User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:04:51 AM EDT
[#1]
I support this.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:09:36 AM EDT
[#2]
well since people are often sent to jail for what should be justified self-defense, I'd say nope to that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:11:42 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: well since people are often sent to jail for what should be justified self-defense, I'd say nope to that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:12:46 AM EDT
[#4]
Having spent 8 years in Saudi Arabia where public punishments were common place I can say that no, it doesn't really cut down on crime.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:13:25 AM EDT
[#5]
If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:14:34 AM EDT
[#6]
That sure would suck for all those guys in TX where the DA and judges knowingly concealed evidence and convicted innocent men.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:15:59 AM EDT
[#7]
Yeah, no. The "justice" system is totally broken and biased in some places, especially when it comes to guns.
While I support the death penalty, I have little faith that it actually deters crime. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:16:09 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:17:46 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That sure would suck for all those guys in TX where the DA and judges knowingly concealed evidence and convicted innocent men. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:17:52 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I never said the government was a piece of this puzzle. What if the local people executed this action? Would that be a problem? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Who the fuck do you think you are kidding? You are a problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:18:04 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Justified self defense was not in my list. Thanks for playing though. To be more direct would my post be more effective in deterring a specific well know class of people? Their skin color doesn't play a part. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
well since people are often sent to jail for what should be justified self-defense, I'd say nope to that. many law makers consider using a gun for self defense to be a criminal act and will add it to your list of capital offenses whether you like it or not thanks for playing though |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:18:43 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Having spent 8 years in Saudi Arabia where public punishments were common place I can say that no, it doesn't really cut down on crime. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:18:47 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I never said the government was a piece of this puzzle. What if the local people executed this action? Would that be a problem? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Not only no, but fuck no. Ask Darren Wilson his opinion on this matter, if you can find him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:20:10 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mob justice? Not only no, but fuck no. Ask Darren Wilson his opinion on this matter, if you can find him. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Not only no, but fuck no. Ask Darren Wilson his opinion on this matter, if you can find him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:21:55 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Who the fuck do you think you are kidding? You are a problem. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Who the fuck do you think you are kidding? You are a problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:22:48 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: many law makers consider using a gun for self defense to be a criminal act and will add it to your list of capital offenses whether you like it or not thanks for playing though Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: well since people are often sent to jail for what should be justified self-defense, I'd say nope to that. many law makers consider using a gun for self defense to be a criminal act and will add it to your list of capital offenses whether you like it or not thanks for playing though |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:22:59 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I never said the government was a piece of this puzzle. What if the local people executed this action? Would that be a problem? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. that happens a lot in many countries. Here's video of what it looks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYLbAjrJI6Q |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:25:04 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: that happens a lot in many countries. Here's video of what it looks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYLbAjrJI6Q Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. that happens a lot in many countries. Here's video of what it looks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYLbAjrJI6Q |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:25:21 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And you think a jury doesn't do the same? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Not only no, but fuck no. Ask Darren Wilson his opinion on this matter, if you can find him. Surely you understand the difference between a lynch mob and a jury. Sure the current justice system is imperfect, but it's far more reliable than what you're proposing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:27:11 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You've got to be kidding me. Surely you understand the difference between a lynch mob and a jury. Sure the current justice system is imperfect, but it's far more reliable than what you're proposing. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. Not only no, but fuck no. Ask Darren Wilson his opinion on this matter, if you can find him. Surely you understand the difference between a lynch mob and a jury. Sure the current justice system is imperfect, but it's far more reliable than what you're proposing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:28:44 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
Poke holes in it, it must be wrong or it would have been tried. Do away with licenses/permits etc, constitutional carry for all. If you commit a criminal act with a firearm,do something stupid with it,rape,steal,rob,loot,assault etc: Your public execution is broadcasted on free television for all to see/in the middle of town square, etc. This shall be carried out with your own side arm if possible. You get one chance. If the offending criminal doesn't own a side arm the local crowd offers what they have and the gun is chosen by applause. The chances you get are 1. You are publicly ended in front of all when 1 offense is reached. This doesn't include your POA complaining about your corn. Would this be effective crime control? No, because in many - perhaps most - places, the left pretty much runs the justice system. You want to give them that power? Are you mad? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:29:42 AM EDT
[#22]
Your theory is stupid.
If you think there will be hundreds of public executions daily in the town squares youre crazy. How would this work in Los Angeles, NY, etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:32:42 AM EDT
[#23]
I was thinking this would apply to shitbags caught red handed, only.
As in no fucking doubt, no possibility of doubt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:36:01 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, because in many - perhaps most - places, the left pretty much runs the justice system. You want to give them that power? Are you mad? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Poke holes in it, it must be wrong or it would have been tried. Do away with licenses/permits etc, constitutional carry for all. If you commit a criminal act with a firearm,do something stupid with it,rape,steal,rob,loot,assault etc: Your public execution is broadcasted on free television for all to see/in the middle of town square, etc. This shall be carried out with your own side arm if possible. You get one chance. If the offending criminal doesn't own a side arm the local crowd offers what they have and the gun is chosen by applause. The chances you get are 1. You are publicly ended in front of all when 1 offense is reached. This doesn't include your POA complaining about your corn. Would this be effective crime control? No, because in many - perhaps most - places, the left pretty much runs the justice system. You want to give them that power? Are you mad? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:36:49 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your theory is stupid. If you think there will be hundreds of public executions daily in the town squares youre crazy. How would this work in Los Angeles, NY, etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 2:54:44 AM EDT
[#26]
Meh.
