imo, eddy merckx was, possibly, the greatest cyclist "ever". unfortunately, steroids assisted his career.
a "modern day" cyclist cannot be compared to a merckx. eddy rode, and won, almost everything, in his day. a modern tour rider is groomed only to ride the tour...to win it.
not the vuelta. not the giro. not the classics.
back "in the day" a team leader rode as many races as his health would permit...and sometimes as long as he could throw a leg over!
lance, like lemond before him, is a specialist. nonetheless, his athletic prowess ranks him as among the best ever to turn the cranks.
dolomite, after jalabert's epic solo victory in the mountains this year, we cannot bash the french too hard! lol!
never forget, the french gave us louison bobet! jacques anquetil! bernard thevenet...bernard hinault...laurant fignon...cristophe....and thousands of other great racers.
next year will be the 100th anniversaty of le tour. if lance can do 5 victories, there will be no question as to his status among the "campione del campiones".
dugster, i have pondered your question since 1972. i remember sitting tranfixed to the tv and watching a scrawny kid named george mount drive the pace in the montreal olympics road race...lap after lap, george pounded out a tatoo up that mont...with a smile on his face! back then, a yank dragging the peloton up that grade was looked upon with disbelief by canadian and european cycling. george's stars and stripes jersey was an amazing thing to see at the front of that field.
ever since that day, a mainly ignorant or uninterested american public has largely ignored the accomplishments of the last 30 years of american cyclists.
i find this very sad. afterall, if one knows the history of cycling, one would know that the united states was a cycling power in the 1890's up to about 1925.
a few of us can appreciate lance armstrong's abilities and efforts.
btw, if you see kurt harnett, tell him i said hello!