User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 1:50:07 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I remember reading somewhere that CVNs could push well over 40kts, enough to outrun Akulas that might hunt them. No idea if it's actually true, but wouldn't surprise me too much  I do know the lowly USS Forrestal could put distance on a Soviet Kresta Cruiser with a shaft locked due to a bearing casualty. Sure made the ship shake though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 2:12:47 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: -0.07 in a Cub. Slow flight into a headwind = negative ground speed.  You "win" 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 5:47:39 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I remember reading somewhere that CVNs could push well over 40kts, enough to outrun Akulas that might hunt them. No idea if it's actually true, but wouldn't surprise me too much Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: My brother is retired from the Navy and last year when we were out on his sail boat, he said pretty much every performance number on a ship or aircraft is complete BS. Still wouldn't tell me the goods on a few ships and jets I asked about. Did tell me that if he told me what a carrier could do in calm seas vs what is reported, I wouldn't believe him. Not one, but two huge nuclear reactors on tap? I bet it's hella fast. I remember reading somewhere that CVNs could push well over 40kts, enough to outrun Akulas that might hunt them. No idea if it's actually true, but wouldn't surprise me too much 48 to 55 depending on boat and sea state is my estimate |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 5:49:31 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: .845 in the L-1011. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 6:48:07 AM EDT
[#5]
2 min of fuel left?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:08:34 AM EDT
[#6]
My F-150 with its tuned 3.5L Twin Turbo can do that easily.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:16:24 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1.39 in a F-18D here  1.2 in the backseat. Hardly knew it happened. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:19:58 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: An F-16 can't do this. Sorry. The rest of the story It was a clean jet doing an FCF. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:34:02 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 0.202 in the O-2A My old man was a AF FAC in those before moving to the A7D. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:46:33 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 2 min of fuel left? Yeah this was the part of the story that didn't ring true for me. No fighter pilot is intentionally going to get to such a low fuel state AND keep the aircraft in afterburner. That's total theatrical BS but if true the guy should have his wings ripped off. I got to Mach 2 in an RF-4C (slick configuration) over the Pacific in 1987. I actually did it several times. The first time we climbed the jet up to 53000 feet (max for the F-4 was supposed to be 55K and we were wallowing around and couldn't push the altitude any further) and we were in full afterburner for 15 minutes before we pushed the nose over. The jet was at around 1.6 Mach when we started the dive and we pushed over to 45º nose low. We went through Mach 2 at around 29000 feet but the aircraft was shuddering petty badly and we experienced a violent jolt at one point (turned out we had ripped a piece of the underbelly paneling off the jet - my Squadron CO was not pleased). We decided to rethink our strategy because pointing the aircraft at the ground didn't seem to be the best way to do things. We rememebered that in F-4 flight training that an aircraft will max accelerate under unloaded/Zero-G conditions. Our next attempt we got to 53K altitude and when we were at 1.6M and the aircraft would not accelerate any more we gently pushed the nose over until we were at Zero-G and we were light in the seat. This resulted in max acceleration in a gentle arc instead of a suicide run for the ground! The jet broke Mach 2 aound 40K feet (no shuddering this time) and top speed on that flight according to the Mach meter was 2.2M. After that just about all the guys in my squadron made their own successful attempts at breaking Mach 2. We even had special patches made up to commemorate the feat that we wore for a while until the commander told us to stop wearing them. Good times. The F-4 was a beast! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:48:34 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 2 minutes of fuel left? Did he glide it back? At max AB At altitude and pulling back to idle he had plenty of fuel. Yes, in a way he did glide back. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:49:33 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah this was the part of the story that didn't ring true for me. No fighter pilot is intentionally going to get to such a low fuel state AND keep the aircraft in afterburner. I'm sure he's referencing being 2 mins from Bingo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:52:40 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The air blowing along the inside of an F-16 canopy comes from ... the engine. The compressor and turbine I'm talking about aren't part of the engine, but part of a refrigeration system downstream of the compressor stages of the engine. The heat sink for this refrigeration cycle is basically the full stagnation temperature of the aerodynamic flow. The canopy sees this stagnation temperature only on a very limited region at the front of the canopy. The majority of the canopy, say 80%, sees roughly 7/10ths of this aerodynamic heating. And then, you have to factor in the thermal conduction and thermal capacitance of the polycarbonate canopy, the latter being rather significant. The most common issue with a high flying aircraft is that the canopy is cold soaked at altitude in subsonic flight, and when descending into air with higher moisture content at lower altitudes, the inside of the canopy can fog or ice up because of thermal lag and insufficient canopy heating on the inside, and outside for that matter. To overcome this thermal lag/capacitance, some aircraft will have heating elements embedded in the interior of the windscreen laminate. The 16 has no heating elements. It is all done via the ECS and there are vents on the glare shield along with the manually set defog lever on the side wall it directs airflow along the inside of the canopy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 7:56:48 AM EDT
[#14]
M
E L T I N G C A N O P E I S !!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:21:57 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: F'in commies have been building jet engines for 75 g-d years and can't figure out how to use stolen tech well enough to make an engine that doesn't need rebuilding 3-4x sooner than a similar Western engine. I doubt they're 3-4x cheaper to build, too. I've heard from multiple sources including drivers here that the Mig-25 was extremely fast in real life, not just on paper. Basically two fuck off big engines with wings.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:51:51 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Solid. In before Mach and 2.5 Or BullF16. Have not seen him around for quite some time, hope he's OK. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:57:19 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1.39 in a F-18D here Is that you Dusty 52? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:57:45 AM EDT
[#18]
Indicated 145 a few times on one of these. 1972/1973. Shorts, t-shirt, sneakers. Bugs kinda hurt at 100+.
