You may remember here shooting her ex-lover's wife in the face some years back.


http://longislandpress.com/v02/i37040916/amyfisher.asp

So now she is lecturing us on assault weapons?

Good grief.

I got a reply from a post I made to her column. A man responded to it. Here it goes with another reply by me.

Mr. Woliver,

  There's the problem right there. You stated what
happens when troubled kids get a hold of guns. How
about we start with the TROUBLED KIDS? Or is there no
effort to curb the problem where is starts? I have to
ask... what kind of name calling was there in my
email? Please look at it again.
Amy was convicted and sentenced for a violent felony.
She gave up many rights as soon as she made the
decisions she made. One of which was to legally own a
gun. Now she wants to take away my rights to own them
even though I've been nothing but a respectable law
abidding citizen? I think you should rethink your
hiring process but that's just my opinion.
As for the facts regarding her particular case...
everything I've seen says that she was shot in the
head. If you'd like to somehow separate the face from
the head that's fine by me. Doesn't somehow make
things right be me though.

Respectfully,

G


---
wrote:

> yes, i understand. YOU have all the correct
> information about guns. I will be sure to tell Amy,
> who it seems has a lot more experience knowing about
> what happens when troubled kids get a hold of guns
> because of loose gun laws than you do because you
> never shot anyone in the head. And for the record,
> she never shot anyone in the head. check your facts,
> buddy.
> and a suggestion for the next time you guys send out
> these group mailings. the ones that make a
> difference are the ones that make clear points
> without resorting to nasty name calling. Unless
> that's really how you want to represent yourself.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 12:32 PM
> To: Amy Fisher
> Subject: Web Inquiry: Amy Fisher
>
>
> name=
> email=
> message=
>
>   Your column is riddled with inaccuracies. Please
> do research before you
> ink up paper and waste the precious trees we have.
> Excuse me but I find it
> very ironic that you're doing this type of piece
> following your own crimes
> towards people. You absolutely should not be able to
> own one of these
> weapons as I'm sure everyone will agree. Myself
> however... I've never shot
> anyone in the head.