Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
1/25/2018 7:38:29 AM
Posted: 2/1/2006 11:41:09 AM EST
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:49:22 AM EST
GAY!
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:52:10 AM EST
I'd expect nothing finer from a sterling news outlet like MSNBC
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:53:23 AM EST
[Last Edit: 2/1/2006 11:53:53 AM EST by macman37]
hahaha, remember to grade the story.

I gave it a "1".

Edit: Their so-called Safe gun has no way to eject.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:56:17 AM EST
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:56:18 AM EST
I would NEVER buy a gun that had any of those features.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 11:58:23 AM EST
thats almost as bad as the UN going to a country like Syria for facts on human rights.......oh......wait
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 12:02:08 PM EST
I'll stick with being responsible and my drop safety.


"This IS my safety, Captain"




Link Posted: 2/1/2006 12:04:09 PM EST
I'm probably going to get the "Radio Frequency Control" that thing is great.

"The gun user would wear a wristband that contains a small radio transmitter that would send a signal to a receiver in the handle. If a gun user forgets the wristband or the combination isn't recognized because of a glove the gun won't operate."

That's the shit right there. I hear Glock is making that a low cost option next year.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 12:38:48 PM EST
What uses a magazine safety?
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 1:16:14 PM EST
bhp uses one. Not sure of any others.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 1:18:34 PM EST

Originally Posted By kc8ard:
What uses a magazine safety?

IIRC, it's a seperate magazine made to "lock" itself into a semi-auto pistol. It keeps you from loading it by locking the slide forward and not allowing you to insert a loaded mag either. My brother has one issued to him the the NCSHP when they were using Beretta 96's. Seems like I recall it holding 5 rounds too the were released when the mag was unlocked. It had a combination lock on the bottom like a briefcase would have.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 1:28:14 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/1/2006 1:28:43 PM EST by California_Kid]

Originally Posted By kc8ard:

What uses a magazine safety?



My 1915 vintage Belgian Browning .25 has one.

So does my old Colt Vest Pocket. (Pretty much the same gun as the Belgian.)
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 1:32:14 PM EST
Those stupid safety devices are crap. I hope I amass enough weaponry so I will never have to buy one of those crap guns.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 1:37:52 PM EST
I'd say let a company market these gun features.

It will be telling to see how low sales are as opposed to the regular firearm.


But i don't want to say that...lobbyist would want to make every firearm with those features.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 2:09:38 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/1/2006 2:11:25 PM EST by Mauser101]

Originally Posted By Triumph955i:
I'd say let a company market these gun features.

It will be telling to see how low sales are as opposed to the regular firearm.


But i don't want to say that...lobbyist would want to make every firearm with those features.



Sadly that seems to be the way of things in CA. Chamber loaded indicators became required this year on handguns and next year it's magazine disconnects. (may have the two mixed up) Somebody dreams up a safety device and somebody somewhere mandates all guns to have it, nomatter if it's useful on the firearm or an impediment at car washes.

The arcticle didn't really cover any of the safety devices that come standard on most firearms today anyway.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 2:17:43 PM EST
You know that they threw The Weekly Standard in there for "balance."

TWS was their source for the word "the."
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 2:24:29 PM EST
Current rating of 2 based on the votes of 390+ people.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:48:48 PM EST
I like how they only put crime related links and articles around the "gun safety" article.

Fucktards.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:52:38 PM EST

Originally Posted By mattman42:
Current rating of 2 based on the votes of 390+ people.



I gave it a whopping .5 stars
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:53:47 PM EST
[Last Edit: 2/1/2006 3:53:59 PM EST by Triumph955i]
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:57:03 PM EST

Originally Posted By Triumph955i:

Originally Posted By mattman42:
Current rating of 2 based on the votes of 390+ people.



I gave it a whopping .5 stars



+1
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 3:58:53 PM EST
Where's the device that keeps the gun from firing by itself? Isn't that the definition of "gun violence?"
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 4:05:53 PM EST
What a bunch of insane shit! Anybody else notice that they put a story on "Safety" on their 'Crimes and Punishment' page? Libard fucks!
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 4:12:18 PM EST

Originally Posted By macman37:
hahaha, remember to grade the story.

I gave it a "1".




if you do it right you can give it a 0 .5
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 4:49:24 PM EST
I love the utter tripe that passes for journalism today. I gave it a .5 rating. fawkers.
Link Posted: 2/1/2006 5:25:05 PM EST
MSNBC should be renamed MSNBS. Tucker Carlson and Joe Scarborough's shows are the only shows worth watching.
Top Top