Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 9/8/2001 8:00:25 PM EST
Are there any? Who makes them?
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 8:12:49 PM EST
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 8:22:34 PM EST
Why? Because I'm running out of stuff I can do to my AR! I don't ever wanna be done building it. As long as there is something more i can add/do/install I get to make a trip to the range to try it out. [img]wsphotofews.excite.com/029/Wc/OX/7S/hB60172.jpg[/img] [img]wsphotofews.excite.com/031/Ef/i7/SK/ml93846.jpg[/img]
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 8:28:16 PM EST
Check this out: http://www.jpar15.com/recoil.htm I have on installed on an AR-15 and it works real nice.
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 8:34:32 PM EST
Thanks, thats pretty much what I had in mind. Do you find that it makes reports any louder or kick up a lot of dust from prone position? What about its flash reduction propeties?
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 9:07:07 PM EST
I'm not sure about the dust or the flash part. As far as the sound goes, when shooting the rifle I don't notice anything different. When I'm done shooting, people standing on either side of me are giving me dirty looks though. The muzzle brake combined with the weight of my rifle totally eliminates any muzzle rise. When shooting at a target my scope never leaves the target. Here's a pic: [img]http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=182940&a=13371793&p=17338222&Sequence=0&res=high[/img]
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 9:17:20 PM EST
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 9:33:00 PM EST
That is the JP enterprises muzzle brake. Machined one out to .330 and installed on FAL with heavy barrel. Total rifle weight is 17.5 lbs. with mercury recoil reducer. Recoil was definitly improved by the brake, but hearing protection is an absolute must. My eardrum is partially healed now, but I used to feel my brain push into my ear if I sneezed after using this device. Never tried one on the AR. A .308 uses 50 gr. of H380 while a .223 uses 27.5. It may be easier on the ears with less volume of gas being burned.
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 9:37:08 PM EST
Take that riser and delta forces cheek rest off. It will shoot more accurately at different ranges with your scope closer to the bore centerline. You already have a high rise DPMS upper receiver. Get tall rings if you have to, but stacking that shit increases the chances for problems.
Link Posted: 9/8/2001 10:40:56 PM EST
Wow Princeton, that's pretty sweet. Definetly considering the JP, but still looking. Grimshaw, I actually haven't had any problems with the optics being that far up. I have the riser on there for my other scope thats in the shop and uses another mount. Also, whats that mercury recoil reducer you mentioned?
Link Posted: 9/24/2001 11:30:26 AM EST
Have you looked at the Smith Enterprise brake? http://www.smithenterprise.com/muzzle_brakes.html I have the setscrew version on the board for sale if you'd like to see it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?id=51452
Link Posted: 9/24/2001 11:42:12 AM EST
I haven't found it to be necessary on mine, although there is a slight muzzle rise. [img]wsphotofews.excite.com/024/82/eW/eu/EG88106.jpg[/img]
Top Top