Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Posted: 9/21/2005 5:35:53 AM EDT
I need the case in which the 9th Circuit ruled adding a VFG to an existing pistol did not constitue an AOW.

Thanks
Link Posted: 9/21/2005 5:47:37 AM EDT
Got plans for that new AR pistol, nationwide?

Link Posted: 9/21/2005 12:00:53 PM EDT
???
Link Posted: 9/21/2005 3:11:45 PM EDT
Eh, I just saw your post about your new AR pistol and thought maybe you were looking for a way to attach one. I'd want to, if it were legal.

There was a post on subguns that referred to the U.S. vs. Fix, but I couldn't find anything else on it.
Link Posted: 9/22/2005 8:11:54 PM EDT
I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.


Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 3:14:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 9/23/2005 3:21:46 PM EDT by nationwide]

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.


Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).




Ok, thanks Phil.

I found the US v Fix ruling in an old thread I had archived on my machine, the Davis ruling will help pad my letter to BATFE.

ETA: Uh... which US v Davis???

Google spits out a bunch of drug related cases, nothing I can find yet in relation to this matter. Any idea on which court or perhaps a year for the ruling?

Thanks
Link Posted: 9/26/2005 4:32:46 PM EDT

Originally Posted By nationwide:

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:
I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.


Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).




Ok, thanks Phil.

I found the US v Fix ruling in an old thread I had archived on my machine, the Davis ruling will help pad my letter to BATFE.

ETA: Uh... which US v Davis???

Google spits out a bunch of drug related cases, nothing I can find yet in relation to this matter. Any idea on which court or perhaps a year for the ruling?

Thanks



Sorry about that.

One link of several that will get it for you.
www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/wbardwel/public/nfalist/us_v_davis2.txt


Cite as U.S. v. Davis, Cr. No. 8:93-106, Report of Magistrate,
(D.S.C. June 21, 1993), and Order of Dismissal, September 24, 1993.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ANDERSON DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CRIMINAL NO. 8:93-106
VS. REPORT OF MAGISTRATE

GORDON DAVIS, SANDRA DAVIS,
TAMMY SMITH, AND JERRY SMITH

Link Posted: 9/28/2005 11:54:01 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Phil_in_Seattle:

Sorry about that.

One link of several that will get it for you.
www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/wbardwel/public/nfalist/us_v_davis2.txt



Awesome, thanks Phil!
Top Top