Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 4/27/2001 10:06:44 AM EST
Ok, which one will blow up on you quicker, or end up in a drive by sooner? [BD]
c-rock
[url]www.illinois-shooter.org
Link Posted: 4/27/2001 1:33:52 PM EST
[#1]
whichever one wins...my boy raven .25  here wants a shot at him.
Link Posted: 4/27/2001 2:14:17 PM EST
[#2]
Link Posted: 4/27/2001 8:12:09 PM EST
[#3]
Or which one will end up in an evidence baggie faster?

It's a draw.
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 11:33:26 AM EST
[#4]
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 11:45:31 AM EST
[#5]
i remember when i was like 10 and i told my dad look at the 9mm it is only 80 dollars. he just rolled his eyes.
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 3:37:51 PM EST
[#6]
"Ring Of Fire" baby!
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 4:57:13 PM EST
[#7]
Hey, I figure it was a good post.  
c-rock
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 5:16:15 PM EST
[#8]
Both only good for about 2 boxes of ammo! After that, throw both of them in the garbage.
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 5:35:33 PM EST
[#9]
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 5:40:28 PM EST
[#10]
I wonder how many of the "Lorcin/Jennings/RG/Bryco" bashers out there have ever really OWNED one.

I mean, it is a pretty popular game on the gun boards to use "Lorcin" as a synonym for "Junk"- and I agree. Lorcins are junk.

But i'd bet that 1/2 of all the posters on this thread, so far and posters to come, have never owned one.

I say this because I owned a FIE Titan when I was 17, and out on my own livin in a shit nieghborhood. All of my other guns were hawked, and it was all I had. Never let me down. Not even once.
Yet people still will call it "junk"....
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 6:18:50 PM EST
[#11]
what about a high-point?

at shows the 9mm cost 80 bucks and 120 with laser.......ooooooowwwww.......a laser
Link Posted: 4/28/2001 11:27:03 PM EST
[#12]
I'll never own one but they sure are fun to bash.
An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator.

If you are the system administrator please click here to find out more about this error.