Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 9/23/2005 9:40:04 AM EDT
The Dems are gloating that his approval ratings are low.

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:40:46 AM EDT
[#1]
LMAO. You are right. He should be worried.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:40:56 AM EDT
[#2]
Don't think he can agin.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:41:36 AM EDT
[#3]
You can only serve 8 years.  
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:41:48 AM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:42:38 AM EDT
[#5]
I don't think Bush has to worry about getting re-elected...  unless the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution is repealed...
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:42:40 AM EDT
[#6]
Uh huh

I think you're right.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:42:41 AM EDT
[#7]
If Reagan couldn't pull off a third term then Bush doesn't have a chance.  
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:43:32 AM EDT
[#8]
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:43:53 AM EDT
[#9]
im voitng for bush again 2k8
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:45:11 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.



It is a fucking joke. And you could use some spelling lessons
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:45:27 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.


OMFG, i thought this thread was a joke at first!!! hahahahaahahahahahahaha best laugh i've had all week!
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:45:31 AM EDT
[#12]
I'll make book that  W won't get re-elected....any takers?
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:45:32 AM EDT
[#13]
You mean Bush can only run for two terms?

A number of Democrats have told me he is the nominee in 2008.

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:45:42 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
You can only serve 8 years.  



Actually, you can serve up to 10 years.  If you are the VP and complete less than two years of a President's term, you can still run twice.

(Just being nit-picky.  )
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:46:15 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.



You need to go back to sarcasm class...
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:46:35 AM EDT
[#16]
i could've sworn a prez can only serve 2 terms maximum.


Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:46:35 AM EDT
[#17]
Keep the monarchy alive.

Bring on the Jeb.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:47:19 AM EDT
[#18]
DAMN RIGHT!  

In fact, since his numbers suck so badly he should not be allowed to nominate any more judges!  Leave that to his successor...whoever she may be!  



Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:47:27 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
You mean Bush can only run for two terms?

A number of Democrats have told me he is the nominee in 2008.


aaahahahahhahahaha god stop! i'm crying here!!! ahahahahaaa
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:48:08 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
i could've sworn a prez can only serve 2 terms maximum.





The Democrats don't think so.

Go to DU.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:49:18 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.



You are the tard, Moron.  Flagrant Sarcasm can't get past you can it?
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:50:55 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
I don't think Bush has to worry about getting re-elected...  unless the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution is repealed...




Well the 1st and 2nd seem to be on the way out.  


Why not?
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:51:00 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:
You mean Bush can only run for two terms?

A number of Democrats have told me he is the nominee in 2008.




Last year I urged every Democrat to go out and vote for Kerry on  November 3, a Wednesday.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:51:06 AM EDT
[#24]
It wouldn't be so funny if the Democrats are really acting like Bush is running for a third term.

CRC
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:51:33 AM EDT
[#25]
Probably not
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:52:56 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
Keep the monarchy alive.

Bring on the Jeb.

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:54:02 AM EDT
[#27]
I'll be a monkey's uncle if he even tries.  Patty
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:54:13 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
It wouldn't be so funny if the Democrats are really acting like Bush is running for a third term.

CRC



Uh.  They have been campaigning against his reelection pretty strongly for the last year or so...  They know he is in trouble for 2008.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:55:07 AM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:

Quoted:
It wouldn't be so funny if the Democrats are really acting like Bush is running for a third term.

CRC



Uh.  They have been campaigning against his reelection pretty strongly for the last year or so...  They know he is in trouble for 2008.



I figured.

Even Joe Biden would stomp him.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:55:55 AM EDT
[#30]
Democrats actively bashing Bush until his term runs out while the actual Candidate for the Republican nomination (whomever that is) gets a pass seems to be incredibly good luck.  Those Dem strategists are brilliant as usual.

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:56:37 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.



Hey, even I know that and I don't even live in America

(but even if it was possible, I don't think he'd pull it off)

Mark
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:56:49 AM EDT
[#32]
I think if he handles this hurricane Rita deal better than the other one, his approval ratings should shoot up again and he might have a shot at it..........
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:57:39 AM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:
Democrats actively bashing Bush until his term runs out while the actual Candidate for the Republican nomination (whomever that is) gets a pass seems to be incredibly good luck.  Those Dem strategists are brilliant as usual.




