Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 10/23/2016 10:40:56 AM EDT
We already have confirmation that the Democrats bus around mass amounts of people to vote at multiple precincts and states. And no one bats an eye.

What about the voting machines? How likely/easy is it for them to just create their own results out of thin air? I'm sure a Hillary-supporting company owns all the machines. This is why we need a paper trail.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 10:42:28 AM EDT
[#1]
Early voting, which will have less eyes monitoring and voting on the spot with ID, that's why Dems want everyone to be able to get ID, including illegals and felons.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 12:57:34 PM EDT
[#2]
The media:  look at the slant that nearly every news outlet puts on the things Trump says or the things they say about Trump versus Klinton.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 1:00:43 PM EDT
[#3]
Honestly, she just needs Virginia. Pretty much ever other swing state can go red and she still wins.



For reference, look at the 2000 and 2004 electoral maps.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 1:13:18 PM EDT
[#4]
I remember when Idiot Al Franken was first elected to the senate in MN. It was a close election that called for a recount. Somehow , someone just "happened" to find some ballots in the trunk of a car that had been overlooked. Of course they were from a district that leaned  heavily democratic and it was enough to put Franken over the top. Expect lots of shenanigans like that.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 1:42:28 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I remember when Idiot Al Franken was first elected to the senate in MN. It was a close election that called for a recount. Somehow, someone just "happened" to find some ballots in the trunk of a car that had been overlooked. Of course they were from a district that leaned  heavily democratic and it was enough to put Franken over the top. Expect lots of shenanigans like that.  
View Quote



I saw one article that said it would only take about 25,000 votes manufactured like that, spread nationwide in close election districts to swing several states.  A few hundred here and a few hundred there, pretty soon you've got a whole state moved your way.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 1:48:50 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



I saw one article that said it would only take about 25,000 votes manufactured like that, spread nationwide in close election districts to swing several states.  A few hundred here and a few hundred there, pretty soon you've got a whole state moved your way.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I remember when Idiot Al Franken was first elected to the senate in MN. It was a close election that called for a recount. Somehow, someone just "happened" to find some ballots in the trunk of a car that had been overlooked. Of course they were from a district that leaned  heavily democratic and it was enough to put Franken over the top. Expect lots of shenanigans like that.  



I saw one article that said it would only take about 25,000 votes manufactured like that, spread nationwide in close election districts to swing several states.  A few hundred here and a few hundred there, pretty soon you've got a whole state moved your way.


As I recall it said 250,000 votes which was less then one percent..
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 1:52:58 PM EDT
[#7]

The DNC, state election commissions and local election boards in heavily Democrat states and jurisdictions.
Election results are entirely dependent on whoever counts and verifies the votes.

And then there's the Electoral College. Lots of potential for influence there.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 2:18:13 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
We already have confirmation that the Democrats bus around mass amounts of people to vote at multiple precincts and states. And no one bats an eye.

What about the voting machines? How likely/easy is it for them to just create their own results out of thin air? I'm sure a Hillary-supporting company owns all the machines. This is why we need a paper trail.
View Quote


Paper trail isn't going to help.

They need physical voting locations, with finger ink, that require ID that either isn't issued to illegals or which clearly distinguishes non-citizens.


The biggest single voting fraud tactic is registering people to vote automatically when they get driver's licenses, and then allowing illegals to get them.

The next biggest fraud is weighting congressional districts by including illegals in the population totals.


The first is treason, but both pretty much tear up the Constitution and piss on it.
Link Posted: 10/23/2016 2:27:38 PM EDT
[#9]
Getting her friend to run as her opponent.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top