Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 3/26/2002 7:55:15 AM EST
[img]http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20020325/i/1017018800.3758211141.jpg[/img] I can't BELIEVE Gwyneth Paltrow is proud enough of *those* to bother showing them off! [url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/020324/170/1avwc.html[/url]
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 7:59:46 AM EST
They look like a perfect set of 34B's to me... nice and petite! [:P] Remember, the bigger they are, the further they fall
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 8:10:55 AM EST
I think that says "squeeze me" in Brille.[B)]
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 8:59:57 AM EST
What is wrong with is guy. An attractive chick wears a see through. And you are complaining? antiUSSA, I agree with you man. Those guys will still be perky in 20 years
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 9:22:53 AM EST
That is a FUGLY dress but I don't mind seeing teats!
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 11:57:01 AM EST
Where's necromancer to give us his appraisal? [:D]
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 12:00:04 PM EST
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 12:07:27 PM EST
It's not bad because it's see through but at different angles, especially when she was presenting the Oscar, it looked like she had lumpy boobs going down the side of her torso. Sorta like the Michelin man. It's wasn't a good design for such a hottie.
Link Posted: 3/26/2002 12:13:05 PM EST
The eye makeup reminds me of the gymnast-replicant in Bladerunner...
Top Top