Whoa, [b]hielo[/b] is correct.
Just because the Supreme Court says something is or is not constitutional doesn't mean that it is or isn't, in the grand scheme of things!
Just ask [b]Dred Scot[/b], if the SCOTUS had the final word on slavery. Or Mr. Plessy if SCOTUS was the final word on 'separate but equal' as being constitutional. Or Mrs. Skinner if SCOTUS was correct on forced sterilization of citizens with low IQs.
If and when the SCOTUS gives us the [b]incorrect[/b] 'interpretation' of the Second Amendment, then my response will be similar to Thomas Jefferson's response to a negative ruling by the SCOTUS during his presidency -
[size=4]Chief Justice Marshall has made his decision, Now let us see him enforce it![/size=4]
Of course, we know that an anti-gun decision by the SCOTUS will be gleefully enforced by the powers of darkness, but at least we will know where we stand! Finally!
Eric The(AndItMayBeOur'FinalStand'AtThat!)Hun[>]:)]