They are reactionaries, plain and simple. All they can do is have a gut-level, knee-jerk response to things. No thinking involved.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 9:58:31 AM EDT
[#34]
Come on guys, let's be serious here.  Two terms only.  However, what the Democrats are doing is to help destroy Bush's approval rating.  Here is why they are doing this:  they know that the next Republican candidate for president will not be able to take over Bush's play book.  It's going to be a level playing field in 2008.  A lot can happen in three years.  My guess, despite the War on Terror and two damaging hurricanes, the economy will continue to grow.  Iraq will have to be stabilized (or at least more stable) over the next year and a half, and we will have to reduce the number of troops by one-half.  (I don't necessarily believe this, but politics will dictate when we begin drawing down the troops and by how much.)
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:02:06 AM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:05:44 AM EDT
[#36]
I cant wait unitl later when they claim that their hard work made Bush not seek re election. Come on you know those tards will say it.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:07:16 AM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
Come on guys, let's be serious here.  Two terms only.  However, what the Democrats are doing is to help destroy Bush's approval rating.  Here is why they are doing this:  they know that the next Republican candidate for president will not be able to take over Bush's play book.  It's going to be a level playing field in 2008.  A lot can happen in three years.  My guess, despite the War on Terror and two damaging hurricanes, the economy will continue to grow.  Iraq will have to be stabilized (or at least more stable) over the next year and a half, and we will have to reduce the number of troops by one-half.  (I don't necessarily believe this, but politics will dictate when we begin drawing down the troops and by how much.)



Sad thing is , its the Democrats that are trying to turn it into the quagmire they keep saying it is. Any hold up in progress I blame on the Dems.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:17:33 AM EDT
[#38]
Sad thing is , its the Democrats that are trying to turn it into the quagmire they keep saying it is. Any hold up in progress I blame on the Dems.

100% Agreed
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:22:46 AM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I don't think Bush has to worry about getting re-elected...  unless the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution is repealed...




Well the 1st and 2nd seem to be on the way out.  


Why not?



The 19th guys...that is what we need to repeal...
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:22:57 AM EDT
[#40]


Geez people! It's called SARCASM!
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:24:11 AM EDT
[#41]
Bush is president?
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:32:50 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
are your guys retarded?

A president can only serve 2 terms! with the exeption of some past during war time but I wouldn't expect to see it again.

You guys need to go back to school or somthing.



thank-you for posting this response. I just knew someone would know this little tidbit of information
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:34:05 AM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:

Quoted:
i could've sworn a prez can only serve 2 terms maximum.





The Democrats don't think so.

Go to DU.



You got a cold link?
I'd love to see!
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:35:46 AM EDT
[#44]
The point of this thread is too prove the left is still running against G.W. Bush when it's not possible.

That's OK, once again they won't know what hit them in 06 and 08.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:44:43 AM EDT
[#45]
They think that he can be kicked out if they get low enough
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:47:22 AM EDT
[#46]
Everytime anyone points out the President's approval rating is low, someone should point out how they had four years to try to beat him.  They kept televising four years of democratic debates.  Out of nine so called contenders, John Kerry was the best they had.  If the President sucks so bad, the party that tried to oust him must suck that much worse.
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:48:30 AM EDT
[#47]
Clinton/Sheehan '08!
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:49:12 AM EDT
[#48]
OK..all jokes aside...here's a real question:

Why re-elect then? I mean, if a president has a stellar first term, why put him back if the general laugh here is "WTH does he CARE what his approval rating is?"
I mean, that's what's so funny, really...the fact that the approval rating means squat in the second term. Personally, I think we should remove the 2 term limit.
Keep 'em working hard instead of resting on their laurels.
I understand WHY it was put in place, but have we, perhaps, come to a point where apathy in the second term (and I am not saying Dubya IS apathetic...but as a nation we may see a second termer with low approval that way) is to the point that if we can dangle a 3rd or 4th term it may improve?

Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:49:19 AM EDT
[#49]
Link Posted: 9/23/2005 10:53:47 AM EDT
[#50]
Why only 2 terms?
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top