Granted my wording (regarding mags) was dumb..... but if the law can't prove they are post-ban that means I can't prove they're post-ban either. Which means the thread was not about legality but about liability.
and I know it was worded badly!!!!!
DAMMIT, that's my first lock!!!!
Here's the thread as a CLEANED thread:
Let's say I live in NY/NJ.
Let's further posit that CDNN has unmarked hi-caps for the p89/pc9.
Let's not even ASK them when they were made.
Neither John Law nor I am able to tell that they areepost-ban - ZERO MARKINGS WHATSOEVER.
This has been coming up alot, so I figured it was a good topic.
I DO NOT INTEND to EVER do ANYTHING illegal (Hey, the Olsens are 18 now. Pounds that is.), so if I knew these mags are/were post-ban I WOULD NOT PURCHASE THEM. disclaimer over.
yes it is a trap!