Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 1/23/2006 2:59:06 AM EDT
Would he have accepted OBL's truece and group hugged AQ?



Why of course
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:07:44 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:11:22 AM EDT
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:13:10 AM EDT
We would be in real trouble
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:15:46 AM EDT
I would slit YOUR wrist out of mercy.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:17:32 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:18:47 AM EDT
Who is John Kerry?



Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:26:27 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



I hope you are only joking right?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:42:37 AM EDT
[sKerry]He wants a truce! This is real progress! Let's negotiate with him![/sKerry]

Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:45:22 AM EDT
Yes he most likely would.



Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:45:48 AM EDT

Originally Posted By johndel:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



I hope you are only joking right?



I really hope so.

The John Kerry you heard during the Presidential elections was a fraud. His real history could be found in his senate voting record, the company he keeps, and his own words (before he was in a Presidential race)

He was the single most liberal senator over the past 20 years.

I don't agree with everything President Bush is doing or hasn't done, but all things considered, is difficult to even make a comparison between him and kerry.

Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:47:00 AM EDT
"IF John Kerry were President"

GOD HELP US!!!!!!!!!!!!
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:47:31 AM EDT

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:
Who is John Kerry?




Given his total inability to maintain a consistent position within the few short months of the campaign, I doubt even John Kerry knows who John Kerry is.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:47:37 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 3:57:45 AM EDT
We would of surrendered.

Max
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:12:18 AM EDT

Originally Posted By maxell27:
We would of surrendered.

Max



HE would have surrendered. He also would have been impeached by now and removed from office.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:18:03 AM EDT

Originally Posted By NeedMoreAmmo:

Originally Posted By maxell27:
We would of surrendered.

Max



HE would have surrendered. He also would have been impeached by now and removed from office.



Good point. I stand corrected.

Max
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:22:38 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:28:22 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:29:28 AM EDT

Originally Posted By 82ndAbn:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



Liberal! Hippy! America hater! Communist! Terrorist Apologist!



You forgot Socialist. How could you forget Socialist.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:30:15 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



Ummmm.....how?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:34:04 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Sylvan:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.


Would you care to list the ways?
Border?
Taxes?
War on Terror?
Energy Policy?
Health Care?
Welfare?
Social Security?

In which ways, speciifically, would Kerry be doing a better job?



Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:35:00 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:37:10 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By Sylvan:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.


Would you care to list the ways?
Border?
Taxes?
War on Terror?
Energy Policy?
Health Care?
Welfare?
Social Security?

In which ways, speciifically, would Kerry be doing a better job?



Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?






Are you playing Imbroglio?

I live in Massachusetts, Kerry's home state, and he has done NOTHING for Massachusetts in the direction you described. NOTHING. John Kerry's biggest accomplishment in his tenure as senator has been to get himself elected and reelected.

Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:40:18 AM EDT

Originally Posted By 95thFoot:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By Sylvan:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.


Would you care to list the ways?
Border?
Taxes?
War on Terror?
Energy Policy?
Health Care?
Welfare?
Social Security?

In which ways, speciifically, would Kerry be doing a better job?



Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?






Are you playing Imbroglio?

I live in Massachusetts, Kerry's home state, and he has done NOTHING for Massachusetts in the direction you described. NOTHING. John Kerry's biggest accomplishment in his tenure as senator has been to get himself elected and reelected.




Theres a difference between Senator and President. Kerry was a good guy who cared about the country and the people in it, not just about oil and Haliburtons profits.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:42:34 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?

You can't be serious?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:45:33 AM EDT

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?

You can't be serious?



Lemme guess, your one of those greedy Capitalists that would happily sell your fellow man down the river and stab him in the back for your selfish materialistic wishes. Just so you could have a bigger house right?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:51:15 AM EDT
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: 'sär-"ka-z&m
Function: noun

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms

2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 4:55:48 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By VTHOKIESHOOTER:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
Borders: Kerry isnt for business, so he would have them sealed already. Bush keeps them open for the business's
Taxes: Kerry would make sure the poor were properly taken care of. The old, the sick, those who decide not to work but would rather stay home, they would have money to pay the bills. Hard working people who try to take advantage of others would be appropriately taxed.
War on Terror: We wouldnt be fighting it, they only want to attack us becuase we meddle in their affairs. If we leave them alone, they wouldleave us alone.
Energy Policy: Kerry is Democrat, there for alternative energies. He woudl place a high tax on gas guzzlers and give tax breaks to those peoplesmart enough to see we have a problem and buy a efficient car.
Health Care: We'd have a government controlled healthcare, which is the best plan. Affordbale quality healthcare for everyone.
Welfare: He'd increase the funding to make sure the poor, sick and those who choose not to work can provide for themselves and their family.
SS: He'd increase funding, cut military spending and make sure we could all retire rich.

