It appears that the new "Interceptor" vests that allow pouches and such to be clipped to them were a BIG success in Afghanistan, and are a large part of the explination behind the low number of fatalities in Operation Anaconda.
Pfc. Jason Ashline, 20, of New York City, said he was struck by two bullets in the chest but survived because the rounds lodged in his bulletproof vest.
"For a couple of seconds, everything was, like, in slow-motion," Ashline said. "I was pretty scared because I didn't feel no pain. I thought, 'what's wrong?' I thought maybe I was dead."
View Quote
From [url]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/20020311/ap_on_re_as/afghan_fighting[/url]
I know that the Taliban dont normally use submachine guns or pistols. That had to be at least 7.62x39 or 5.54x39 that he was hit with.
Casualties were not light in Anaconda- some of the units that went in on the first day suffered casualties as high as 20%- its just that no one was killed! The majority of wounds also seem to have been to extremities- not covered by the vests- and while still enough to require evacuation for care did not require a hospital stay and they have since returned to their units.
I have a strong feeling that the six Special Ops guys killed on Day 1 probably had eschewed armor, since they were supposed to be going on recon missions, and that was why there were so many fatalities in that one firefight.
We had to have set some kind of record in this campaign for the low number of KIA's amongst all of our people hit... its bloody amazing. The guys at DuPont must be peeling themselves off the cealing for how well their stuff worked.