User Panel
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I tried to take a different approach with my letter to the BATFE. As opposed to making arguments that the round is no more deadly to law enforcement than say M193 etc, I decided to identify the holes in the law itself and show that M855 does NOT satisfy either subsections of 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(B). Let me know if you guys think I make a good case and/or if my logic is sound. (Click each image to enlarge) https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/t31.0-8/10869354_10152850172283800_8904894484852500753_o.jpg https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/t31.0-8/10506729_10152850172303800_1388279879232538459_o.jpg https://scontent-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t31.0-8/10985329_10152850172158800_2926380304156888109_o.jpg FNC assault rifle? How about "FNC rifle"... Because it was originally designed for use in the FNC Assault Rifle...not the neutered semiauto version that was imported to the U.S. Exactly. Thank you, cms81586. |
|
|
|
So there is nothing that we can do about this? Everyone here is just scrambling to buy as much as they can before it's banned?
|
|
Quoted:
So there is nothing that we can do about this? Everyone here is just scrambling to buy as much as they can before it's banned? View Quote Buy more. Also call your Congressmen and submit a comment to the BATFE (yeah, I know, they don't care. It will help us in Congress and the Courts). |
|
Quoted:
So there is nothing that we can do about this? Everyone here is just scrambling to buy as much as they can before it's banned? View Quote We can do exactly the same thing we did in early 2013. Blow up phones & faxes. Fill mailboxes. We're showing the ATF that they can't sneak this shit under the radar and we're getting our congresscritters on it. It's becoming a national thing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Rush Limbaugh is now talking about this. YEAH! He's doing a good job of it too. Oh yeah.. really laying out the political/underhanded FBHO aspects behind the ATF's action. That will piss off a lot of people that aren't even gun people... maybe even Fudds. |
|
Article on Drudge today highlighted in red:
Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2560750 |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Rush Limbaugh is now talking about this. YEAH! He's doing a good job of it too. He did a good job there of telling that caller saying "they can't ban ammo" that he's wrong. That caller apparently hasn't heard about 7N6. |
|
It use to be mostly just people active on gun related sites that were buying up M855. The vast majority of shooters remained oblivious.
Now pretty much every person with an a 5.56 weapon is going to be looking to buy M855 (whether they even know what it is or not). |
|
Quoted:
If you guys thought the panic buying was bad before... View Quote 81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 |
|
Quoted:
81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If you guys thought the panic buying was bad before... 81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 Buy it and send the seller a Bag O' Dicks, courtesy of SKD for payment |
|
Quoted:
Buy it and send the seller a Bag O' Dicks, courtesy of SKD for payment View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you guys thought the panic buying was bad before... 81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 Buy it and send the seller a Bag O' Dicks, courtesy of SKD for payment Someone already bought it. |
|
I tried to send the ATF my comments via that SAVEM855.COM web site but it refuses to accept it. The page keeps screaming I need to put my name and address in the message regardless of how many times I put my name and address in the message.
Is there another way I can send my comments to the ATF? It probably won't do anything, but at least I can say I did something. |
|
Selling on Gunbroker for $.81 cents a round right now, I bet we see $2 a round for 855 within a couple months. XM193 will also get hoarded like 22LR now. This is a bad deal.
|
|
Quoted:
So there is nothing that we can do about this? Everyone here is just scrambling to buy as much as they can before it's banned? View Quote Have you not seen the dozens of threads about responding? Here is one http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1718217_Take_Action__Proposed_ATF_ban_on_M855_____How_to_respond.html&page=1 I have emailed Congress dudes. Still working on my ATF response. |
|
Quoted:
I tried to send the ATF my comments via that SAVEM855.COM web site but it refuses to accept it. The page keeps screaming I need to put my name and address in the message regardless of how many times I put my name and address in the message. Is there another way I can send my comments to the ATF? It probably won't do anything, but at least I can say I did something. View Quote Last page of the proposal ATF will carefully consider all comments, as appropriate, received on or before March 16, 2015, and will give comments received after that date the same consideration if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration cannot be given except as to comments received on or before March 16, 2015. ATF will not acknowledge receipt of comments. Submit comments in any of three ways (but do not submit the same comments multiple times or by more than one method): ? ATF website: [email protected]. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. ? Fax: (202) 648-9741. ? Mail: Denise Brown, Mailstop 6N-602, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20226: ATTN: AP Ammo Comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7070. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you guys thought the panic buying was bad before... 81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 Buy it and send the seller a Bag O' Dicks, courtesy of SKD for payment Someone already bought it. Now is not the time to panic buy bags of dicks. |
|
You should be panicking. The fudds should panic. The handgun guys should panic. Last time someone from the govt. wants to take away your right (whether arbitrarily or not) you should panic. |
|
TexasRifleMan, did you dissect and weigh a SS109/M855 bullet as seen earlier in the thread?
