Once CIA, always CIA, ya really think their gonna do away with one of our own guys???????
I mean shit, how are we gonna maintain our global war on terrorism for the next few decades, should the CIA guy they picked to head up their "faux" axis of evil actually turn up captured or killed.
Mike
ps - if he ain't dead already, then he's living the life of riley along with the head of the Pakistani ISI, Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad, (you remember him don't ya, as he's the guy that paid Mohamed Atta the $100k and was in high level meetings at the Pentagon on 9/11/01, before he was returned home to be retired least somebody actually ask about his connections to the hijackers) protected by those only interested in subverting the truth.
Here's abit of background about this CIA asset:
In the days following General Ahmad's dismissal, a report published in the Times of India, revealed the links between Pakistan's Chief spy Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad and the presumed "ring leader" of the WTC attacks Mohamed Atta. The Times of India article was based on an official intelligence report of the Delhi government that had been transmitted through official channels to Washington. Quoting an Indian government source Agence France Press (AFP) confirms in this regard that: "The evidence we [the Government of India] have supplied to the US is of a much wider range and depth than just one piece of paper linking a rogue general to some misplaced act of terrorism."
The revelation of the Times of India article has several implications. The Indian intelligence report not only points to the links between ISI Chief General Ahmad and terrorist ringleader Mohamed Atta, it also indicates that other ISI officials might have had contacts with the terrorists. Moreover, it suggests that the September 11 attacks were not an act of "individual terrorism" organised by a separate Al Qaeda cell, but rather they were part of coordinated military-intelligence operation, emanating from Pakistan's ISI.