same cookies it usually blocks your vote. Just so ya know... I don't care. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:44:08 AM EDT
[#4]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
28.3% Yes 71.6% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:51:46 AM EDT
[#5]
Delete cookies and vote all you want
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:55:30 AM EDT
[#6]
Yes: 44.7% No: 55.2% Keep hitting it people, we don't need to loose another one! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:56:15 AM EDT
[#7]
Yes 47.4%
No 52.5% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:58:02 AM EDT
[#8]
Well ive voted a few hundred times now moved it past 50 50
ill keep moving it but im hungry and want some del taco soon |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:58:32 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted: Just so ya know when alot of people are linking to polls from the same site or have the same cookies it usually blocks your vote. Don't confuse cookies, which are an identifier for a session and unique, and HTTP referrers, which will show where the url was linked from. BTW: [B]Does the Assault Weapons Ban violate gun owner rights? Yes: 47.4% No: 52.5%[/B] Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 10:59:04 AM EDT
[#10]
Yes 50.6
No 49.3 I will say that the delete of the cookies is not something I wish to partake in, I honestly want to know how the poles turn out...Otherwise I have to agree w/ JAFO "I dont care" [:D] |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:05:58 AM EDT
[#11]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
Yes 59.4% No 40.5% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:06:13 AM EDT
[#12]
Yes 57.6%
No 42.3% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:06:22 AM EDT
[#13]
Well, fixing polls doesn't really change public opinion. If you think we are winning because a bunch of gun nutz go "hit a poll," well, then I'm not sure I could explain it to ya ;)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:06:47 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted: Yes 50.6 No 49.3 I will say that the delete of the cookies is not something I wish to partake in, I honestly want to know how the poles turn out...Otherwise I have to agree w/ JAFO "I dont care" [:D] Yeah, I agree. I just went ahead and voted a few times for friends and family. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:07:51 AM EDT
[#15]
done
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:08:11 AM EDT
[#16]
Even though I vote in these polls all the time, I can't help but think it's self defeating.
Sure, we can tip the scales but, then it makes it more difficult for us to determine exactly what and how many we're up aginst... I like to know who my enemies are. Besides, the results will change no ones mind, the poll takers know when the box is being stuffed and if it's favorable to us it'll get buried anyways. So now it's up to %61.8 yes, %38.1 no. (the damage is done anyways, so why the Hell not [:)]) |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:09:56 AM EDT
[#17]
Quoted: Well ive voted a few hundred times now moved it past 50 50 ill keep moving it but im hungry and want some del taco soon If you channeled that time and energy into writing political representatives, perhaps you could make a *real* difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:09:58 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted: Well ive voted a few hundred times now moved it past 50 50 ill keep moving it but im hungry and want some del taco soon Please don't do that. They can tell when you do that and may remove the poll because of it. Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:11:19 AM EDT
[#19]
It is now
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights? 61.5% Yes 38.4% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:14:48 AM EDT
[#20]
Why don't you take a math class.[flame] One of the 1st things they will teach you in stat is quality of your sample. Since it was not random and only includes people online who look at a particular webpage it will never be a valid poll.
So they are just begging me to further skew thier numbers. Im going to Del Taco in a bit but 1st im going to run EZMacro and run this poll up to 90% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:17:02 AM EDT
[#21]
Done
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights? 61.0% Yes 38.9% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:17:32 AM EDT
[#22]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
59.8% Yes 40.1% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:26:09 AM EDT
[#23]
At least a "hammered poll" won't show up as "news" in some report. I have a theory that polls that come out in favor of gun-control tend to show up in news stories as a hard poll, which DOES do some damage regardless of how BS it is.
I think that by hammering every poll we find, it reduces the chances that such polls will be used against us. It will also leave the distinct impression (over a period of years) that gun-control is a losing issue, whether true or not. Sure, we'll never hear about a hammered poll on the nightly news, and sure it is never scientific, but there are other intangible results: 1) Less false polling data to show support for gun control. 2) Remind folks that pro-gunners are still out there, and are paying attention. 3) Help people realize that polls are often skewed. 4) Leaves the impression that the internet is 'conservative'. The liberals have TV, newsprint, and magazines, conservatives dominate radio and the internet. These polls will never be accurate, so I'd just take the intangible benefits. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 11:41:37 AM EDT
[#24]
ROUNDS COMPLETE. Hits recorded.
Requesting additional artillery at previous coordinates. HIT IT WITH EVERYTHING YOU HAVE! OUT. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 12:12:32 PM EDT
[#25]
5 rem **NEO-CON GUN CONTROL LOGIC SUBROUTINE**
10 a(1)$="democrats" 20 a(2)$="republicans" 30 x(1)$="unconstitutional and an infringement" 40 x(2)$="reasonable and common sense" 50 print "Who is enacting the assault weapon ban?" 60 print "1- democrats" 70 print "2- republicans" 80 input c 90 if c<>1 or c<>2 then goto 50 100 print "If the ";a(c)$;" enact the assault weapon ban then it is ";x(c)$ 110 goto 10 |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 12:13:43 PM EDT
[#26]
YES 73.3
NO 26.6 |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 1:07:44 PM EDT
[#27]
Quoted: At least a "hammered poll" won't show up as "news" in some report. I have a theory that polls that come out in favor of gun-control tend to show up in news stories as a hard poll, which DOES do some damage regardless of how BS it is. I think that by hammering every poll we find, it reduces the chances that such polls will be used against us. It will also leave the distinct impression (over a period of years) that gun-control is a losing issue, whether true or not. Sure, we'll never hear about a hammered poll on the nightly news, and sure it is never scientific, but there are other intangible results: 1) Less false polling data to show support for gun control. 2) Remind folks that pro-gunners are still out there, and are paying attention. 3) Help people realize that polls are often skewed. 4) Leaves the impression that the internet is 'conservative'. The liberals have TV, newsprint, and magazines, conservatives dominate radio and the internet. These polls will never be accurate, so I'd just take the intangible benefits. I didn't say I was against "hammering" polls. Just so the "hammer" doesn't think he's done a lot for the "cause" it's all good :) We are a minority. We have a lot of work to do. Not just anti-gun people are anti-black rifle. Have fun with the polls, but stay focused on the task at hand. Write to your reps. Introduce non-gun owners to shooting. Introduce non-black rifle owners to black rifles. There is a lot we can do that is much more effective than "hammering" polls. :) |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 1:15:53 PM EDT
[#28]
Another vote for freedom, which also makes me believe that they will probably disregard the findings of this poll. It doesn't suit "their" version of the facts.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 1:48:12 PM EDT
[#29]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
Yes 66.5% No 33.4% |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 1:50:10 PM EDT
[#30]
Agree totally, JAFO!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 1:51:53 PM EDT
[#31]
Yes 66.1
No 33.8 |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 2:02:41 PM EDT
[#32]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
65.7% Yes 34.2% No Fire for effect! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 2:28:20 PM EDT
[#33]
64.3% Yes
35.6% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 2:30:02 PM EDT
[#34]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
64.2% Yes 35.7% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 2:42:16 PM EDT
[#35]
Yes 63%...cmon and hit it guys!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2003 5:41:27 PM EDT
[#36]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
60.5% Yes 39.4% No |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2003 12:24:35 AM EDT
[#37]
Does the assault weapons ban violate gun owner rights?
61.5% Yes 38.4% No Gained a little ground back. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
