Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 12/18/2010 2:49:48 PM EDT
http://www.google.com/search?complete=0&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1680&bih=963&q=Lockheed+Martin's+F-22s+Corroding,+Need+$228+Million+Repairs&btnG=Google+Search


Lockheed Martin's F-22s Corroding, Need $228 Million Repairs

By Tony Capaccio and Gopal Ratnam
Bloomberg
Dec 16, 2010

Lockheed Martin Corp.'s F-22 jets began corroding soon after introduction into the U.S. Air Force in 2005 and the Defense Department plans to spend $228 million through 2016 to fix the deteriorating aluminum skin panels, the Government Accountability Office said in a report today.


GAO REPORT
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11171r.pdf
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 2:51:25 PM EDT
[#1]
Good lord...



Between this and the F35...
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 2:54:35 PM EDT
[#2]
All this knowledge of chemistry, metallurgy, etc, etc, and all this is supposed to come

together in the most advanced airplane yet they can't make parts that don't rot sitting the parking lot?





WTF??
 
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 2:56:11 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
All this knowledge of chemistry, metallurgy, etc, etc, and they can't make parts that don't rot sitting the parking lot?

WTF??



I wondered why they all weren't parked under cover or in a hanger.
I was told I was an idiot who didn't understand.

Whoever wrote this article must similarily be an idiot questioning why a 100 Million fighter isn't parked in a 200K hanger.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 2:58:06 PM EDT
[#4]
Why can't we just coat them all in tenifer?
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 2:59:49 PM EDT
[#5]
The Navy has been flying aircraft in a corrosive environment for decades and doesn't seem to have this problem. WTF?
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:02:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Are the coatings themselves corroding the aluminum or is it some kind of galvanic reaction with a dis-similar metal?
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:05:14 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
The Navy has been flying aircraft in a corrosive environment for decades and doesn't seem to have this problem. WTF?


Wait till they start operating the F-35C.  

Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:05:43 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Are the coatings themselves corroding the aluminum or is it some kind of galvanic reaction with a dis-similar metal?


Did you read the article?      


Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:05:51 PM EDT
[#9]
Probably just an excuse or a cover up to spend more money updating it i seriously doubt they spend millions on a jet and use cheap material.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:06:33 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
All this knowledge of chemistry, metallurgy, etc, etc, and they can't make parts that don't rot sitting the parking lot?

WTF??



I wondered why they all weren't parked under cover or in a hanger.
I was told I was an idiot who didn't understand.

Whoever wrote this article must similarily be an idiot questioning why a 100 Million fighter isn't parked in a 200K hanger.


I actually clearly remember you being told you're essentially a moran in that thread.  
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:07:27 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
All this knowledge of chemistry, metallurgy, etc, etc, and they can't make parts that don't rot sitting the parking lot?

WTF??



I wondered why they all weren't parked under cover or in a hanger.
I was told I was an idiot who didn't understand.

Whoever wrote this article must similarily be an idiot questioning why a 100 Million fighter isn't parked in a 200K hanger.


You don't understand, but I don't recall you being called an idiot.

However, weather is not a factor in this case. It's the radar absorbant materials themselves causing corrosion. Wouldn't matter if it was inside a hangar or not.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:07:56 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
The Navy has been flying aircraft in a corrosive environment for decades and doesn't seem to have this problem. WTF?


It's real obvious that you have never worked on a Naval aircraft, especially ones made by Grumman.
The F-14, A-6 and EA-6B were / are corroding piles of shit.
Who uses fucking spot welds to hold their panels together on an aircraft that's going to be operated in a corrosive environment.  

Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:08:34 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Navy has been flying aircraft in a corrosive environment for decades and doesn't seem to have this problem. WTF?


Wait till they start operating the F-35C.  



Supposedly corrected in the F-35. Lesson learned from the F-22 that was applied to the F-35.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:08:40 PM EDT
[#14]



Quoted:



Quoted:

Are the coatings themselves corroding the aluminum or is it some kind of galvanic reaction with a dis-similar metal?




Did you read the article?      







It is funny to see who doesn't bother to read the articles...

 
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:11:28 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are the coatings themselves corroding the aluminum or is it some kind of galvanic reaction with a dis-similar metal?


Did you read the article?      




Yep, the one I clicked on didn't mention the actual cause but if it was the actual coatings I guessed pretty damn good. Aluminum "rusts" by creating aluminum oxide on the surface and is pretty self limiting to a certain extant unless there are some issues with the alloy itself or with galvanic reaction. And Lockheed should be responsible for the repair costs if due to poor testing of the coatings or a product defect.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:16:04 PM EDT
[#16]
can you say " low bidder "
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:20:19 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are the coatings themselves corroding the aluminum or is it some kind of galvanic reaction with a dis-similar metal?

Did you read the article?      

Yep, the one I clicked on didn't mention the actual cause but if it was the actual coatings I guessed pretty damn good. Aluminum "rusts" by creating aluminum oxide on the surface and is pretty self limiting to a certain extant unless there are some issues with the alloy itself or with galvanic reaction. And Lockheed should be responsible for the repair costs if due to poor testing of the coatings or a product defect.


The article is correct and that's all I am going to say.  


Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:24:48 PM EDT
[#18]
I wonder if the air force has ever regretted not choosing the F-23.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:30:21 PM EDT
[#19]
Time to stop giving Lockheed contracts.
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:39:13 PM EDT
[#20]



Quoted:


Time to stop giving Lockheed contracts.


Why?  We're having fairly serious corrosion issues with our 5 year old C-17s here.  They were built by McDonnell Douglas/Boeing. We have a lot of composite in the structure, and the places we are seeing issues are mostly at the composite/aluminum joins.  All metal airplanes are easy, we've been flying them for 80 years and the problems are well understood, but composites are still a young field by comparison. With all of the unique coatings and materials used on the F-22 it's no surprise they don't all perform as expected right out of the gate.  



 
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:44:04 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 3:48:05 PM EDT
[#22]



Quoted:





Quoted:




Quoted:

Time to stop giving Lockheed contracts.


Why?  We're having fairly serious corrosion issues with our 5 year old C-17s here.  They were built by McDonnell Douglas/Boeing. We have a lot of composite in the structure, and the places we are seeing issues are mostly at the composite/aluminum joins.  All metal airplanes are easy, we've been flying them for 80 years and the problems are well understood, but composites are still a young field by comparison. With all of the unique coatings and materials used on the F-22 it's no surprise they don't all perform as expected right out of the gate.  

 
This problem is not restricted to military aircraft.



 
We use the same materials as commercial aircraft, so I'm not surprised.  Wait until the 7late7 enters service, that's going to be interesting.  





 
Link Posted: 12/18/2010 5:11:09 PM EDT
[#23]
It's the cold war mentality - we're still competing with the russians







 
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top