I'd rather see swift executions of all major crimes regardless of who carries it out or how. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:02:52 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Meh. I'd rather see swift executions of all major crimes regardless of who carries it out or how. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:07:27 AM EDT
[#28]
liberals would have an aneurysm.
most of them want a cushy jail with cable TV, pinball machines, and steak nights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:09:52 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I never said the government was a piece of this puzzle. What if the local people executed this action? Would that be a problem? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. So lynch mobs? Yeah they always get the right person. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:10:26 AM EDT
[#30]
More holes in this than a screen door.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:11:26 AM EDT
[#31]
How about no.
This is the dumbest shit I've read today. Congratulations. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:21:05 AM EDT
[#32]
I don't trust the government to execute anyone, so no.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:32:39 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Having spent 8 years in Saudi Arabia where public punishments were common place I can say that no, it doesn't really cut down on crime. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:39:12 AM EDT
[#34]
Look under your username to see how retarded your idea is.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:56:03 AM EDT
[#35]
So what you're calling for is essentially a sanctioned lynch mob? Do you think that's been historically successful?
The theatrics will make it different, I guess. Straight teener thread. It's already hard for us to not look like idiots around here. You aren't helping. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 3:58:58 AM EDT
[#36]
If you trust your "peers" to execute someone you are crazy
If you trust your "government" to execute someone you are crazy Who do we expect to kill all the people who don't belong in the first world? (or on this planet at all) GD doesn't want cops to do it. GD doesn't want to do it, as the civil persecution would be supposedly unbearable. I guess a lynch mob will make people feel less "responsible" for killing someone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 5:40:44 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
that happens a lot in many countries. Here's video of what it looks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYLbAjrJI6Q Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you trust the government to execute people, you are part of the problem. that happens a lot in many countries. Here's video of what it looks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYLbAjrJI6Q I wonder how unbiased his "trial" was? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 5:45:13 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't trust the government to execute anyone, so no. I don't trust the government to execute the right person anymore. I used to be fervently in favor of the death penalty, but since there has been a spate of exposed, botched imprisonments, I cannot believe that we haven't sent a few innocents to their deaths. Once you solve that problem then I say do it Texas style: give 'em a date and pull the plug on that date. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2015 5:45:40 AM EDT
[#39]
Your world doesn't seem to account for corruption in the "justice" system.
Until men are ruled by angels I will be resistant to such policies as yours. Capital punishment should require a massive amount of evidence, preferably video of the crime. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/3/2015 5:53:37 PM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:
Poke holes in it, it must be wrong or it would have been tried. Do away with licenses/permits etc, constitutional carry for all. If you commit a criminal act with a firearm,do something stupid with it,rape,steal,rob,loot,assault etc: Your public execution is broadcasted on free television for all to see/in the middle of town square, etc. This shall be carried out with your own side arm if possible. You get one chance. If the offending criminal doesn't own a side arm the local crowd offers what they have and the gun is chosen by applause. The chances you get are 1. You are publicly ended in front of all when 1 offense is reached. This doesn't include your POA complaining about your corn. Would this be effective crime control? I have an ever better theory, Burnsy. And I've posted it on this board several times. And it could even be a revenue producer! I call it The Black Circle. Paint a circle around an area, ranging in size from room-sized to city block or even larger. Legally declare that within that circle, There Is No Illegal Activity. Killing someone is not murder. Molesting someone is not rape. Stealing from them is not theft. Depending on the type of crime, you may release any number of persons into The Circle. Nothing they do to each other is illegal, and if one of them survives, he leaves the scene a free man. Imagine: The survivor of a criminal assault can have his assailant bound and gagged inside The Circle when it is closed, arranged by the police. (This is part of the perp's sentance). NOTHING THE VICTIM DOES IS ILLEGAL! Publically televise the outcome. Put it on Pay Per View for additional income. Wanna go to war with a separate gang? Put 'em in a city-block-sized Circle. Decide in advance what kind of weaponry, ammo, etc. each size has and let 'em go to it. This has the added benefit of being a terrific social pressure relief. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/3/2015 6:51:53 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted: Poke holes in it, it must be wrong or it would have been tried. Do away with licenses/permits etc, constitutional carry for all. If you commit a criminal act with a firearm,do something stupid with it,rape,steal,rob,loot,assault etc: Your public execution is broadcasted on free television for all to see/in the middle of town square, etc. This shall be carried out with your own side arm if possible. You get one chance. If the offending criminal doesn't own a side arm the local crowd offers what they have and the gun is chosen by applause. The chances you get are 1. You are publicly ended in front of all when 1 offense is reached. This doesn't include your POA complaining about your corn. Would this be effective crime control? In what way is this a theory? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/3/2015 6:56:31 PM EDT
[#42]
Lol
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