Doesnt that sound like paradise to you?

You can't be serious?



Lemme guess, your one of those greedy Capitalists that would happily sell your fellow man down the river and stab him in the back for your selfish materialistic wishes. Just so you could have a bigger house right?

I am a capitalist. It is what works because capitalism is freedom. If you don't believe in the free market then you support slavery and communism. I do not wish to be shackled by the government and held down by the leaches of society.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:01:06 AM EDT

Originally Posted By fireguy:
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: 'sär-"ka-z&m
Function: noun

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms

2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>




+ 87,000,000,000,0000,0000000000000000000000000­0000000



As the board has grown, so has the tendency of people to start a flame without reading.


READING IS FUNDAMENTAL!!!!!

Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:22:20 AM EDT
I was just reading a CNN story about how John Kerry is attacking the administration, calling it incompetent and get this: wants more debate on NATIONAL DEFENSE.


Kerry's comments to ABC's "This Week" came two days after Rove -- whom President Bush called the "architect" of his 2004 victory -- told a group of fellow Republicans that Democrats are "wrong" on national security.

That argument, Rove said, should be repeated throughout the 2006 election cycle. (Full story)

Asked whether Republicans may successfully use the issue for political gain, Kerry responded, "I'm not worried in the least, and I welcome the debate. I want to have that debate, and I want to have that debate every single day."

He added, "Perhaps we didn't have that debate enough" in 2004.



This guy is so clueless on so many levels. Arguing to protect terrorists' civil rights, for example, does not make you look like the tough guy on national security. Serving 3 months in Vietnam 35 years ago is not as important to voters as how you acted in the US Senate for 20 years when gauging your position on national security. Kerry's attacking an administration he wont be running against, and furthermore, his party will never back him in his wildest dreams because he lost and they never liked him anyway.

You almost have to pity the man.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:24:41 AM EDT

Originally Posted By fireguy:
Main Entry: sar·casm
Pronunciation: 'sär-"ka-z&m
Function: noun

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain <tired of continual sarcasms

2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm <this is no time to indulge in sarcasm>



Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:31:53 AM EDT
This would be levergun.com because all of you evil scary looking Assault rifles (any magezine fed rifle), Assault shotguns ( any shotgun that can be modified to fire more than 2 rounds without reloading) and Assault handguns ( any handgun that is not a revolver)would have been banned and confiscated.

I don't like Bush but he is a damned sight better that John Scary would have been. Someone wake me when we get a fiscal conservitave / pseudo Libritaterian canadate.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:35:14 AM EDT

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By 82ndAbn:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



Liberal! Hippy! America hater! Communist! Terrorist Apologist!



You forgot Socialist. How could you forget Socialist.



Actually, he is a socio-communist. There is a difference.
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:38:49 AM EDT
Who?

Link Posted: 1/23/2006 5:45:44 AM EDT

Originally Posted By PsyWarrior:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By 82ndAbn:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



Liberal! Hippy! America hater! Communist! Terrorist Apologist!



You forgot Socialist. How could you forget Socialist.



Actually, he is a socio-communist. There is a difference.



Can I be a socio-environwhacko communist? Please?
Link Posted: 1/23/2006 6:55:45 AM EDT

Originally Posted By PsyWarrior:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:

Originally Posted By 82ndAbn:

Originally Posted By Specop_007:
We'd be alot better off if it was Kerry instead of Bush.



Liberal! Hippy! America hater! Communist! Terrorist Apologist!



You forgot Socialist. How could you forget Socialist.



Actually, he is a socio-communist. There is a difference.



No, he's a rich limousine liberal who never worked a day in his life, but married a woman who did the same thing to get her money. He wants to solve all the world's problems by taxing everybody else (but not himself) and will run everything by the UN to see if it's OK first...
Top Top