Member Login
Member Login
Member Login
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 8:57:06 PM EDT
I can name a few good movies now and if I try some bad movies then. Inception, Nolan Batman Trilogy, Prometheus, Castaway on the Moon, Moon, Marvel Cinematic Universe, and The Artist, just to name a few.
As a genre, the late 80's to early/mid 90's had alot of crappy, no-plot action flicks. That genre has sort of died, though I hear Dredd is pretty good modern version of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 8:58:48 PM EDT
Quoted:
I can name a few good movies now and if I try some bad movies then. Inception, Juno, Prometheus, Castaway on the Moon, Moon, Marvel Cinematic Universe, and The Artist, just to name a few. As a genre, the late 80's to early/mid 90's had alot of crappy, no-plot action flicks. That genre has sort of died, though I hear Dredd is pretty good modern version of it. I'm not saying all movies made now suck, what I'm saying is that I feel that the experience is a bit more watered down due to the ease of implementing CGI to make a movie. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 8:59:14 PM EDT
Movies like Blade Runner and Star Wars 4-6, prove you don't need CGI to make a good Sci-Fi movie.
Practical effects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CGI in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 9:15:52 PM EDT
There have always been bad movies, there will always be bad movies.
4/5 of the movie ads you see on TV are for bad movies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:00:38 PM EDT
Quoted:
Movies like Blade Runner and Star Wars 4-6, prove you don't need CGI to make a good Sci-Fi movie. Practical effects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CGI in my opinion. This. I fucking gate CGI. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:30:51 PM EDT
Compare "Tora, Tora, Tora!" to "Red tails".
The visuals, not the script, acting or story line. Yeah. Three headed aliens shitting fire, getting shot with Laser slingshots, looks better with high end CGI and the artistry Lucas used in his first couple of flicks, but that is about it. Nothing replaces "Damn near real" like "Damn near real". |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:37:47 PM EDT
Oh god, remember the tank "battle" in Red Dawn?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:39:50 PM EDT
Quoted:
Oh god, remember the tank "battle" in Red Dawn? Cheesy? Yeah. But the fact that they were using real tanks made it a little bit better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:43:27 PM EDT
I can remember recently watching Raiders of the Lost Ark and thinking how awesome the "flying wing" fight scene was.
All real, long shots...really impressive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:47:21 PM EDT
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh god, remember the tank "battle" in Red Dawn? Cheesy? Yeah. But the fact that they were using real tanks made it a little bit better. I thought they built them from somekind of earth moving equipment... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:48:20 PM EDT
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh god, remember the tank "battle" in Red Dawn? Cheesy? Yeah. But the fact that they were using real tanks made it a little bit better. I thought they built them from somekind of earth moving equipment... Okay, real-looking tanks then. Real vehicles 
Too lazy to actually go look up what they used 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 10:52:23 PM EDT
CGI can be great, like most of it in Fight Club.
If it's good then you don't know that it's CGI. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2012 11:14:46 PM EDT
Quoted:
Movies like Blade Runner and Star Wars 4-6, prove you don't need CGI to make a good Sci-Fi movie. Practical effects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CGI in my opinion. TV Shows like Blake's 7 prove you need much in special effects to make a good Sci Fi story. ___________________________________________________________________ (" Oh, yes, of course. Well, let me tell you something, Blake, as far as I am concerned, you are just another piece of cargo. Remember that and you might just survive the journey. Do you understand?"––Raiker, (w,stte), "Blake's 7") |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/9/2012 12:24:26 AM EDT
Really, it's the stories themselves. Audiences want more fights and car chases and things blowing up now. In a lot of genre's, a film will get panned unless there's some new technical feat. But the stories these days so often basically suck. Audiences would not be able to sit still for what constituted great filmmaking of the 40s 50s and early 60s.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/9/2012 12:46:36 AM EDT
Quoted:
Really, it's the stories themselves. Audiences want more fights and car chases and things blowing up now. In a lot of genre's, a film will get panned unless there's some new technical feat. But the stories these days so often basically suck. Audiences would not be able to sit still for what constituted great filmmaking of the 40s 50s and early 60s. Like "The Internecine Project"? For the benefit of our studio audience at home, what we have is an enticing movie where a man sits alone in a room for a lot of the footage. In the MAD satire on the FBI series, they highlighted how often in that series, it seemed like there was a car chase at the end that brought the episode together, to a conclusion. I don't know if that is accurate it or not, I didn't see that much of the series.....but it sounds a lot like what we have now. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ("Kill him and let's see who picks up the body."––the enemy about finding out who Remo works for, (w,stte), "Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins") |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world’s largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2021 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
