Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 12/18/2005 6:45:18 AM EDT

Iraq vote leaves Dems looking like the losers

December 18, 2005

BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Link

Well, that old Iraqi quagmire just keeps getting worse and worse, if only for the Democratic Party. What was the straw they were clutching at back in January? Oh, yeah, sure, gazillions of Kurds and Shiites might have gone to the polls, but where were the Sunni? As some of us said at the time, the Sunni'll come out tomorrow. And so they did. On Thursday, they voted in record numbers, leaving Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats frantically scrambling for another disaffected Iraqi minority group they could use as proof that the whole crazy neocon war-for-oil scam was a bust.



Unfortunately, there don't seem to be any disaffected Iraqi minority groups left. Oh, wait, there's Ahmed at 37 Sword of the Infidel Slayer Gardens in Ramadi. Apparently, he's still rejecting the new constitution. Maybe, if we're lucky, he's got a brother who's mildly irked. Whoops, sorry, they just went off to vote, too.

Heigh-ho. The Iraq election's over, the media did their best to ignore it, and, judging from the rippling torsos I saw every time I switched on the TV, the press seem to reckon that that gay cowboy movie was the big geopolitical event of the last week, if not of all time. Yes, yes, I know: They're not, technically, cowboys, they're gay shepherds, but even Hollywood isn't crazy enough to think it can sell gay shepherds to the world. And the point is, even if I was in the mood for a story about two rugged insecure men who find themselves strangely attracted to each other in a dark transgressive relationship that breaks all the rules, who needs Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger when you've got Howard Dean and Abu Musad al-Zarqawi? Yee-haw! And, if that sounds unfair, pick almost any recent statement by a big-time Dem cowboy and tell me how exactly it would differ from the pep talks Zarqawi gives his dwindling band of head-hackers -- Dean arguing that America can't win in Iraq, Barbara Boxer demanding the troops begin withdrawing on Dec. 15, John Kerry accusing American soldiers of terrorizing Iraqi women and children, Jack Murtha declaring that the U.S. Army is utterly broken. Pepper 'em with a handful of "Praise be to Allahs" and any one of those statements could have been uttered by Zarqawi.

The Democratic Party have contrived to get themselves into a situation where bad news from Iraq is good for them and good news from Iraq is bad for them. And as there's a lot more good news than bad these days, that puts them, politically, in a tough spot -- even with a fawning media that, faced with Kerry and Murtha talking what in any objective sense is drivel, decline to call for the men with white coats but instead nod solemnly and wonder whether Bush is living "in a bubble."

One day Iraq will be a G7 member hosting the Olympics in the world's No. 1 luxury vacation resort of Fallujah, and the Defeaticrat Party will still be running around screaming it's a quagmire. It's not just that Iraq is going better than expected, but that it's a huge success that's being very deftly managed: The timeframe imposed on the democratic process turns out to have worked very well -- the transfer of sovereignty, the vote on a constitutional assembly, the ratification of the constitution, the vote for a legislature -- and, with the benefit of hindsight, it now looks like an ingeniously constructed way to bring the various parties on board in the right order: first the Kurds, then the Shia, now the Sunni. That doesn't leave many folks over on the other side except Zarqawi and Dean. What do the two have in common? They're both foreigners, neither of whom have the slightest interest in the Iraqi people.

And no, I'm not questioning their patriotism. Honestly, who can be bothered questioning anything so footling as Howard Dean's patriotism? If you're a Democratic patriot and you're outraged by my linking your party to the "insurgents," take it up with your leaders: They're the ones who've over-invested the party in American failure. And instead of being angry at me you should be ashamed of them. Your party is regarded as unserious on national security because it got it wrong last time round, when Kerry spent the last half of the Cold War siding with every loser on the planet -- opposing the liberation of Grenada, supporting the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. And at least that little Sandinista guy looked awful cute in his fatigues, like a novelty houseboy Teresa picked up on vacation. It's hard to believe a bunch of crazy mullahs and suicide bombers are going to do much for the lefty T-shirt business.

George Clooney, the matinee idol, made an interesting point the other day. He said that "liberal" had become a dirty word and he'd like to change that. Fair enough. So I hope he won't mind if I make a suggestion. The best way to reclaim "liberal" for the angels is to get on the right side of history -- the side the Iraqi people are on. The word "liberal" has no meaning if those who wear the label refuse to celebrate the birth of a new democracy after 40 years of tyranny. Yet, if you wandered the Internet on Thursday, you came across far too many "liberals" who watched the election, shrugged and went straight back to Valerie Plame, WMD, Bush lied.

Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. That's what this is about: Millions of Kurds, Shia and Sunnis beaming as they emerge from polling stations and hold up their purple fingers after the freest, fairest election ever held in the Arab world. "Liberal" in the American sense is a dirty word because it's come to stand for a shriveled parochial obsolescent irrelevance, of which ''Good Night, and Good Luck,'' Clooney's dreary little retread of the McCarthy years, is merely the latest example. (Clooney says he wants more journalists to "speak truth to power," which is why I'm insulting his movie.)

The Anglo-American political tradition is the most successful in the world in part because of the concept of "loyal opposition." Yes, the party out of office opposes the party in office and hopes to supplant it, but not at the expense of the broader political culture. A party that winds up cheerleading for a deranged loser death cult is the very definition of pointless self-defeating sour oppositionism. So, as Zarqawi flails, Dean and Murtha and Kerry flail ever more pathetically, too. Just wait till the WMD turn up.

© Mark Steyn, 2005

Copyright © Mark Steyn, 2005

Link Posted: 12/18/2005 6:49:29 AM EDT

Originally Posted By TacticalStrat:

"One day Iraq will be a G7 member hosting the Olympics in the world's No. 1 luxury vacation resort of Fallujah, and the Defeaticrat Party will still be running around screaming it's a quagmire."

Copyright © Mark Steyn, 2005




... So true
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 6:49:46 AM EDT

Originally Posted By TacticalStrat:

Iraq vote leaves Dems looking like the losers THAT THEY ARE

Link Posted: 12/18/2005 7:58:52 AM EDT
Yep, the MSM wont broadcast this at all.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:07:55 AM EDT
Amen
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:16:23 AM EDT
Funny how the news isn't covering this MAJOR EVENT of a war they can't seem to cover enough.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:17:38 AM EDT

The Party of "Tax and Spend"?
The Party of supporting "oppressed minorities"?
The Party of the "Gay Right Movement"?
The Party of the "ACLU"
THE PARTY OF "CUT AND RUN"?

No my friend, they lost their way a long, long time ago.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 4:06:25 PM EDT

Originally Posted By TacticalStrat:
Iraq vote leaves Dems looking like the losers

December 18, 2005

BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST


Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers. .....



© Mark Steyn, 2005

Copyright © Mark Steyn, 2005




My new sig line.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 4:11:13 PM EDT

even if I was in the mood for a story about two rugged insecure men who find themselves strangely attracted to each other in a dark transgressive relationship that breaks all the rules, who needs Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger when you've got Howard Dean and Abu Musad al-Zarqawi?


awesome
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:11:46 PM EDT
bump.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:16:21 PM EDT

Originally Posted By JohnnyP:
The Party of "Tax and Spend"?
The Party of supporting "oppressed minorities"?
The Party of the "Gay Right Movement"?
The Party of the "ACLU"
THE PARTY OF "CUT AND RUN"?

No my friend, they lost their way a long, long time ago.



As it was explained to me when I was 18 and first registered to vote, their party symbol is a "Jackass." That kinda stuck in my mind and explained a lot about the differences in the partys.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:18:40 PM EDT
That I enjoyed.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:26:15 PM EDT

Originally Posted By TacticalStrat:
Iraq vote leaves Dems looking like the losers

December 18, 2005

BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Link


© Mark Steyn, 2005

Copyright © Mark Steyn, 2005




I like this guys thought process
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:27:15 PM EDT
Well, written. I like it!
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:45:21 PM EDT
Outstanding. Not only does it eloquently state the reasons for my recent departure from the Democratic party, it taught me a new word:


foo·tle (rhymes with "doodle") Informal
intr.v. foo·tled, foo·tling, foo·tles
To waste time; trifle.
To talk nonsense.

n.
Nonsense; foolishness.

Link Posted: 12/18/2005 8:55:58 PM EDT
Wow. That's almost Coulter-esque!

Nicely done!
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 9:05:49 PM EDT
Mark Steyn ROCKS Check out his columns at Steynonline.com
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 9:09:28 PM EDT

Originally Posted By raven:

even if I was in the mood for a story about two rugged insecure men who find themselves strangely attracted to each other in a dark transgressive relationship that breaks all the rules, who needs Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger when you've got Howard Dean and Abu Musad al-Zarqawi?


awesome



+1

Thats one of the best quotes i've heard in a while.
Link Posted: 12/18/2005 9:16:07 PM EDT
oops wrong website, Mark Steyn is at marksteyn.com
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 2:05:12 AM EDT
The Democraps keep losing elections so they are against spreading democracy.
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 2:25:57 AM EDT
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 5:34:22 AM EDT
Very good.
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 5:47:12 AM EDT
Good stuff
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 5:53:58 AM EDT
Tagged...for excellent content!
Link Posted: 12/19/2005 6:46:55 AM EDT
Bump
Top Top