I'd be tempted to leave my wife for a woman that wore cologne that smelled like combusted Klotz.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:59:07 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Indicated 145 a few times on one of these. 1972/1973. Shorts, t-shirt, sneakers. Bugs kinda hurt at 100+. I'd be tempted to leave my wife for a woman that wore cologne that smelled like combusted Klotz. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/312702/1972_H2_jpg-2380895.JPG I couldn't get past 125 with mine, I was about 150 lbs too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 8:59:22 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Or BullF16. Have not seen him around for quite some time, hope he's OK. He’s banned, unfortunately. Good dude seemed to be having a tough time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:01:47 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1.2 in the backseat. Hardly knew it happened. Yeah it’s uneventful. It’s not like the movie The Right Stuff. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:02:11 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He’s banned, unfortunately. Good dude seemed to be having a tough time. Damn. That's unfortunate. He wore his heart on his sleeve when it came to losing his wife. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:03:31 AM EDT
[#23]
310 in a C-130, here. I wasn't flying it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:07:09 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I do know the lowly USS Forrestal could put distance on a Soviet Kresta Cruiser with a shaft locked due to a bearing casualty. Sure made the ship shake though. Enterprise would rattle your brain at top speed. Felt like it was coming apart. We had an H-60:have some sort of emergency one time where it couldn’t hover to land. I don’t know what the natural winds were but I do know the Big E had 60+ knots wind over the deck and successfully recovered the helo. No, I’m not saying she could do 60 but she was absolutely moving. I’d guess ship speed was 40+ knots. Mobile Chernobyl |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:16:06 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm sure he's referencing being 2 mins from Bingo. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Yeah this was the part of the story that didn't ring true for me. No fighter pilot is intentionally going to get to such a low fuel state AND keep the aircraft in afterburner. I'm sure he's referencing being 2 mins from Bingo. Yep. Not just that but two minutes from bingo at full afterburner. Just throttle back to have more time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:16:16 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My brother is retired from the Navy and last year when we were out on his sail boat, he said pretty much every performance number on a ship or aircraft is complete BS. Still wouldn't tell me the goods on a few ships and jets I asked about. Did tell me that if he told me what a carrier could do in calm seas vs what is reported, I wouldn't believe him. I’ve heard the same thing from a radar operator on a carrier. Vietnam era. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:19:59 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If a Mig-23 canopy is failing, it's probably because it's trying to distance itself from that repulsive, depressing, teal-green cockpit. The fucking thing is like trying to gaze through the Eiffel Tower. I'm trying to think how they could fuck that up, but I keep circling back to the work "Soviet". Fuck it I know. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:28:54 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I couldn't get past 125 with mine, I was about 150 lbs too. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Indicated 145 a few times on one of these. 1972/1973. Shorts, t-shirt, sneakers. Bugs kinda hurt at 100+. I'd be tempted to leave my wife for a woman that wore cologne that smelled like combusted Klotz. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/312702/1972_H2_jpg-2380895.JPG I couldn't get past 125 with mine, I was about 150 lbs too. I'd run West to East on the then new bypass of St. Marys OH between a couple of exits. Slightly downhill and often had a decent tailwind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:29:14 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: M E L T I N G C A N O P E I S !!! Oh shit I remember that! 0.138 In one of Franks fine piece of machinery. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:38:19 AM EDT
[#30]
Hmmmm did he take off from a treadmill?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 9:46:20 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 0.202 in the O-2A Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: 1.39 in a F-18D here 0.202 in the O-2A I managed -0.5g in a Cessna 172 and 161 knots IAS too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:08:25 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you are OK with junking the engines. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: 3+? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:12:07 AM EDT
[#33]
I was break-in speed limited to 90 mph bringing my 335i back from pickup in Ramstein. I got passed by a Smartcar.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:25:59 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: "Los Angeles Center, Aspen 20, can you give us a ground speed check?" "Tower, I'm showing us closer to two-----thousand".... @zephyr |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:34:09 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Enterprise would rattle your brain at top speed. Felt like it was coming apart. We had an H-60:have some sort of emergency one time where it couldn’t hover to land. I don’t know what the natural winds were but I do know the Big E had 60+ knots wind over the deck and successfully recovered the helo. No, I’m not saying she could do 60 but she was absolutely moving. I’d guess ship speed was 40+ knots. Mobile Chernobyl I remember. Did 72/73 cruise on the Enterprise. High speed transit to Yankee Station from Alameda some of our escorts had to stage along our course because they couldn't keep up. On the way home we went to the aid of a burning Liberian freighter. Skipper (Ernest Tissot, odd I remember that) cleared flight decks, cat walks, weather decks, sponsons and kicked that thing in the butt. It was fast. A friend I met later in life was on one of the escorts for that cruise. He told me when Big E went fast they had no hope of keeping up. It may of been BS but he said on radar he's seen Enterprise go almost as fast as it's hull number. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:36:32 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I remember. Did 72/73 cruise on the Enterprise. High speed transit to Yankee Station from Alameda some of our escorts had to stage along our course because they couldn't keep up. On the way home we went to the aid of a burning Liberian freighter. Skipper (Ernest Tissot, odd I remember that) cleared flight decks, cat walks, weather decks, sponsons and kicked that thing in the butt. It was fast. A friend I met later in life was on one of the escorts for that cruise. He told me when Big E went fast they had no hope of keeping up. It may of been BS but he said on radar he's seen Enterprise go almost as fast as it's hull number. 2003,4,6 here……. I’d love to see some pics of her if you have any. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:38:31 AM EDT
