NRA Throws Full Support Behind CARA (HR 701)
Constitution/Conservatism Miscellaneous Keywords: NRA, CARA LAND GRAB
Source: www.paragonpowerhouse.org (email routing)
Published: 8/20/01 Author: J. Zane Walley
Posted on 08/20/2001 20:54:06 PDT by ratcat
Subject: Paragon Urgent Action Alert: A plea to the NRA to drop CARA support
Date sent: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:09:12 -0600
"I will sum this up. NRA is the most powerful lobbying influence in Washington. They have thrown their full machine in support of CARA (HR 701). CARA will provide tens of billions of dollars for the federal Government to take private property from unwilling sellers. NRA refuses to rationally discuss this with attorneys who do not agree with their viewpoint."
To the Paragon List,
Friends, I have been working on an article focusing on the National Rifle Association's (NRA) support of CARA (HR-701). If you are not familiar with CARA, this congressional resolution will provide tens of billions of dollars for the federal Government to take private property from unwilling sellers.
During the course of this article, I spoke with Fred Kelly Grant, a retired Federal attorney, and lawyer for Stewards of the Range. Mr. Grant said that in doing a legal analysis of CARA that he had identified over one dozen clauses that allow the government to force private property owners to sell their land.
I also called Susan Lamson, the NRA Director of Wildlife and Conservation. I asked Ms. Lamson why NRA supported and lobbied for CARA, and she said that their analysts thought it would be good for wildlife. I asked her if she knew that CARA contained clauses to force the sale of private property. She very snidely replied, "That is NOT the opinion of the NRA attorneys." "Ok", I said, which NRA attorneys did the Bill analysis?" Ms. Lamson blasted me saying "That is none of your business." Then I asked, "Mrs. Lamson would you consider having your attorneys meet with property rights lawyers with a differing point of view?" I asked. "No! She replied very bluntly. " It would be a waste of time because, It would not change our position on this bill.