Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
User Panel

Posted: 4/27/2001 8:43:25 AM EDT
Should Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh be allowed to take even one more
life by consuming the corpse of an animal at his last meal?  People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) asked his jailors to deny him this final
killing.  The Pilot's Dave Addis took McVeigh's side and spelled out the
admitted terrorist's "right " to consume flesh as long as it meets
penitentiary guidelines (April 20 column).

innocent victims" and feels PETA's request demeans the human victims of
McVeigh's despicable act.  I disagree.

I grew up in Oklahoma.  My parents were 15 miles away from the government
building when the bomb exploded and my next door neighbor, Mary, had her
face blown off.  Some of my friends worked to pull bodies from the rubble.
When I say this bombing struck home, these are not idle words.  Along with
the rest of the nation, and particularly with my fellow Oklahomans, I
watched the devastation in horror, realizing my mom could have been in that
building, my baby could have been in that day care center.  

But my compassion for living beings is not limited to people.  Without
diminishing the significance of what happened to the men, women and children
in that Oklahoma City building, I can also feel the terrible injustice of
killing animals for food we don't really need (and would be better off
without, according to top nutritionists).   Meat is not just what you serve
up on a platter at dinnertime.  It is the flesh of living, thinking,
suffering animals who feel pain every bit as much as we do, are horrified at

the sights and smells of the slaughterhouse and are afraid to die.

Having compassion for these beings does not mean I care one whit less about
the people who died in Oklahoma City.  It just means that I've looked beyond

the neat packages wrapped in plastic in the tidy grocery store and found a
bloody, ugly nightmare that millions of animals endure every day.  As a
recent joint investigation by NBC's Dateline and the Washington Post
revealed, many animals are conscious as they move down the slaughterhouse
butchering lines.  In violation of federal law, fully conscious pigs are
screaming as they are dropped into tanks of boiling water and cows are
looking workers in the eye as their hooves are cut off.

Whether or not one chooses to admit it, cooking and eating bits of an animal

killed solely for that purpose is a form of violence.  When we eat meat, we
participate in this grim world of the modern American meat industry.

So my question remains:  Why should a man who has already senselessly
slaughtered so many be allowed to take part in more suffering?  The Oklahoma

City bombing is one of the greatest tragedies in our country's history. But
if we leave it there, we do the victims a disservice. When something so
happens, we should all reflect on it and ask ourselves what we can do to
decrease the violence and suffering in the world and in our own lives.  Or
are we so entrenched in our dietary habits that we will even defend a mass
murderer's desire to eat steak rather than acknowledge our own part in the

I care about humans and I care about animals.  I wouldn't murder people and
don't kill and eat animals either.  The best kind of compassion, I believe,
is the kind that encompasses all who are capable of suffering.  

Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top