User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:25:08 PM EDT
[#1]
I am surprised there hasn't been an outcry from the SJW's and Muslim groups.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:29:07 PM EDT
[#2]
That affidavit. He just. can't. say. muslims. (I'm sure he was told not to.)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:30:42 PM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:31:22 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am surprised there hasn't been an outcry from the SJW's and Muslim groups. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:32:11 PM EDT
[#5]
Genital Jihad
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:32:39 PM EDT
[#6]
Muslims doing Muslim shit.
Inshallah. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:34:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Where is the feminist outrage?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:34:31 PM EDT
[#8]
Nothing to see here folks.
Constitutionally protected privacy right. Just like abortion. Move along ... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 1:58:25 PM EDT
[#9]
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:00:09 PM EDT
[#10]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:02:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok Don't conflate FGM with male circ. It's intellectually dishonest (eg appealing to emotion, strawman). Argue for or against circ as a separate issue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:05:16 PM EDT
[#12]
They should burn
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:05:54 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:08:17 PM EDT
[#14]
savages
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:11:17 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok It's typically practiced in medieval societies where women are expected to be broodmares and property. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:13:56 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:17:10 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok if water and soap was not present then yes circumcision make sense but if you are a person that cleans and takes personal hygiene seriously then it is a none issue. But go on calling people retarded for not wanting to mutilate little boys or girls. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:19:00 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
yes because making your penis shorter is so awesome its retarded... if water and soap was not present then yes circumcision make sense but if you are a person that cleans and takes personal hygiene seriously then it is a none issue. But go on calling people retarded for not wanting to mutilate little boys or girls. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:19:52 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
yes because making your penis shorter is so awesome its retarded... if water and soap was not present then yes circumcision make sense but if you are a person that cleans and takes personal hygiene seriously then it is a none issue. But go on calling people retarded for not wanting to mutilate little boys or girls. edit: Here I made another one.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:23:00 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
yes because making your penis shorter is so awesome its retarded... if water and soap was not present then yes circumcision make sense but if you are a person that cleans and takes personal hygiene seriously then it is a none issue. But go on calling people retarded for not wanting to mutilate little boys or girls. 
2) Soap and water reduces the transmission rate of stds? Intradasting.....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:24:14 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am surprised there hasn't been an outcry from the SJW's and Muslim groups. They should impale these fuckers on spikes and then drown them in molten salt. Fucking savages. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 2:46:09 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am surprised there hasn't been an outcry from the SJW's and Muslim groups. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 3:13:00 PM EDT
[#23]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 3:57:04 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They are removing the clitorus entirely. Not at all the same thing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok They're both wrong, period. Arguing which one is more wrong is fucking semantics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 4:04:19 PM EDT
[#25]
What about the animal parents that are actively seeking these doctors out with the specific intention of have them cut their daughter's clitoris off? Is a claw hammer to the head too lenient?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 4:10:31 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is a claw hammer to the head too lenient? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 4:43:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Can't we just change the law so that if one does a female genital mutilation, the penalty is the loss of one's genitals.
Cut off a clit, lose your dick. Anesthesia not allowed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 4:48:06 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am surprised there hasn't been an outcry from the SJW's and Muslim groups. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 4:48:40 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
pizza? Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 5:25:38 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's still mutilation of a typically underage individual's genitals without their consent. They're both wrong, period. Arguing which one is more wrong is fucking semantics. Oh, look. I found a copy of your medical degree online. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 5:37:18 PM EDT
[#31]
Breaking: i "mutilate" my fingernails about once every other week. To argue how much worse female genital mutilation is is semantics.
I also had a mole removed once. Dear lord think of all the girls with their ears pierced. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 9:59:50 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh, look. I found a copy of your medical degree online. http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t151/sleepdr/Meme%20stuff/948b063ac56bbc03fb37b31a7a40b478_zps2b0yubto.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It's still mutilation of a typically underage individual's genitals without their consent. They're both wrong, period. Arguing which one is more wrong is fucking semantics. http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t151/sleepdr/Meme%20stuff/948b063ac56bbc03fb37b31a7a40b478_zps2b0yubto.jpg I said both are wrong and that arguing which is worse is semantics. Which is exactly what this is; arguing over fucking semantics.
And you fuckers feel the need to argue that chopping off part of an infant boy's penis isn't wrong, doesn't have the risk of serious complications, and doesn't cause any damage? Fuck's sake, man. < Has extremely low sensitivity due to a fucked up circumcision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:11:19 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Aaaaand here we go. Don't conflate FGM with male circ. It's intellectually dishonest (eg appealing to emotion, strawman). Argue for or against circ as a separate issue. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok Don't conflate FGM with male circ. It's intellectually dishonest (eg appealing to emotion, strawman). Argue for or against circ as a separate issue. Do that make it ok now, as long as they just remove or ceremonially nick the clitoral hood? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:11:36 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They are removing the clitorus entirely. Not at all the same thing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yet mutilating the genitals of infant boys is still perfectly ok |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:30:41 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Jesus, Mary and Joseph Stalin, the fuck is wrong with you? I said both are wrong and that arguing which is worse is semantics. Which is exactly what this is; arguing over fucking semantics.
And you fuckers feel the need to argue that chopping off part of an infant boy's penis isn't wrong, doesn't have the risk of serious complications, and doesn't cause any damage? Fuck's sake, man. < Has extremely low sensitivity due to a fucked up circumcision. 1- At NO point did I say that male circumcision was right or wrong here. 2- At NO point did I say there was not a risk of complications with male circumcision. 3- What I did state, essentially, was that this would be like moths to a flame for people wanting to capitalize on the shock value of FGM to pontificate on male circumcision. 4- Get off your martyr high horse and read my personal experience, snowflake. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1984131_Detroit-emergency-room-doctor-charged-with-child-genital-mutilation.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:36:27 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Before you start up on the personal attacks and name calling, I suggest you go peruse the site a little bit. In particular, the COC would be a good place to start. You might also want to brush up on reading comprehension so as not to make idiotic inferences from statements wherein you assert facts not in evidence. You could also read the previous thread on this topic within the last week. (hyperlink below) 1- At NO point did I say that male circumcision was right or wrong here. 2- At NO point did I say there was not a risk of complications with male circumcision. 3- Get off your martyr high horse and read my personal experience, snowflake. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1984131_Detroit-emergency-room-doctor-charged-with-child-genital-mutilation.html Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Jesus, Mary and Joseph Stalin, the fuck is wrong with you? I said both are wrong and that arguing which is worse is semantics. Which is exactly what this is; arguing over fucking semantics.
And you fuckers feel the need to argue that chopping off part of an infant boy's penis isn't wrong, doesn't have the risk of serious complications, and doesn't cause any damage? Fuck's sake, man. < Has extremely low sensitivity due to a fucked up circumcision. 1- At NO point did I say that male circumcision was right or wrong here. 2- At NO point did I say there was not a risk of complications with male circumcision. 3- Get off your martyr high horse and read my personal experience, snowflake. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1984131_Detroit-emergency-room-doctor-charged-with-child-genital-mutilation.html 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:36:27 PM EDT
[#37]
Delete.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2017 10:37:46 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Arguing with physicians re: physician stuff. LOL. GD is awesome. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File