Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
11/24/2017 4:44:23 PM
11/22/2017 10:05:29 PM
Posted: 10/20/2004 3:33:33 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/20/2004 3:33:48 AM EST by chapperjoe]
Granted my wording (regarding mags) was dumb..... but if the law can't prove they are post-ban that means I can't prove they're post-ban either. Which means the thread was not about legality but about liability.

and I know it was worded badly!!!!!

DAMMIT, that's my first lock!!!!

Here's the thread as a CLEANED thread:

Let's say I live in NY/NJ.
Let's further posit that CDNN has unmarked hi-caps for the p89/pc9.
Let's not even ASK them when they were made.
Neither John Law nor I am able to tell that they areepost-ban - ZERO MARKINGS WHATSOEVER.

This has been coming up alot, so I figured it was a good topic.
I DO NOT INTEND to EVER do ANYTHING illegal (Hey, the Olsens are 18 now. Pounds that is.), so if I knew these mags are/were post-ban I WOULD NOT PURCHASE THEM. disclaimer over.
Link Posted: 10/20/2004 3:37:24 AM EST
Link Posted: 10/20/2004 3:39:27 AM EST
IT'S A TRAP!! IBTL!



Link Posted: 10/20/2004 3:40:08 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/20/2004 3:41:07 AM EST by Aimless]
Link Posted: 10/20/2004 3:41:23 AM EST
[Last Edit: 10/20/2004 3:41:23 AM EST by Aimless]
yes it is a trap!
Top Top