Quoted:
Quoted: That couldn't possibly be the idea, would it? |
So you are saying "the man" did this on purpose just to piss you off?
This is how the courts work: when you get accused of a crime you have a right to a day in court to prove your innoicence, that is what I suggested you do.
No where does it say you have a right to not have it cost you time & money. |
I’ll “debate” it.
He’s not saying “the man” did it to piss him off, he’s saying that it must either be a clerical error OR a revenue enhancement scam. Since errors happen and so do revenue enhancement scams, this might be what is happening here.
People aren’t supposed to ever have to prove their innocence. The state is supposed to prove guilt. If the state had a video tape of the car illegally parked and of DavidC actually finding the ticket then that would be proof. If they had a photo of the car illegally parked and sent the ticket through registered mail that would also be proof.
But if there is no description of the car on the ticket, no photographs, and no evidence DavidC ever even received the ticket then he shouldn’t be expected to pay anything.
Perhaps you missed the part in the Constitution about not being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. If a government accuses someone of a crime and fines them and then makes them pay for the “right” to defend themselves then the right to a fair trial isn’t much of a right, is it?