Quoted:
Quoted:
The courts presume as a matter of law that where a child is born to a married couple ..., paternity attaches.
View Quote
This is the law in most places, and has been for a long time. You dont have to prove that a child born to your wife is your child, nor does a wife have to prove a child is her husband's.
View Quote
True. Several years back there was a case in I believe PRK where the real father was not permitted visitation in spite of DNA testing, because the woman was married to another at the time of birth or conception, I forget which, and the husband was determined to be the legal father, even though he wasn't the biological one. The biological one did not get visitation to his own kid.
Also, last year a guy here was convicted of murdering his wife. The motive, according to the prosecution, was that he had a son with his wife (or so he thought), who he had raised
with her from infancy to the age of 23. In reality, his wife had been spreading her legs for a "family friend" and the 23-year old was fathered by that guy. The wife had intended to tell the boy after all this time that his gfather was really someone else, and the prosecutors presented that as a motive.
So even after he got past the infidelity, the husband evidently couldn't stand to see his son get hurt & used by the bitc*, or at least that was the theory.