User Panel
Posted: 6/15/2011 12:02:41 AM EDT
Anyone at all still think that the Pakistanis are our allies in the war on terror? WASHINGTON –– Pakistan's intelligence service has arrested the owner of a safe house rented to the CIA to observe Usama bin Laden's compound before the U.S. raid that killed the Al Qaeda leader, as well as a "handful" of other Pakistanis, a U.S. official said late Tuesday. In Pakistan, a Western official confirmed a New York Times report that five of the Pakistani informants who fed information to the CIA before the May 2 bin Laden raid were arrested by Pakistan's top military spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, known as ISI. Bastards. |
|
If we ever want our secret squirrel agents to be able to work in that part of the world again we better put a lot of pressure on the ISI to let them go...I'm guessing we'll need a few emergency visas too since I'm sure those 5 won't want to leave immediate family behind. They probably didn't even know who they were renting to anyway, not that that makes a damn bit of difference...
|
|
Its cool Bin Laden is dead, but Pakistan is really blooming into all sorts of a fuck. I'm not one who is particularly fond of all our engagements in the Middle East, but look, uno numero is dead so can't we just stay out and forget about em? I don't really wanna hear the "If we're not there and every square inch of the globe we're in grave trouble" rhetoric. More trouble than its worth having our nosy neighbors from the Company there.
|
|
So does this mean more cia teams observing a rescue mission, if the pakis say no?
|
|
Quoted:
snip Anyone at all still think that the Pakistanis are our allies in the war on terror? They are China's. Where is that stealth tail rotor anyway? |
|
This is why "kill 'em all" is the only workable foreign policy.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip Anyone at all still think that the Pakistanis are our allies in the war on terror? They are China's. Where is that stealth tail rotor anyway? Pakistan plays all sides against the middle. They're no real friend of China. We just happen to be an easier mark for their cons, though. TR85. |
|
Quoted:
So how did they know who our secret contacts are ? wikileaks |
|
Quoted:
IS OK! WE JUST ARREST TO GIVE MEDAL! WE HAVE BIG PARADE! WE BRING FAVORITE GOAT! |
|
Quoted:
So how did they know who our secret contacts are ? For people that couldn't find Bin Laden while he was living right under the noses of their military for 5 years, they sure sorted this out quickly. Funny, huh? I guess they didn't have as much bribe money. |
|
Those informants are as good as dead if they arent already. The pakis love our money but hate our asses. Carpet bombing the entire region is the only option
|
|
Yea just saw that on Morning Joe..."On a scale of 1 to 10 being our friends they are a 3 and Iran is a 6"....WTF
but they got nukes... |
|
Quoted:
Anyone at all still think that the Pakistanis are our allies in the war on terror? WASHINGTON –– Pakistan's intelligence service has arrested the owner of a safe house rented to the CIA to observe Usama bin Laden's compound before the U.S. raid that killed the Al Qaeda leader, as well as a "handful" of other Pakistanis, a U.S. official said late Tuesday. In Pakistan, a Western official confirmed a New York Times report that five of the Pakistani informants who fed information to the CIA before the May 2 bin Laden raid were arrested by Pakistan's top military spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, known as ISI. Bastards. It's a mixed bag in Pakistan. The government is hardly united on this matter. It is telling that it is the ISI making the arrests since they are the group that predominates among those who support the Taliban, jihadists, etc. Quite often, the ISI is in conflict with the rest of the government or military. |
|
NY Times.....Front Page....
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/15/world/asia/15policy.html?_r=1&hp |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
snip Anyone at all still think that the Pakistanis are our allies in the war on terror? They are China's. Where is that stealth tail rotor anyway? Pakistan plays all sides against the middle. They're no real friend of China. We just happen to be an easier mark for their cons, though. TR85. They play all sides because they are in a pursuit of certain national interests, although not everyone in the government agrees on what the means to achieve them are or should be, but that is still first and foremost what is on the mind of most in the Pakistani government and military. Those interests relate to India. They as a whole, or agencies seperately (like the ISI) will take whatever action they believe will reduce vulnerability to India or allow them to harm or gain an advantage over India. This issue is why they in the past supported the Taliban and why some elements like the ISI still do. They see them as a vehicle to retain controul and influence in Afghanistan, thus denying that to the Indians. Now, if we made it clear we would give the Indians some sort of advantage over them and the threat seemed credible if they don't cut the shit, I bet you'd see many, even some in the ISI, do a complete 180 on this issue. There will always be some jihadist sympathizers, of course, but they would now have the government including their colleagues more actively working against them. |
|
Quoted:
Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? I sure hope not. That would be one hell of a bloody encounter. |
|
Well, while that is not exactly helpful from their perspective the people were being paid by a foreign power to spy for them. We have arrested Israeli spies etc....over the years even though they are allies etc....
