Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
And they weren't even regular Air Force, they were National Guard.
View Quote
??Whats wrong with the National Guard?
View Quote
I didn't say there's anything wrong with the National Guard. Obviously they were the only ones up there defending our country. I'm just surprised that out of all the fighters we have only four were in the air during the attacks. What if this was an all out attack? We wouldn't of had sufficient air cover.
View Quote
All out air attack? From where? From who? Martians?
Its true there were only 2 air defense aircraft over the north east at the time, and only 2 more over the central Atlantic coast. And they were spotted to be closest to the New London, CN sub base and Norfolk and the Navy yards.
There is no great threat out there that requires the large fleets of interceptors that we had during the 1950's. However, its quite clear that they had let the CAP get too thin, although there is no danger of the pairs of F15's or F16's being overwhelmed, they were now covering so big a area that their reaction times to a incident were no longer adaquate.
Flight 94 WAS almost shot down, there was at least one ANG F16 chasing it down from behind that was spotted over the crash site no more than 5 min later perhaps as little as 2min. This has led to the persistant belief amongst tin foil hat types that it WAS shot down. The two F16s that had failed to get to Washington to stop the Pentagon crash would have beat Flight 94 to Washington and been waiting for it. Had the passengers not acted, it would have been shot down before it crossed the beltway.
They do need to increase the number of CAP aircraft enough to get a reasonable reaction time back. But that will not require a return to what we had during the Cold War.