Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 12/29/2001 9:19:29 PM EST
[Last Edit: 12/29/2001 9:21:28 PM EST by cc48510]
[url]http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/22/2551.html[/url] 22 USC 35, Sec. 2551.
Sec. 2551. - Congressional statement of purpose An ultimate goal of the United States is a world which is free from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of armaments; in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law; and in which international adjustments to a changing world are achieved peacefully. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide impetus toward this goal by addressing the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament. The Secretary of State must have the capacity to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, psychological, and technological information upon which realistic arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy must be based. The Secretary shall have the authority, under the direction of the President, to carry out the following primary functions: (1) The preparation for and management of United States participation in international negotiations and implementation fora in the arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament field. (2) The conduct, support, and coordination of research for arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy formulation. (3) The preparation for, operation of, or direction of, United States participation in such control systems as may become part of United States arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament activities. (4) The dissemination and coordination of public information concerning arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament
View Quote
Link Posted: 12/29/2001 9:33:59 PM EST
Here's some more I found:
Notes on Sec. 2561 to 2566. Section 2561, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 21, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632, related to establishment of United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Section 2562, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 22, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632; Pub. L. 88-426, title III, Sec. 305(17)(A), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 424; Pub. L. 94-141, title I, Sec. 145, Nov. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 758; Pub. L. 96-66, Sec. 1(a), Sept. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 98-202, Sec. 2, Dec. 2, 1983, 97 Stat. 1381; Pub. L. 103-236, title VII, Sec. 705, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 492, related to appointment and duties of Director. Section 2563, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 23, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632; Pub. L. 88-426, title III, Sec. 305(17)(B), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 424; Pub. L. 96-66, Sec. 1(b), Sept. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 101-216, title I, Sec. 102, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1853, related to appointment and powers and duties of Deputy Director. Section 2564, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 24, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632; Pub. L. 88-426, title III, Sec. 305(17)(C), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 424, related to number, appointment, and powers and duties of Assistant Directors. Section 2565, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 25, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632; Pub. L. 103-236, title VII, Sec. 706, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 492, related to establishment of bureaus, offices, and divisions within Agency. Section 2566, Pub. L. 87-297, title II, Sec. 26, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 632; Pub. L. 103-236, title VII, Sec. 707, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 493, related to appointment, function, and term of Scientific and Policy Advisory Committee EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105-277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title
View Quote
The Law was gutted in 1998 by a small rider on a large Omnibus Act. But, it appears there are still provisions for the President to cooperate with the UN, et al. on Global Disarmamant.
Link Posted: 12/29/2001 9:40:38 PM EST
This part was repealed by a Bill from john McCain. This section required the Arms Control Council to report its activities to Congress. McCain in 1995 created a bill setting out that such reports would cease in May 2000.
Notes on Sec. 2579. CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 87-297, title III, Sec. 308, formerly Sec. 39, as added Pub. L. 100-213, Sec. 4, Dec. 24, 1987, 101 Stat. 1445; amended Pub. L. 103-236, title VII, Sec. 719(f), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 502; renumbered Sec. 308 and amended Pub. L. 105-277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, Sec. 1223(21), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681-772, which required the Director of the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (whose functions were transferred to the Secretary of State under section 6512 of this title) to provide an annual report to Congress on studies relating to arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament issues, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104-66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 155 of House Document No. 103-7
View Quote
Link Posted: 12/30/2001 11:52:44 AM EST
I think this all originates from PUBLIC LAW # 87-297 (1961), and State Department document 7277. It seems to be real proof that the UN is up to no good. At least I've never seen anyone contradict this info. [url]http://www.users.voicenet.com/~wbacon/stdk7277.html[/url] [url]http://surfboard.surfside.net/bg/index/7277code_nn4.html[/url] [url]http://gr.netfirms.com/banking/globalists.htm[/url]
Link Posted: 12/30/2001 12:10:11 PM EST
About two years ago I watched in disbelief as Madeline Albright went to Geneva and signed an international security act that outlined the new global police force and among other things the complete disarmament of the US citizenry by 2008. Now, this was on a main stream network, possibly CSPAN, can anyone confirm this information? I was dumb founded! I may be completely in left field here, but I am pretty sure I heard this correctly. Kentlik
Link Posted: 12/30/2001 1:10:50 PM EST
Haven't seen that deadline before. I'll bet they were counting on algore winning to have any chance at that 2008 deadline. Now they'll have to move it back at least 8 years.
