BATF does not have to "approve" anything. BATF is not in the business of clarifying, it is in the business of finding violations.
The law says collapsible stocks are what defines a bad gun. If the stock no longer collapses, then it is not, by definition, a collapsible stock. Liberal application of JB Weld will make a CAR stock not moveable.
Now putting aside the question of whether the BATF has a secret solvent that will remove JB Weld (or any epoxy compound) without destroying the plastic stock, all these things come down to intent according to a reasonable person. While you may argue that a BATF agent is not reasonable, a jury will be.
After all, a "permanently fixed" muzzle brake is not really permanent if it was once threaded. However, even the BATF has acknowledged that it is reasonable to assume with a pin and high-temp solder the intent is to make it "permanent". The usual definition of these things assumes that it cannot be adjusted without the use of tools. Apply the same thinking to a CAR stock, and you will see why many of us have used epoxy with confidence. Besides, after all these years, how many people have been prosecuted for having a JB Welded CAR stock? A big fat zero. Because if there was a court ruling on it, we would have all the guidance we need.
Madkiwi