[#37]
I've been passed in a C-152 by auto traffic on the highway below.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:39:50 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryYou were in a 4G inverted dive with a Mig-28? At what range? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:41:21 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The rest of the story It was a clean jet doing an FCF. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: An F-16 can't do this. Sorry. The rest of the story It was a clean jet doing an FCF. And, from a descent starting at 50,000 feet, rather than a MAX acceleration starting at and holding 25,000 feet, and it looks like 2.0M was achieved at a more reasonable altitude of roughly 36,000 feet, which is where mission planning would take one for maximum TAS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:50:50 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The 16 has no heating elements. It is all done via the ECS and there are vents on the glare shield along with the manually set defog lever on the side wall it directs airflow along the inside of the canopy. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The air blowing along the inside of an F-16 canopy comes from ... the engine. The compressor and turbine I'm talking about aren't part of the engine, but part of a refrigeration system downstream of the compressor stages of the engine. The heat sink for this refrigeration cycle is basically the full stagnation temperature of the aerodynamic flow. The canopy sees this stagnation temperature only on a very limited region at the front of the canopy. The majority of the canopy, say 80%, sees roughly 7/10ths of this aerodynamic heating. And then, you have to factor in the thermal conduction and thermal capacitance of the polycarbonate canopy, the latter being rather significant. The most common issue with a high flying aircraft is that the canopy is cold soaked at altitude in subsonic flight, and when descending into air with higher moisture content at lower altitudes, the inside of the canopy can fog or ice up because of thermal lag and insufficient canopy heating on the inside, and outside for that matter. To overcome this thermal lag/capacitance, some aircraft will have heating elements embedded in the interior of the windscreen laminate. The 16 has no heating elements. It is all done via the ECS and there are vents on the glare shield along with the manually set defog lever on the side wall it directs airflow along the inside of the canopy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 10:55:53 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not one, but two huge nuclear reactors on tap? I bet it’s hella fast. I have a friend who was on a carrier. He claims something like 45 knots wide open, which seems crazy to me |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:01:03 AM EDT
[#42]
I didn't realize this until today, but the canopy fog/defog is actually modeled in DCS. At least, I think they are talking about a PC sim. Unless this greg12 dude really is a fighter pilot. He's definitely wrong about Willie Nelson, though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:03:29 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 1.39 in a F-18D here Was that when Aspen 20 asked for a speed check, too? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:04:30 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Was that when Aspen 20 asked for a speed check, too? I know you’re joking but it was off the coast of Key West in a warning area. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:07:09 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: .9 at 200’ is much more exciting than 1.0+ at 25k Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I bet that was a fucking awesome ride. .9 at 200’ is much more exciting than 1.0+ at 25k This! And the below SL qual over the Salton Sea is cool too at 540. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:08:39 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You were in a 4G inverted dive with a Mig-28? At what range? Quote HistoryQuoted: You were in a 4G inverted dive with a Mig-28? At what range? 2 meters? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:15:15 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 2003,4,6 here……. I’d love to see some pics of her if you have any. @FlyNavy75 I posted a couple over on the A-6 thread: A-6 Thread I'll dig through my box of old pics and see what I have that's worth scanning. All I had in those days was a crappy little 110 camera. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:15:16 AM EDT
[#48]
such drama.
I had the Eagle at 1.8 at 55,000 feet there was no drama, it just went fast like it is supposed to do, no shaking, no noises, just going fast. PSA. Bailing out at 600 knots or mach 2 isn't going to make much of a difference, your pretty much dead no matter what, same if you hit the ground, or the thing comes apart. It's a risky game, either enjoy it or get the fuck out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:20:05 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Was that when Aspen 20 asked for a speed check, too? With so many aircraft having GPS in the cockpit not as many speed checks anymore. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/12/2022 11:20:53 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I know you’re joking but it was off the coast of Key West in a warning area. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Was that when Aspen 20 asked for a speed check, too? I know you’re joking but it was off the coast of Key West in a warning area. Just for the record, I don’t doubt that you went that fast. It just reminded me, and apparently several others, of that story from Brian Schul. 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