The 10.8 grains (grams?) for the jacket differs from a value of 19.8 gr that I have seen. |
|
Quoted:
Now is not the time to panic buy bags of dicks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you guys thought the panic buying was bad before... 81 cents a round shipped five minutes ago: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=470367245 Buy it and send the seller a Bag O' Dicks, courtesy of SKD for payment Someone already bought it. Now is not the time to panic buy bags of dicks. There is a can with a $450 reserve with a bid. $1.00 per round |
|
Quoted:
TexasRifleMan, did you dissect and weigh a SS109/M855 bullet as seen earlier in the thread? The 10.8 grains (grams?) for the jacket differs from a value of 19.8 gr that I have seen. View Quote Yes, I dissected it. The correct weight for that particular projectiles jacket was 20.3 grains. But some folks flipped out and asked I not give any ideas to our opponents who are doubtlessly reading this. Now everyone is posting numbers so whatever, it's out of my hands. Crucify me if you want, I didn't want to give the other side ideas, once that was pointed out to me. Counter arguments: 1) The common definition of ".22 caliber" has always included .222-.224" guns. 2) For a projectile to be "full jacketed" it would have to be base enclosed. 3) M855 was not "designed and intended" to be fired from a handgun. For the record, pretty much all .224 FMJs seem to have jacket percentages above 25%. Don't believe me, obviously, test it yourself. An attack on that front is coming eventually, I believe. |
|
Quoted:
Crucify me if you want, I didn't want to give the other side ideas, once that was pointed out to me. View Quote I just want the truth. Too many people are using the 10.8 gr value to incorrectly tell the ATF that the jacket is under 25% of the bullet weight. That does not help. Since this projectile is still 22 caliber part (ii) does not make it armor piercing. Part (i) does not make it armor piercing since the core is not close to 100% steel (or other bad material). Thanks for the clarification. I will use the 19.8 gr value I saw in another document. The federal statutory definition of "Armor Piercing Ammunition" (see 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(17)(B).16) is: (i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed ENTIRELY (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper or depleted uranium; or (ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile. |
|
Quoted:
I just want the truth. Too many people are using the 10.8 gr value to incorrectly tell the ATF that the jacket is under 25% of the bullet weight. That does not help. Since this projectile is still 22 caliber part (ii) still not not make it armor piercing. Part (i) does not make it armor piercing since the core is not close to 100% steel (or other bad material). Thanks for the clarification. I will use the 19.8 gr value I saw in another document. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Crucify me if you want, I didn't want to give the other side ideas, once that was pointed out to me. I just want the truth. Too many people are using the 10.8 gr value to incorrectly tell the ATF that the jacket is under 25% of the bullet weight. That does not help. Since this projectile is still 22 caliber part (ii) still not not make it armor piercing. Part (i) does not make it armor piercing since the core is not close to 100% steel (or other bad material). Thanks for the clarification. I will use the 19.8 gr value I saw in another document. Would you like me to go back and reedit those comments at this point? Caution seemed warranted at the time, my apologies for the unexpected problems. |
|
Quoted:
If we do not stop this, eventually this will be the only BATFE approved civilian 556/223 round http://www.ammo-one.com/5-56BLANK-X.jpg View Quote Yeah and EPA will ban that because....environment. |
|
It would be difficult to edit past weights. At this point people can use the correct value of about 19.8 gr. All that matters now is that the jacket is over 25% of the projectile weight but since it is NOT larger than .22 caliber, that means that you can't use that percentage to label M855 as armor piercing.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I tried to send the ATF my comments via that SAVEM855.COM web site but it refuses to accept it. The page keeps screaming I need to put my name and address in the message regardless of how many times I put my name and address in the message. Is there another way I can send my comments to the ATF? It probably won't do anything, but at least I can say I did something. View Quote E-mail. [email protected]. |
|
Quoted:
It would be difficult to edit past weights. At this point people can use the correct value of about 19.8 gr. All that matters now is that the jacket is over 25% of the projectile weight but since it is NOT larger than .22 caliber, that means that you can't use that percentage to label M855 as armor piercing. View Quote 18 U.S. Code § 921 (a) 17 (B) (ii) also has "designed and intended for use in a handgun" and "fully jacketed" as qualifiers. To argue M855 was "designed and intended for use in a handgun" is nothing short of insane. |
