Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/22/2017 12:11:25 AM
Posted: 8/23/2005 2:26:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 8/23/2005 2:28:19 PM EDT by warlord]
I know a lot of folks don't really care about this MJ B.S., but in a bit of poetic justic.
latimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-082305accuser_lat,0,2266150.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Felony Charges Filed Against Mother of Jackson's Accuser
By Stuart Pfeifer and Christine Hanley
Times Staff Writers

2:49 PM PDT, August 23, 2005

Los Angeles County prosecutors today filed five felony charges of welfare fraud and perjury against the mother of Michael Jackson's teenage accuser, the woman whose credibility was at the center of the pop star's acquittal on child molestation charges.

Prosecutors allege that Janet Arvizo received more than $18,000 in welfare benefits illegally by failing to disclose that she and her family had received thousands of dollars in the settlement of a civil lawsuit.

Arvizo today declined to comment on the charges, according to a young man who answered the door at her Los Alamitos home.

A Santa Barbara County jury acquitted Jackson of child molestation charges in June, saying that part of the reason was that they distrusted the boy's mother.

The welfare fraud investigation forced the woman to invoke her 5th Amendment protection against self incrimination before she answered any questions on that topic.

Los Angeles County prosecutors began the investigation of Arvizo after a lawyer working for Jackson forwarded evidence of the alleged fraud. Now, Jackson is free and the mother of his accuser is facing a possible prison sentence.

"The truth has been revealed that she is the individual who should be prosecuted," said Carl A. "Tony" Capozzola, the Jackson lawyer who called on Los Angeles prosecutors to investigate the mother.

Jackson's defense attorney during the child molestation trial, Thomas Mesereau Jr., said:

"This helps confirm what we were saying through the trial, which was the accuser and his family lacked credibility and that the charges were false. It was a disgrace for the prosecutor to go forward with this case against Michael Jackson."

Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times

partners: KTLA Hoy
Link Posted: 8/23/2005 2:38:54 PM EDT
He's still a wacko
Link Posted: 8/23/2005 4:26:03 PM EDT
She was the wacko in this case. What a douchebag.
Link Posted: 8/23/2005 4:33:53 PM EDT
They're both nutcases.



Vulcan94
Top Top