User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 6:59:24 PM EDT
[#1]
If the napkin won't wipe, your claim is made of tripe. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 6:59:39 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin. Plus the bill for all legal fees and court costs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:01:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Case dismissed.
Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs. Next. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:05:51 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Case dismissed. Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs. Next. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:19:31 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good luck collecting. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Case dismissed. Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs. Next. The court always collects. It's either pay up or go to jail until you do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:26:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal. Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some. According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat." That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people." Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return. Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million. Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00 That was predictable.... 
BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:32:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Some black people are really way overy "touchy" about shit. Some are not. Same with homosexuals.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:35:25 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What attorney would take that case? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:41:09 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryTouché. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 7:56:35 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:02:25 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. If I remember, she was holding the cup between her legs with the lid off while driving, trying to mix in creamer or sugar. I don't know about you, but if I tried to hold a fresh cup of coffee in my crotch with the lid removed in a moving vehicle, I'd blame myself if I got burned. Good old Stella Lieback, I think was her name. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:04:01 PM EDT
[#12]
HAHA! Thats funny... Coffee burns, anyone?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:05:05 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: HAHA! Thats funny... Coffee burns, anyone? Without a warning on the cup, how are we to know it's hot enough to burn us?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:05:18 PM EDT
[#14]
"we apologize for underestimating how much of a slob you are and didn't know you would require a diaper for your face"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:08:41 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What attorney would take that case? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal. Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some. According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat." That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people." Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return. Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million. Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00 What attorney would take that case? Russell & Tate Law Firm!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:15:53 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:27:05 PM EDT
[#17]
Lucas actually has a job? I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:32:26 PM EDT
[#18]
It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to
shoot him |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:33:21 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to shoot him It's important to remember that if you're going to hit someone with a napkin, make sure they aren't black. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:33:30 PM EDT
[#20]
Yer supposed to eat it, not wear it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:34:26 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That was predictable....
BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal. Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some. According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat." That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people." Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return. Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million. Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00 That was predictable....
BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims. Da Fuk? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:34:37 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to shoot him Or popcorn. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:35:58 PM EDT
[#23]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:36:39 PM EDT
[#24]
insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return. If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:39:38 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin. This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:43:38 PM EDT
[#26]
They do seem have this thing where they only give one or two napkins, no matter what you order. On the rare occasions I eat McDonald's, I always ask for extra napkins. They still hand over one or two. Finally, I went through with my daughter after school one day. She wanted a drink and some fries. Same thing.
I asked the drive thru halfwit for extra napkins. She handed me two. I told her, that's too many. I only need half that many, and handed one back to her. She took it back, but then didn't seem to know what to do with it. My daughter thought it was the funniest thing she ever saw, and loves to tell that story. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:44:29 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin. This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:44:50 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wouldn't be opposed to a judge walking down to the man, slapping him across the face and ruling in McD's favor. Advocating violence against minorities? Classy! And people wonder why gun owners have a rep for being racist...
j/k |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:46:41 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin. This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff. 
Well, I actually agree with you; I just like using this pic.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:47:58 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime. Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years. It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:51:40 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years. It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime. Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years. It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut. She underwent skin grafts too... My ex-fiancee had scars on her thighs from a ramen noodle incident.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:54:45 PM EDT
[#32]
First world problem.
Meaning it's a problem for the first world when third worlders use the court system to shake down first worlders. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 8:54:48 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years. It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime. Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years. It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut. And yet, she still put hot coffee between her legs, yes? Or was that false, as well? Was a long time ago. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 9:21:41 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In what law book does "you people" always mean black? H. Ross Perot's |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 10:29:34 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
White napkins too. Clearly racist. Genius. Pure unadulterated genius. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 10:45:14 PM EDT
[#36]
Hey, if you can't hit the lottery....make your own
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 10:50:49 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 11:25:54 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Which one? The idiot guy suing or the idiot guy that refuses to give napkins to customers?z Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What a loser. Which one? The idiot guy suing or the idiot guy that refuses to give napkins to customers?z |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 11:31:55 PM EDT
[#39]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 11:34:25 PM EDT
[#40]
Not super related to this thread, but I think it would be funny if someone shot a mcdonald's commercial with typical customers. eg. 350lb lady with facial hair, thong and manly voice saying i'm lovin it
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2014 11:55:52 PM EDT
[#41]
this aggression will not stand man
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 12:00:32 AM EDT
[#42]
Didnt Governor Moonbeam declare a napkin shortage in Kalifornia?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 12:56:31 AM EDT
[#43]
Webster is a cunt
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 1:00:11 AM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal. Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some. According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat." That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people." Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return. Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million. Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 1:49:29 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What lawyer is going to represent this guy, given it's a percentage and a lot of court time. Lawyers are probably lining up at his door. Most attorneys take 1/3 of the settlement plus expenses. That would be 1/2 mil plus if they win. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 1:54:13 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway. Quote HistoryQuoted:
insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.
If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway. You really think the guy had a real "9 to 5" job? He probably just couldn't pick up bottles and cans on the side of the road. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 2:14:34 AM EDT
[#47]
$1.5 million dollars is selling his dignity rather cheaply. ("Madam, we have already established what you are, now we are negotiating your fee")
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 2:16:05 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot. How much did that women get? I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more. Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis. Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously. STOP! NOW! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 2:31:25 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin. Spot on! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2014 2:44:37 AM EDT
[#50]
Just use your shirt sleeve. Gimme Gimme. Retard. Award him exactly 1 napkin.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