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? I sure hope not. That would be one hell of a bloody encounter. If we fought that war in any other way than old school tactics (ie. carpet bombing for weeks...kill everyone) we would be in DEEP SHIT. And we would "lose." |
|
Did anybody ever find out or hear anymore about what kind of top-secret, super-stealth helicopter we were using over there?
I mean, there should have been some pictures of them leaked by now. It's not like we threw them all into the ocean after we "killed" OBL. |
|
Our problem is we don't know how to buy allies, let's give 'em another $10 Billion...........yeah that ought to do it
|
|
Quoted: Our $2B per year friends And to think they could be the same friends for $0 per year. |
|
Quoted:
Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? My wife has been predicting that for about 8 years now. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? My wife has been predicting that for about 8 years now. Except you won't get very many Americans cheering and rah-rah-rah-ing another invasion today. It was really awesome to see our military go kick the crap out of Talibans and Iraqis ten years ago. Today? Not going to happen. Nobody is going to greenlight yet another endless slog. Pakistan has been "the next Afghanistan" for years now... except we cannot invade them, so we have to pretend they're our friends. The Pakistani government has to pretend to be our friends while extorting us for billions of dollars a year, and then try to convince their own people that they aren't US toadies. When our goal was to knock over the Taliban and deny support to al-Quaeda, we had something we could point at and say, "This is what will constitute victory". It was achievable and meaningful. Well, we did it years ago. Now, what state would constitute "victory" that will allow the hawks to say "We won, we won, we get to go home now!" There is no such animal. The hawks tell us we have to stay there for 50 or 100 years. And, meanwhile, what they claim we must stay in Afghanistan to fight goes on right across the border in Pakistan. When there is no achievable state that you can agree means "victory", then to continue to fight is pointless and counterproductive. It's years past the time we left that part of the world to it's own devices. Even Europe cannot claim to be worried about "terrorism", when they're busily importing Third World Muslim immigrants as quickly as they can, and allowing them to take over huge swaths of their cities. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? My wife has been predicting that for about 8 years now. Except you won't get very many Americans cheering and rah-rah-rah-ing another invasion today. It was really awesome to see our military go kick the crap out of Talibans and Iraqis ten years ago. Today? Not going to happen. Nobody is going to greenlight yet another endless slog. Pakistan has been "the next Afghanistan" for years now... except we cannot invade them, so we have to pretend they're our friends. The Pakistani government has to pretend to be our friends while extorting us for billions of dollars a year, and then try to convince their own people that they aren't US toadies. When our goal was to knock over the Taliban and deny support to al-Quaeda, we had something we could point at and say, "This is what will constitute victory". It was achievable and meaningful. Well, we did it years ago. Now, what state would constitute "victory" that will allow the hawks to say "We won, we won, we get to go home now!" There is no such animal. The hawks tell us we have to stay there for 50 or 100 years. And, meanwhile, what they claim we must stay in Afghanistan to fight goes on right across the border in Pakistan. When there is no achievable state that you can agree means "victory", then to continue to fight is pointless and counterproductive. It's years past the time we left that part of the world to it's own devices. Even Europe cannot claim to be worried about "terrorism", when they're busily importing Third World Muslim immigrants as quickly as they can, and allowing them to take over huge swaths of their cities. Secretly deploy missile and air defense assets to India and Afghanistan. Take out their nukes with air and SF. Tell India they'll get a bajillion a year in aid money if they mop the floor with Pakistan. Provide air support. ??? Profit. TR85. |
|
I may be over thinking it, but I'm not so sure I believe they were really "arrested". I know that's what is being reported, but c'mon...
The Paki's aren't totally on our side. But isn't it just as plausible that being "arrested" was a cover for getting them out of the general population- and for eventual safe passage out of the country? There was a bounty on UBL's head after all. I would hope whoever helped us with getting him wouldn't just be left high and dry to live out the rest of their life in Pakistan after rolling over on UBL... Is that such a crazy thought? |
|
"We have a strong relationship with our Pakistani counterparts and work through issues when they arise," CIA spokeswoman Marie Harf told Fox News."Director Panetta had productive meetings last week in Islamabad. It's a crucial partnership, and we will continue to work together in the fight against Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups who threaten our country and theirs."
taken from here I would not trust them nor would I continue to give them money or any sort of assistance. |
|
Quoted: Where is that stealth tail rotor anyway? We bought it back from them. ABCNews.com A U.S. official said then he did not know if the Pakistanis had offered a peek to the Chinese, but said he would be "shocked" if the Chinese hadn't already been given access to the damaged aircraft. Lapan did not say whether or not there is evidence the Chinese had been allowed to see the pieces of the helicopter before it was returned to the U.S. |
|
So if we go in from one side maybe India can go in from the other?
