Issue Date: September 27, 2004
Corps shouldn’t jump gun with weapons
By Gregory R. Topp
When it comes to the Army’s XM8 rifle, Marine Corps Systems Command’s wait-and-see attitude is wise for several reasons.
History is replete with instances of the Marine Corps jumping the gun (pardon the pun) and going with an untried weapon system. Perhaps the most stinging was the 1967 adoption of the M16.
The M14, which the Marines had at the time, proved to be a valuable asset to the Marine rifleman because of the rifle’s durability, functionality and power. Then the Corps decided to forgo the tried-and-true Garand action for the new “lighter-weight” M16. The results of choosing this untested, black plastic “Mattel” rifle were disastrous. Many Marines died at the hands of this rifle, due to the lack of a forward assist. If the weapon jammed, it had to be disassembled, cleaned and lubricated, often under fire.
It also should be known that the M14 was deemed “too heavy” for the average infantryman. An unloaded M14 weighs about 9 pounds. The original M16 was in the neighborhood of 7 pounds. By contrast, today’s M16A4 weighs 8 pounds (without any accessories, mind you). You do the math. And today’s pack as fielded by the individual Marine is the heaviest ever — more than 100 pounds.
Fast-forward to Afghanistan in 2001. Many Special Forces troops chose the venerable M14 over the M16A2/A3, due to the 7.62mm round’s ability to reliably kill targets at longer ranges than the 5.56mm M16A2/A3. Additionally, the M14’s ability to shrug off dust storms and keep running engendered operator confidence.
With the M14-versus-M16 debate in mind, SysCom’s reticence in adopting the XM8, an as-yet untried weapon, is very shrewd.
One reason to wait is the need for a replacement round for the 5.56mm. Among the possibilities is the 6.8mm SPC round, which has generated much interest in the firearms community as a successor to the 5.56mm service round. It offers 7.62mm punch in a smaller package.
Another possible successor is the 6mm/.223 round. The 6mm/.223 loading is merely a 5.56mm (.223 Rem) case necked up to a 6mm. It uses a 100-grain bullet at approximately 2,600-2,700 feet per second and has a ballistic coefficient similar to a 7.62mm round. The 6mm is the right round for 7.62mm punch in a 5.56mm package.
What would happen if the Defense Department mandated that we go to a new round after delivery of the first Corps-purchased 5.56mm XM8s? We would have to eat the cost of the production run, while the Army got the 6mm weapons. The Marine Corps would effectively be left out in the cold with the 5.56mm round.
Let’s face it, the 5.56mm, especially in the M855 (green tip) loading, is lackluster against targets past 100 and 150 meters for the M4 and M16, respectively. There are many instances of infantrymen engaging targets three and four times with the shorter-barreled M4s, whereas the M16 has a slightly lower incidence of follow-up hits to stop attackers.
The Corps should campaign for the XM8 in either a 6.8mm SPC or a 6mm/.223 chambering. A bonus to the 6mm/.223 is that the existing M16 family of weapons would require only a barrel change. The bolt and magazines remain compatible. As for the M249 squad automatic weapon, the links and bolt may be retained, again necessitating only a barrel change.
The Corps is right to wait for the XM8, but only in a 6mm loading that would solve many of the stopping power deficiencies of the 5.56mm round. Let the Army, with all of its financial and research laboratory resources, find out what makes the XM8 tick first.
The Corps cannot afford to field an untried weapon on the mean streets of Fallujah.
The writer, a former Metro Denver police officer, is a sergeant and an aviation supply specialist assigned to Commander, Naval Air Forces Pacific in San Diego.