Link Posted: 12/31/2001 3:58:32 AM EST
You know what sux about this chapter, it is deceptive in it's putative application. If you read it quickly, and look at the general provisions, it looks as if it is an effort at foriegn arms reductions. However, the legislation authorizes "elimination" of any weapons and "disarmament" pursuant to international treaties, which could have effect domestically. Those who proffered the legislation and/or signed on to it, may or may not have ever intended such applicaton. However, that's no excuse. I think it's a potentially dangerous peice of law.
Sec. 2552. - Definitions As used in this chapter - (a) The terms ''arms control'' and ''disarmament'' mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace. (b) The term ''Government agency'' means any executive department, commission, agency, independent establishment, corporation wholly or partly owned by the United States which is an instrumentality of the United States, or any board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, authority, administration, or other establishment in the executive branch of Government
View Quote
Link Posted: 12/31/2001 3:10:43 PM EST
Link Posted: 12/31/2001 3:14:34 PM EST
Come and get em... [50]
Link Posted: 12/31/2001 3:51:35 PM EST
JFK put this in motion in 1961? I think.
Link Posted: 1/1/2002 12:04:09 PM EST
In September 1961, President Kennedy delivered a speech entitled "Freedom From War" at the UN in which he presented the United States program for complete disarmament of the entire world - except for the United Nations which would become the only military power on earth. Kennedy's three-stage plan, produced by SoS Dean Rusk and SoD Robert McNamara (all three who belonged to the CFR) was to be implemented over many years and called for all nations to give up their military power while arming the United Nations. The final step stated: "progressive controlled disarmament ... would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force." Civilian disarmament is a given. This plan is still in existance and is official government agenda. Don't be fooled by brief setbacks for the gun grabbers. This thing has been rolling along for 40 years already! Moe
Link Posted: 1/3/2002 8:43:44 PM EST
[Last Edit: 1/3/2002 8:49:42 PM EST by Bostonterrier97]
We're going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily -- given the political realities -- going to be very modest. . . . [W]e'll have to start working again to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen the next law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we'd be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. [B]Our ultimate goal -- total control of handguns in the United States -- is going to take time. . . .[/B] The first problem is to slow down the number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to [b]get handguns registered.[/b] The final problem is to [b]make possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition-except for the military, police, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors-totally illegal.[/b] -Richard Harris, A Reporter at Large: Handguns, New Yorker, July 26, 1976, at 53, 58 (quoting Pete Shields, founder of Handgun Control, Inc.) In fact, the assault weapons ban will have no significant effect either on the crime rate or on personal security. Nonetheless, it is a good idea . . . . [b]Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.[/b] -Charles Krauthammer (nationally syndicated columnist), Disarm the Citizenry. But Not Yet, Washington Post, Apr. 5, 1996
Link Posted: 1/4/2002 1:32:39 AM EST
I guess its allright for the Government to put an automatic weapon in my hands at seventeen and send me to some 3rd world country too almost get killed to uphold the Bill of Rights for every US citizen including the ones trying to change the Bill of Rights, but its not allright for me and many other people (US Vets) to own firearms to hunt, sport shooting and most of all PROTECT THE LAND WE LOVE MOST but fear our own Government,remember if it was not for people like us, they would'nt have a Government or a country to run !!!!!
Link Posted: 1/4/2002 2:43:36 AM EST
[Last Edit: 1/4/2002 2:45:50 AM EST by oneshot1kill]
Link Posted: 1/4/2002 5:38:51 AM EST
Most Americans will decide it must be a good idea if the govt. and Dan, Tom, and Peter tell them it's a good idea.
Link Posted: 1/9/2002 12:55:21 PM EST
You hit the nail on the head about the Media. If you tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth. They have a HUGE impact on people's perception about the issue. Until they report unbiased (Yea, right) and quit covering everything "Bad" about firearms including yearly coverage of ALL school shootings, most of the public will never know the real story. I'll get off the soap box now.
Link Posted: 1/9/2002 5:31:01 PM EST
[Last Edit: 1/9/2002 5:33:58 PM EST by cc48510]
The rank and file are usually much more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. [red]Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda[/red] The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly . . . it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over. [red]Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda[/red]
View Quote
If you wish the sympathy of the broad masses, you must tell them the crudest and most stupid things. [red]Adolf Hitler[/red] What luck for the rulers that men do not think. [red]Adolf Hitler[/red] The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force. [red]Adolf Hitler -- Mein Kampf, 1925[/red] The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it. [red]Adolf Hitler[/red]
View Quote
Link Posted: 1/10/2002 9:33:18 AM EST
Originally Posted By BenDover: Come and get em... [50]
View Quote
Damn well said!!!!!! I'd love to see the first UN blue benny appear on my street. They'd learn we Marines can REALLY shoot.
Top Top