|
|
Quoted:
So if we go in from one side maybe India can go in from the other? Some in the Pakistani military are apparently already PARANOID that India is getting involved in Afghanistan in order to "surround" them. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Hmmm, Pakistan, the next Afghanistan? I sure hope not. That would be one hell of a bloody encounter. If we fought that war in any other way than old school tactics (ie. carpet bombing for weeks...kill everyone) we would be in DEEP SHIT. And we would "lose." Nuking them would be faster. |
|
Quoted:
This is why "kill 'em all" is the only workable foreign policy. Somewhat truthful here. In USSR days, you did not arrest informants to the KGB. The KGB will kill you if you are lucky, but could also target your family instead as a form of torture. The communist party knew that fear was their best incentive and had no problem using it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
So if we go in from one side maybe India can go in from the other? Some in the Pakistani military are apparently already PARANOID that India is getting involved in Afghanistan in order to "surround" them. That's not paranoia...that's "strategic depth." |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
So if we go in from one side maybe India can go in from the other? Some in the Pakistani military are apparently already PARANOID that India is getting involved in Afghanistan in order to "surround" them. They should be paranoid they're playing a deadly game against the most powerful nation the world has ever known. Frankly I'd have no problem at this point going to war with Pakistan. We have to send the world a message that you can't betray the United States of America when you've pledged your support or we open ourselves up to backstabbing for all of time. Destroy Pakistan. Remove their nukes either through capture or destruction. I rate them as one of the most dangerous nations to our national security on earth. Believe me if Paksitan saw any benefit to them whatsoever they'd gladly hand over a nuclear weapon the Taliban or al Qaeda. They're foolish and their evil, which is a deadly combination. Pakistan is the only thing that stands in our way of victory in Afghansitan. Time to remove it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Where is that stealth tail rotor anyway? We bought it back from them. ABCNews.com A U.S. official said then he did not know if the Pakistanis had offered a peek to the Chinese, but said he would be "shocked" if the Chinese hadn't already been given access to the damaged aircraft. Lapan did not say whether or not there is evidence the Chinese had been allowed to see the pieces of the helicopter before it was returned to the U.S. Bought it from them. Can't believe we paid one red cent to such a piss ant nation. Just like I can't believe we had to pay to get our CIA Contractor. We look so incredibly weak to the world it puts us all in danger. We now go on bended knee to ask the nation of Pakistan for every little thing and offer them treasure as well. Who the fuck do the Pakistanies think they are? We could buy and sell them a million times over and completely remove them from the face of the earth in 33 minutes. Our weakness is what will be our end and history will record it as such. Roman Empire didn't last for one thousand years, because it "asked" weaker nations to do the right thing. |
|
Quoted:
Our problem is we don't know how to buy allies, let's give 'em another $10 Billion...........yeah that ought to do it or the allies we buy won't stay bought |
|
A good read:
Pakistan's Risky China Card. China has been reluctant to admit military ambitions that have long been open secrets: for example its plans to launch an aircraft carrier were only admitted this month. Comments from senior Chinese military, such as, "We can no longer accept the Indian Ocean as only an ocean of the Indians. ... We are taking armed conflicts in the region into account," have also caused concern.
China's purported attempts to build a "string of pearls" of naval bases around India, never convincingly denied, add to the unease about Beijing's intentions. Talk by Chinese military officers of building the world's strongest military and displacing the U.S. as global hegemon, by war if necessary, also raises troubling questions about the balance of power in China between the politicians and the military. Even so, the way that Beijing expressed support for Pakistan after the killing of Osama bin Laden is troubling. Friendship between the two countries goes back a long way. Pakistan opened the door to resumption of ties between China and the U.S. by permitting Henry Kissinger's secret flight to Beijing in 1971. More dangerously, China also effectively masterminded Pakistan's acquisition of nuclear weapons by giving it 50 kilograms of weapons-grade enriched uranium, tons of uranium hexafluoride for centrifuges and detailed plans of nuclear weapons. The security of those weapons must now be in question after Taliban terrorists last month successfully attacked a Pakistan naval air base in Karachi, claiming revenge for the killing of bin Laden. Pakistan played its China card after bin Laden's death, sending prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani to Beijing. Premier Wen Jiabao promised that China would be an "all-weather strategic partner" for Pakistan and gifted 50 new JF-17 Thunder multirole aircraft as Pakistan negotiates for new stealth technology aircraft. Defense minister Ahmed Mukhtar disclosed that Pakistan had "asked our Chinese brothers to please build a naval base at Gwadar" close to the border with Iran. What has this military hardware to do with Pakistan's very real problems of a troubled economy, a wretched education system and the active presence of Islamic terrorists who kill hundreds of Pakistanis every week? Given attested reports of thousands of Chinese troops already in the sensitive regions of Gilgit and Baltistan along the Karakorum highway, supposedly helping Pakistan with new infrastructure projects, it is hard to escape the conclusion that an opportunistic Beijing is using hapless Pakistan to put further pressure on India, and undercut India's economic miracle by pushing Delhi to spend more on defense. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.