|
480 rnds XM855 steel core armor piercing 223 5.56 AR15 AR soon discontinued ss109 green tip ammo Auction # 470374113 This item has been Sold! Click to view 480 rnds XM855 steel core armor piercing 223 5.56 Add this item to your watch list Show description Current Bid $449.00 Reserve Met! Started at $0.01 Buy Now! Price was $500.00 Quantity 1 # of bids 8 Bid History Time left Listing has Ended 15 minute rule Location Edgerton, WI 53534-8777 Start 2/25/2015 2:19:01 PM ET (This is a 1 day auction) Ends On or After 2/26/2015 2:41:41 PM ET (GunBroker.com Official Time) Seller docholidy1971 A+(155) View the feedback of this seller | View seller's other auctions | Add seller to Favorite Sellers List | Ask seller a question Winning Bidder cougarengine A+(3) Add this auction to your watch list Add this listing to your watch list mail auction to a friend Mail this listing to a friend Add this listing to my calendar Add this listing to my calendar More Sharing Services Share | Share on facebook Share on myspace Share on google Share on twitter Payment Methods USPS Money Order Sales Tax Seller does not collect sales tax Shipping Ground: $30.00 No international shipments. See Item Description. Inspection Period / Return Policy Unspecified Item Condition New Old Stock Requires FFL? No Seller Tools Use our Tools for Sellers page to modify this listing, add to the description, close this auction, relist this item, submit feedback, and otherwise manage your listings. Useful links: End this Auction | Problem with a Buyer? | Non Paying Bidder Report | View the Winning Bidder's name and address Winning Bidder Tools View the Seller's name and address | Problem with the Seller? The seller of this item assumes all responsibility for this listing. You must contact the seller to resolve any questions or concerns before placing a bid. Payment must be made using U.S. dollars ($) unless otherwise stated in the listing. Firearms may only be shipped to a licensed dealer (FFL Holder). Some listed items may not be legal in every state. Click here for details on how to complete your purchase within the law. This auction has ended This page is only available for a limited time. Please print or save a copy for your records. |
|
|
Quoted:
18 U.S. Code § 921 (a) 17 (B) (ii) also has "designed and intended for use in a handgun" and "fully jacketed" as qualifiers. To argue M855 was "designed and intended for use in a handgun" is nothing short of insane. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It would be difficult to edit past weights. At this point people can use the correct value of about 19.8 gr. All that matters now is that the jacket is over 25% of the projectile weight but since it is NOT larger than .22 caliber, that means that you can't use that percentage to label M855 as armor piercing. 18 U.S. Code § 921 (a) 17 (B) (ii) also has "designed and intended for use in a handgun" and "fully jacketed" as qualifiers. To argue M855 was "designed and intended for use in a handgun" is nothing short of insane. If shouldering a pistol with sig brace "redesigns" it as a SBR then the ATF is actually being consistent with their "logic" here. |
|
Quoted: BATFE: Where they ignore select words in the law so that a few grains that don't matter suddenly become a Big Fucking Deal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: ARFcom GD....where people argue over 0.50 grains of weight. BATFE: Where they ignore select words in the law so that a few grains that don't matter suddenly become a Big Fucking Deal. |
|
Quoted:
If shouldering a pistol with sig brace "redesigns" it as a SBR then the ATF is actually being consistent with their "logic" here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It would be difficult to edit past weights. At this point people can use the correct value of about 19.8 gr. All that matters now is that the jacket is over 25% of the projectile weight but since it is NOT larger than .22 caliber, that means that you can't use that percentage to label M855 as armor piercing. 18 U.S. Code § 921 (a) 17 (B) (ii) also has "designed and intended for use in a handgun" and "fully jacketed" as qualifiers. To argue M855 was "designed and intended for use in a handgun" is nothing short of insane. If shouldering a pistol with sig brace "redesigns" it as a SBR then the ATF is actually being consistent with their "logic" here. ... Yup... Hence the concern. They will try to use this angle, I'm sure of it. Maybe a year down the road, but it's not much more creative than the current reinterpretation. |
|
|
Quoted:
No the question is 10.8 vs. 19.8/20.3 10 to 10.5 grains. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
ARFcom GD....where people argue over 0.50 grains of weight. No the question is 10.8 vs. 19.8/20.3 10 to 10.5 grains. Bottom line: do not argue that the jacket percentage is under 25% of the projectile weight. Use the 22 caliber and not designed for a handgun TRUTH as written a few posts above. |
|
Another link made news below.
http://www.news-leader.com/story/news/local/ozarks/2015/02/21/ban-armor-piercing-bullets/23816437/ |
|
I will sell every round of 5.56 I have for $1 a round. Seriously.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.