User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 12:40:06 PM EDT
[#1]
Internal extractor is preferable.
External Extractors - 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 12:49:41 PM EDT
[#2]
Internal. They are alot easier to replace in the field if something goes wrong.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:04:26 PM EDT
[#3]
I'd stick with an internal one, for parts availability and because most big 'smiths are more familiar with them if you decide to have it tweaked later. If you're really paranoid, send it off to Wilson or someone to have a better extractor fitted... and then proceed to never worry about it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:05:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Been ok since 1911. No reason to change.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:15:02 PM EDT
[#5]
Definitely not. Companies went to the external extractor because they don't have to be tuned (read: cheaper to produce). On the other hand, when it quits working, the external extractor is much more difficult to replace in the field.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:19:25 PM EDT
[#6]
Just get a G21.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:40:11 PM EDT
[#7]
 I'm done with tupperware 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:41:27 PM EDT
[#8]
best improvement for a 1911: buying a beretta!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:50:55 PM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 1:51:54 PM EDT
[#10]
Now your account is definitely going to be locked
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:02:21 PM EDT
[#11]
Yep. JMB deemed that the 1911 would have an internal, and it was so. Don't mess with a good design. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:02:51 PM EDT
[#12]
a big +1 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:03:46 PM EDT
[#13]
good god man what are you on? 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:06:19 PM EDT
[#14]
Actually...JMB originally designed the 1911 with an external extractor. It was the Army who requested him to modify the design for an internal extractor as they belived it would provide for easier field-stripping and maintenance. In reality, JMB deemed that the 1911 would have an external. 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:07:14 PM EDT
[#15]
So you're interested in stovepipe jams instead?
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:50:37 PM EDT
[#16]
 I bet he is more interested in not having his hand amputated. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:52:31 PM EDT
[#17]
Yeah, or a USP.  Either way badass to the mucho. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:56:28 PM EDT
[#18]
no, just more pro-fesh-un-ul |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 2:59:37 PM EDT
[#19]
internals are preferable, that said the new externals seems to have few problems.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:00:14 PM EDT
[#20]
AGNTSA!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:01:52 PM EDT
[#21]
Pro-fesh-un-ul to the mucho. 
|
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:02:55 PM EDT
[#22]
Then he realized he should have made it external and designed the GP1935 (Browning High Power). |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:03:10 PM EDT
[#23]
Very pro-fesh-ul-nul 
|
||||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:03:44 PM EDT
[#24]
Haha, actually, I prefer steel to plastic... the reason I have metal bumpers on my truck and not a VW
|
||||
|
|
|
Posted: 3/4/2006 3:05:51 PM EDT
[#25]
The best request the Army has ever made.
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
