Just something to think about....
First, some premises (Reading Comprehension Challenged folks TAKE NOTE):
Premise (1): This thread is about border security as a response to TERRORISM AND FOREIGN THREATS.
Premise (2): THIS IS NOT ABOUT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Premise (3): I oppose illegal immigration
Premise (4): I oppose the methods described in this thread, but am pointing them out to illustrate what a 'Fortress America'/'Border Security IS our national defense' world would be like!
Lately, as Ron gets more and more rabid with his anti-military/anti-war rants, I hear more and more Paul-fans spouting off that 'border security' is the answer to the terror threat...
Basically, they think that if we 'lock down the borders' we will be safe from all foreign threats, and won't need an active overseas military presence...
When I hear this, I don't think they realize what they are advocating....
You see, in reality this produces the ULTIMATE POLICE STATE FROM HELL...
Why?
Because in order to do this, here's what must be done:
1) Suspend all general aviation flights (flights by aircraft not registered as commercial air carriers with the US government) into the US regardless of point of origin. Have the USAF scramble fighters to turn around any private/civil aircraft attempting to enter US airspace, or escort them to a military base for arrest if unable to return to their country of origin....
2) Subject passengers leaving all international airports to biometric screening and random searches. Surround all international airports with razor-wire & armed guards.... After all it is through international airports, not the Mexican border, that terrorists tend to come here
3) Post troops along the Mexican AND Canadian borders (requiring a force basically the size of the entire active-duty Army and Marine Corps), and conduct random security checkpoints along ALL border roads (ala DUI checkpoints)....
4) Set up a naval exclusion zone along all coasts, prohibiting/intercepting all unregistered & non-commercial sea traffic.... Search all commercial vessels for stow-aways and terrorist WMD....
5) Operate security stations and random checkpoints along ALL coastal roads....
That's what it would take... There's your 'Borders secured for National Defense'...
One hell of a 'Big Brother' operation, eh?
Do you really think Paul would do something like this?
Personally, I don't think he would - it would violate his beliefs about smaller government, etc... I believe he'd destroy our offensive response via his bring-the-troops-home position, and then continue the status quo (possibly with a cop-out to the 'Mexicans are worse than terrorists' crowd) as far as our ability to stop foreign terrorists...
I don't want to live in a police state... I don't want to live in a nation that hides behind it's borders & depends on draconian security measures for it's national security - especially when it has the military power to secure itself through OFFENSIVE, rather than DEFENSIVE action....
So we have police state on one hand, and war overseas on the other...
War seems a much better alternative for the freedoms of the American people...
P.S. It's ironic that the lock-the-borders-down folks are also quick to scream 'Police State' whenever an illegal-immigration opponent suggests national ID and employment enforcement will stop illegal immigration...
Yet their 'way', done to the extent where it would actually WORK, would result int he biggest police-state the US has ever had!!!!!