Article by Yashiko Sagamori, Candidate for Secretary of
   State of California

            Yashiko Sagamori 6 nov 2002

   Have you ever thought that, in the unfolding conflict between the
Muslim world and the
   civilization, the Muslims behave much more logically than the West?

   If I believe that you are unlawfully occupying, let's say, an island
that's rightfully mine, I will send
   troops to that island. Their purpose will be to suppress any
military resistance your army can
   offer, and re-establish my ownership over that piece of land. There
is absolutely no need for
   me to target civilians in such a conflict: from any prospective, it
would be not just immoral, but
   totally counterproductive vis-a-vis my goals in the conflict.

   Jihad however is not about territories. It is about a way of life.
If I wanted to destroy your way of
   life, going after your military installations would be largely
futile, especially if your military might
   is a billion times greater than anything I can ever dream of. Your
army, no matter how
   powerful, is only a tiny portion of your way of life. Blowing up an
office building full of so called
   "innocent civilians" advances my cause much farther and much more
convincingly (especially
   if it causes you to engage in soul-searching instead of
exterminating me once and forever
   which you are perfectly capable of accomplishing) than killing the
same number of military
   personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important,
irreplaceable components
   of the way of life I am trying to destroy. Their "innocence" is
non-existent. The term is nothing
   but an absurd euphemism for their absurd inability to defend
themselves. Think about it: how
   can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in
terms?

   If you think I am being sarcastic, read the previous paragraph
again: I am only trying to explain
   how the enemy's mentality is better suited for the conflict than
ours.

   During WWII, when the very survival of our civilization was in
question (although not as acutely
   as it is now), the United States treated enemy civilians in a more
reasonable manner than our
   current impotent, defeatist morality dictates. Hiroshima and
Nagasaki were destroyed along
   with most of their 100% civilian population despite the fact that
they had not a single military
   installation in either of them. As a result, Japan surrendered. As a
result, lives of about a
   million American soldiers were spared, along with probably four or
five times that many
   Japanese, most of them civilians. Conclusion: Japan should not have
put the United States in
   a position where even humanitarian gestures would be so murderous
for the Japanese.

   In recent times, Israel is being daily penalized for killing
Palestinian "civilians". Nothing can be
   more absurd, considering that "Palestinian people" didn't even exist
until after the Six Day War,
   when that shameful misnomer was assigned to the largest and most
successful terrorist
   organization in history. An Arab on the way to glorious martyrdom
remains an unarmed
   civilian until he or she straps the explosives to his or her body.
People who organize terrorist
   acts are considered unarmed civilians until their affiliation with a
terrorist organization is
   proven, preferably in court. Women that lured 13 Israeli soldiers
into a murderous trap in Jenin
   were perfectly unarmed civilians. Louis Farrakhan and his army are
considered unarmed
   civilians. Mosques, those foreposts of Jihad spread around the
United States and Europe, are
   considered off limits as religious institutions.

   By the way, a religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most
probably cause wide
   spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However,
the religious cult that
   demands human sacrifices on the global scale -- conversion,
enslavement, or extermination of
   all "infidel" everywhere in the world -- is respectfully classified
as a "monotheistic religion" and
   "Abrahamic faith". In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily
disguised as a saint.

   We are doomed to destruction unless we start treating Islam the way
we did Nazism. I am not
   calling for an anti-Muslim genocide: our decisive victory in WWII
was achieved without
   exterminating the Germans. Instead, we exterminated Nazism. Today,
we have no choice but
   to exterminate the most murderous ideology that has ever existed --
Islam.

   I see many parallels between today's world and the situation at the
beginning of WWII. With the
   sole exception of Great Britain, not a single government tried to
oppose Hitler. If Hitler had not
   betrayed Stalin, the Soviet Union would've had no reason to oppose
him either. Contrary to
   the popular myth, the United States did not enter the war to stop
the Holocaust: they did it to
   prevent Stalin from going all the way to the Channel and creating
the European Union a few
   decades prematurely.

   Today, Muslims invade civilized countries under the benign guise of
immigration. Their
   influence in Europe and even in the United States is growing
steadily and will continue to do so
   unopposed until we finally wake up, although it's hard to tell if
we're ever going to do it in time
   to save ourselves. Hypnotized by our own impotent dogmas, we
stubbornly refuse to
   recognize the never-ending Arab was against Israel, the September
11, the war in Chechnya,
   the terrorist acts in various parts of the world for what they are:
individual fronts of steadily
   growing Jihad, whose openly stated purpose is to destroy our
civilization and establish the rule
   that would make Taliban look helplessly liberal. So far, they are
winning.

Until this sagamori character apologizes for what happened in Nanking and the Bataan Death March and pays reparations the whole statement is moot.

AGREED

Hate to break the news, but Sagamori is an AMERICAN who grew up in California! Why should he apologize for something the Japs did? Do you expect Americans of European descent to apologize for the NAZIs? How about Imperialism by Brits, Frogs, Spanish, Portugese and Belgians?

It's actually a damned good article if you read it closely, especially the 3rd paragraph. Shows why we need to brush the whining liberals aside and start exterminating those who wage jihad.

Amazing how quickly some people have a knee-jerk reaction based on a person's last name, without paying due diligence and discovering who the author is before they sling their arrows.

I agree with what the author is saying.  I'm getting sick and tired of hearing the sanctimoneous BS "Islam is Peace" all the time from our own government.

Radical Islam is our enemy.  Muslims who support terrorists are our enemy.  We have 3 choices:

1 - Continue to do what we're doing, and continue to suffer and get caught with our pants down occasionally (9/11) and end up losing all of OUR rights.

2 - Wage a war of eradication, and let the chips fall where they may.

3 - Reduce our dependence on Middle Eastern oil (open up ANWAR, help Russia with their production, Venezuela, etc.) as well as finding alternate sources.


You'd think that we would go for route #3, but I'm cynical and know it will be more of #1.  God forbid we ever had someone in office who had the sack to take route #2 (my personal favorite).

Imbroglio does that. Many have been trying to help him understand, so far without success.

Now we know there's at least one politician in California with a firm grip on reality.